Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/6] mm/mglru: speed up inc_min_seq() and fix cold/hot inversions
@ 2026-08-21 10:25 Barry Song (Xiaomi)
  2026-08-21 10:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/mglru: batch update lrugen->nr_pages in inc_min_seq() Barry Song (Xiaomi)
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song (Xiaomi) @ 2026-08-21 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, linux-mm
  Cc: axelrasmussen, baolin.wang, baoquan.he, chenridong, david, hannes,
	kasong, lianux.mm, linux-kernel, ljs, lyugaofei, mhocko, qi.zheng,
	shakeel.butt, stevensd, wangzicheng, weixugc, yuanchu, zhangbo56,
	Barry Song (Xiaomi)

This is an aging speedup series split out from the MGLRU swappiness
series [1], with the inc_min_seq changes separated to make them
easier to review.

Currently, inc_min_seq performance is crucial to both the swappiness
fix and proactive aging. There are two problems with it:

1. It processes each folio one by one, while many operations can be
batched or skipped. For example, a batch of folios can be moved together
from the oldest generation to the second-oldest generation, and the
associated counting can also be done in batches.

2. It may cause potential cold/hot inversion by placing promoted folios
(which have been scanned and found to have young PTEs) behind
non-promoted folios. A similar inversion can also occur among
non-promoted folios, as tail folios from the oldest generation are
placed before head folios when moving them to the second-oldest
generation.

This series tries to batch operations as much as possible and fix the
potential cold/hot inversion by keeping promoted folios ahead of
non-promoted folios, while also preserving the order of non-promoted
folios when moving them from the oldest generation to the second-oldest
generation.

Minor issue: inc_min_seq() also counts protected folios
improperly, as promoted folios should be skipped, as in
sort_folio().

We need a stable workload with a stable number of folios to measure
aging and evaluate the speedup in inc_min_seq(). So I asked ChatGPT
to generate the microbenchmark below. It ages an LRU vec containing
512 MB of memory 100 times:

 #define _GNU_SOURCE
 
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <stdint.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
 #include <fcntl.h>
 #include <errno.h>
 #include <time.h>
 #include <sys/mman.h>
 
 #define SIZE		(512UL * 1024 * 1024)
 #define LRU_GEN		"/sys/kernel/debug/lru_gen"
 #define TARGET_CGROUP	"/system.slice/agetest.scope"
 #define START_GEN	3
 #define END_GEN	103
 
 static long long nsec_diff(const struct timespec *start,
 			   const struct timespec *end)
 {
 	return (end->tv_sec - start->tv_sec) * 1000000000LL +
 	       (end->tv_nsec - start->tv_nsec);
 }
 
 static int find_memcg_id(void)
 {
 	FILE *fp;
 	char line[4096];
 	int memcg_id;
 
 	fp = fopen(LRU_GEN, "r");
 	if (!fp) {
 		perror("fopen lru_gen");
 		return -1;
 	}
 
 	while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), fp)) {
 		char *p;
 
 		if (strncmp(line, "memcg ", 6))
 			continue;
 
 		p = line + 6;
 
 		if (sscanf(p, "%d", &memcg_id) != 1)
 			continue;
 
 		/*
 		 * The memcg path follows the numeric ID.
 		 */
 		p = strchr(p, ' ');
 		if (!p)
 			continue;
 
 		if (strstr(p, TARGET_CGROUP)) {
 			fclose(fp);
 			return memcg_id;
 		}
 	}
 
 	fclose(fp);
 
 	fprintf(stderr, "Cannot find %s\n", TARGET_CGROUP);
 	return -1;
 }
 
 int main(void)
 {
 	void *addr;
 	int memcg_id;
 	int fd;
 	long long total_ns = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * mmap 512 MB and touch every page.
 	 */
 	addr = mmap(NULL, SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
 		    MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
 	if (addr == MAP_FAILED) {
 		perror("mmap");
 		return 1;
 	}
 
 	memset(addr, 0x55, SIZE);
 
 	printf("mmap: %p, size: %lu MB\n",
 	       addr, SIZE / 1024 / 1024);
 
 	/*
 	 * Find the memcg ID automatically.
 	 */
 	memcg_id = find_memcg_id();
 	if (memcg_id < 0)
 		return 1;
 
 	printf("memcg: %d (%s)\n", memcg_id, TARGET_CGROUP);
 	printf("aging generation %d -> %d\n",
 	       START_GEN, END_GEN);
 
 	fd = open(LRU_GEN, O_WRONLY);
 	if (fd < 0) {
 		perror("open lru_gen");
 		return 1;
 	}
 
 	for (int gen = START_GEN; gen <= END_GEN; gen++) {
 		char buf[128];
 		int len;
 		struct timespec start, end;
 		long long ns;
 
 		len = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
 			       "+ %d 0 %d\n", memcg_id, gen);
 
 		clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &start);
 
 		if (write(fd, buf, len) != len) {
 			perror("write lru_gen");
 			close(fd);
 			return 1;
 		}
 
 		clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &end);
 
 		ns = nsec_diff(&start, &end);
 		total_ns += ns;
 
 		printf("gen %3d: %8.3f ms\n",
 		       gen, ns / 1000000.0);
 		fflush(stdout);
 	}
 
 	close(fd);
 
 	printf("\nTotal:   %.3f ms\n",
 	       total_ns / 1000000.0);
 	printf("Average: %.3f ms\n",
 	       total_ns / (double)(END_GEN - START_GEN + 1) /
 	       1000000.0);
 
 	while (1)
 		sleep(1);
 
 	return 0;
 }

Run the above microbenchmark with:
systemd-run --scope --unit=agetest -p MemoryMax=1024M ./agetest

I’m seeing inc_min_seq() become significantly faster:

W/o patch:

Running scope as unit: agetest.scope
mmap: 0x72c1b5a00000, size: 512 MB
memcg: 12673 (/system.slice/agetest.scope)
aging generation 3 -> 103
gen   3:    7.433 ms
gen   4:    0.949 ms
gen   5:    2.535 ms
gen   6:    5.043 ms
gen   7:    5.041 ms
gen   8:    5.027 ms
...
gen 100:    5.035 ms
gen 101:    5.011 ms
gen 102:    5.029 ms
gen 103:    5.056 ms

Total:   503.946 ms
Average: 4.990 ms

W/ patch:

Running scope as unit: agetest.scope
mmap: 0x7c4b1d200000, size: 512 MB
memcg: 12893 (/system.slice/agetest.scope)
aging generation 3 -> 103
gen   3:    7.538 ms
gen   4:    0.937 ms
gen   5:    2.348 ms
gen   6:    2.300 ms
gen   7:    2.302 ms
gen   8:    2.294 ms
gen   9:    2.296 ms
...
gen 100:    2.292 ms
gen 101:    2.307 ms
gen 102:    2.293 ms
gen 103:    2.293 ms

Total:   235.718 ms
Average: 2.334 ms

The average aging time drops from 4.990 ms to 2.334 ms!

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260812121658.69965-1-baohua@kernel.org/

Barry Song (Xiaomi) (6):
  mm/mglru: batch update lrugen->nr_pages in inc_min_seq()
  mm/mglru: batch update lrugen->protected in inc_min_seq()
  mm/mglru: enhance cold/hot inversion handling in inc_min_seq()
  mm/mglru: exclude folios promoted by aging from protected in
    inc_min_seq()
  mm/mglru: move folios from oldest gen to second-oldest gen from head
    to tail
  mm/mglru: batch move folios to the second-oldest gen's LRU

 mm/vmscan.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-21 10:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-21 10:25 [PATCH 0/6] mm/mglru: speed up inc_min_seq() and fix cold/hot inversions Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-21 10:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/mglru: batch update lrugen->nr_pages in inc_min_seq() Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-21 10:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm/mglru: batch update lrugen->protected " Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-21 10:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm/mglru: enhance cold/hot inversion handling " Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-21 10:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/mglru: exclude folios promoted by aging from protected " Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-21 10:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm/mglru: move folios from oldest gen to second-oldest gen from head to tail Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-21 10:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm/mglru: batch move folios to the second-oldest gen's LRU Barry Song (Xiaomi)

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox