From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
David Stevens <stevensd@google.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
suleiman@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC 06/10] Reclaim memory from blocked kernel stacks
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 14:32:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901123236.GA687043@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260828151747.20035d50@gandalf.local.home>
On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 03:17:47PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 1) 8072 104 update_group_capacity+0x94/0x960
> 2) 7968 528 update_sd_lb_stats.constprop.0+0x426/0x39b0
> 3) 7440 424 sched_balance_find_src_group+0x8f/0x1150
> 4) 7016 552 sched_balance_rq+0x934/0x4130
Bah, yeah, those on-stack statistics just keep growing.
This should probably help. Very lightly tested. Also we can probably
relax the assertion to bh-disabled and avoid the extra irq-disable
around sched_balance_rq().
Anybody got time to play around with this?
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 8dff37059faf..0c83b0856a95 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -11418,6 +11418,39 @@ struct sd_lb_stats {
struct sg_lb_stats local_stat; /* Statistics of the local group */
};
+struct pcpu_lb_stats {
+ struct sd_lb_stats sds;
+ struct sg_lb_stats sgs;
+ struct sg_lb_stats local_sgs;
+ struct sg_lb_stats idlest_sgs;
+};
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pcpu_lb_stats, pcpu_lb_stats);
+
+static inline struct sd_lb_stats *this_sds(void)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
+ return this_cpu_ptr(&pcpu_lb_stats.sds);
+}
+
+static inline struct sg_lb_stats *this_sgs(void)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
+ return this_cpu_ptr(&pcpu_lb_stats.sgs);
+}
+
+static inline struct sg_lb_stats *this_local_sgs(void)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
+ return this_cpu_ptr(&pcpu_lb_stats.local_sgs);
+}
+
+static inline struct sg_lb_stats *this_idlest_sgs(void)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
+ return this_cpu_ptr(&pcpu_lb_stats.idlest_sgs);
+}
+
static inline void init_sd_lb_stats(struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
{
/*
@@ -12406,12 +12439,13 @@ static struct sched_group *
sched_balance_find_dst_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
{
struct sched_group *idlest = NULL, *local = NULL, *group = sd->groups;
- struct sg_lb_stats local_sgs, tmp_sgs;
+ struct sg_lb_stats *local_sgs = this_local_sgs();
struct sg_lb_stats *sgs;
unsigned long imbalance;
- struct sg_lb_stats idlest_sgs = {
- .avg_load = UINT_MAX,
- .group_type = group_overloaded,
+ struct sg_lb_stats *idlest_sgs = this_idlest_sgs();
+ *idlest_sgs = (struct sg_lb_stats){
+ .avg_load = UINT_MAX,
+ .group_type = group_overloaded,
};
do {
@@ -12430,17 +12464,17 @@ sched_balance_find_dst_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int
sched_group_span(group));
if (local_group) {
- sgs = &local_sgs;
+ sgs = local_sgs;
local = group;
} else {
- sgs = &tmp_sgs;
+ sgs = this_sgs();
}
update_sg_wakeup_stats(sd, group, sgs, p);
- if (!local_group && update_pick_idlest(idlest, &idlest_sgs, group, sgs)) {
+ if (!local_group && update_pick_idlest(idlest, idlest_sgs, group, sgs)) {
idlest = group;
- idlest_sgs = *sgs;
+ *idlest_sgs = *sgs;
}
} while (group = group->next, group != sd->groups);
@@ -12458,17 +12492,17 @@ sched_balance_find_dst_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int
* If the local group is idler than the selected idlest group
* don't try and push the task.
*/
- if (local_sgs.group_type < idlest_sgs.group_type)
+ if (local_sgs->group_type < idlest_sgs->group_type)
return NULL;
/*
* If the local group is busier than the selected idlest group
* try and push the task.
*/
- if (local_sgs.group_type > idlest_sgs.group_type)
+ if (local_sgs->group_type > idlest_sgs->group_type)
return idlest;
- switch (local_sgs.group_type) {
+ switch (local_sgs->group_type) {
case group_overloaded:
case group_fully_busy:
@@ -12486,17 +12520,17 @@ sched_balance_find_dst_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int
*/
if ((sd->flags & SD_NUMA) &&
- ((idlest_sgs.avg_load + imbalance) >= local_sgs.avg_load))
+ ((idlest_sgs->avg_load + imbalance) >= local_sgs->avg_load))
return NULL;
/*
* If the local group is less loaded than the selected
* idlest group don't try and push any tasks.
*/
- if (idlest_sgs.avg_load >= (local_sgs.avg_load + imbalance))
+ if (idlest_sgs->avg_load >= (local_sgs->avg_load + imbalance))
return NULL;
- if (100 * local_sgs.avg_load <= sd->imbalance_pct * idlest_sgs.avg_load)
+ if (100 * local_sgs->avg_load <= sd->imbalance_pct * idlest_sgs->avg_load)
return NULL;
break;
@@ -12545,9 +12579,9 @@ sched_balance_find_dst_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int
imb_numa_nr = min(w, sd->imb_numa_nr);
}
- imbalance = abs(local_sgs.idle_cpus - idlest_sgs.idle_cpus);
+ imbalance = abs(local_sgs->idle_cpus - idlest_sgs->idle_cpus);
if (!adjust_numa_imbalance(imbalance,
- local_sgs.sum_nr_running + 1,
+ local_sgs->sum_nr_running + 1,
imb_numa_nr)) {
return NULL;
}
@@ -12560,7 +12594,7 @@ sched_balance_find_dst_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int
* up that the group has less spare capacity but finally more
* idle CPUs which means more opportunity to run task.
*/
- if (local_sgs.idle_cpus >= idlest_sgs.idle_cpus)
+ if (local_sgs->idle_cpus >= idlest_sgs->idle_cpus)
return NULL;
break;
}
@@ -12647,14 +12681,13 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
{
struct sched_group *sg = env->sd->groups;
struct sg_lb_stats *local = &sds->local_stat;
- struct sg_lb_stats tmp_sgs;
unsigned long sum_util = 0;
bool sg_overloaded = 0, sg_overutilized = 0;
env->dst_core_idle = !sched_smt_active() || is_core_idle(env->dst_cpu);
do {
- struct sg_lb_stats *sgs = &tmp_sgs;
+ struct sg_lb_stats *sgs = this_sgs();
int local_group;
local_group = cpumask_test_cpu(env->dst_cpu, sched_group_span(sg));
@@ -12929,21 +12962,21 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s
static struct sched_group *sched_balance_find_src_group(struct lb_env *env)
{
struct sg_lb_stats *local, *busiest;
- struct sd_lb_stats sds;
+ struct sd_lb_stats *sds = this_sds();
- init_sd_lb_stats(&sds);
+ init_sd_lb_stats(sds);
/*
* Compute the various statistics relevant for load balancing at
* this level.
*/
- update_sd_lb_stats(env, &sds);
+ update_sd_lb_stats(env, sds);
/* There is no busy sibling group to pull tasks from */
- if (!sds.busiest)
+ if (!sds->busiest)
goto out_balanced;
- busiest = &sds.busiest_stat;
+ busiest = &sds->busiest_stat;
/* Misfit tasks should be dealt with regardless of the avg load */
if (busiest->group_type == group_misfit_task)
@@ -12965,7 +12998,7 @@ static struct sched_group *sched_balance_find_src_group(struct lb_env *env)
if (busiest->group_type == group_imbalanced)
goto force_balance;
- local = &sds.local_stat;
+ local = &sds->local_stat;
/*
* If the local group is busier than the selected busiest group
* don't try and pull any tasks.
@@ -12986,14 +13019,14 @@ static struct sched_group *sched_balance_find_src_group(struct lb_env *env)
goto out_balanced;
/* XXX broken for overlapping NUMA groups */
- sds.avg_load = (sds.total_load * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) /
- sds.total_capacity;
+ sds->avg_load = (sds->total_load * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) /
+ sds->total_capacity;
/*
* Don't pull any tasks if this group is already above the
* domain average load.
*/
- if (local->avg_load >= sds.avg_load)
+ if (local->avg_load >= sds->avg_load)
goto out_balanced;
/*
@@ -13009,9 +13042,9 @@ static struct sched_group *sched_balance_find_src_group(struct lb_env *env)
* Try to move all excess tasks to a sibling domain of the busiest
* group's child domain.
*/
- if (sds.prefer_sibling && local->group_type == group_has_spare &&
+ if (sds->prefer_sibling && local->group_type == group_has_spare &&
(busiest->group_type == group_llc_balance ||
- sibling_imbalance(env, &sds, busiest, local) > 1))
+ sibling_imbalance(env, sds, busiest, local) > 1))
goto force_balance;
if (busiest->group_type != group_overloaded) {
@@ -13025,7 +13058,7 @@ static struct sched_group *sched_balance_find_src_group(struct lb_env *env)
}
if (busiest->group_type == group_smt_balance &&
- smt_vs_nonsmt_groups(sds.local, sds.busiest)) {
+ smt_vs_nonsmt_groups(sds->local, sds->busiest)) {
/* Let non SMT CPU pull from SMT CPU sharing with sibling */
goto force_balance;
}
@@ -13054,8 +13087,8 @@ static struct sched_group *sched_balance_find_src_group(struct lb_env *env)
force_balance:
/* Looks like there is an imbalance. Compute it */
- calculate_imbalance(env, &sds);
- return env->imbalance ? sds.busiest : NULL;
+ calculate_imbalance(env, sds);
+ return env->imbalance ? sds->busiest : NULL;
out_balanced:
env->imbalance = 0;
@@ -13958,6 +13991,7 @@ static void sched_balance_domains(struct rq *rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
interval = get_sd_balance_interval(sd, busy);
if (time_after_eq(jiffies, sd->last_balance + interval)) {
+ guard(irqsave)();
if (sched_balance_rq(cpu, rq, sd, idle, &continue_balancing)) {
/*
* The LBF_DST_PINNED logic could have changed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-27 23:29 [RFC 00/10] Reclaimable kernel stacks David Stevens
2026-08-27 23:29 ` [RFC 01/10] Add !MEMCG memcg_list_lru_alloc implementation David Stevens
2026-08-27 23:29 ` [RFC 02/10] mm/vmalloc: Skip vmallocinfo NUMA stats for VM_SPARSE David Stevens
2026-08-27 23:29 ` [RFC 03/10] fork: refactor vmap stack alloc/free into helpers David Stevens
2026-08-27 23:29 ` [RFC 04/10] mm: vmalloc: support creating aligned vm areas David Stevens
2026-08-27 23:29 ` [RFC 05/10] fork: allocate reclaimable stacks with VM_SPARSE David Stevens
2026-08-27 23:29 ` [RFC 06/10] Reclaim memory from blocked kernel stacks David Stevens
2026-08-28 11:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-28 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-28 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-29 0:18 ` David Stevens
2026-08-29 8:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-29 8:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-31 17:44 ` David Stevens
2026-08-28 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-28 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-28 23:33 ` David Stevens
2026-08-28 13:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-08-28 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-28 14:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-28 15:58 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-08-28 15:10 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-08-28 19:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-08-28 19:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-08-28 19:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-08-31 6:55 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-08-31 7:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-31 15:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-09-01 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-09-01 12:01 ` Will Deacon
2026-08-28 20:50 ` David Stevens
2026-08-29 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-29 14:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-08-31 7:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-31 7:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-08-31 14:03 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-08-31 14:19 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-08-28 21:17 ` David Stevens
2026-08-31 8:08 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-08-31 18:20 ` David Stevens
2026-08-27 23:29 ` [RFC 07/10] Reclaim stacks via a shrinker David Stevens
2026-08-27 23:29 ` [RFC 08/10] Set PF_RECLAIMABLE_STACK in various places David Stevens
2026-08-28 6:33 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-01 9:27 ` Alice Ryhl
2026-08-27 23:29 ` [RFC 09/10] x86: Enable reclaimable stacks David Stevens
2026-08-27 23:29 ` [RFC 10/10] arm64: " David Stevens
2026-08-28 12:47 ` [RFC 00/10] Reclaimable kernel stacks Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-28 14:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-08-28 14:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-28 14:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-28 16:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-08-28 17:58 ` David Stevens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260901123236.GA687043@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=stevensd@google.com \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox