Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Stevens <stevensd@google.com>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: Don't call schedule_work when no spinning is allowed
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 16:59:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901205946.GL3004@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <apbyZgB_Zu-DK8pN@tiehlicka>

On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 05:42:30PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 01-09-26 10:25:52, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 06:04:57PM -0700, David Stevens wrote:
> [...]
> > > There would be no guarantee that memcg reclaim would ever be
> > > triggered, which also would also stop MEMCG_HIGH events from being
> > > generated. Overall that seems a more serious than just dropping
> > > userspace notifications like is done for MEMCG_MAX.
> > 
> > I'm leaning that way too. It's an indefinite error, and it's a freely
> > programmable surface.
> 
> I am really curious about the indefinite error side of things. It has
> been my understanding that these NMI safe charges are a) rare and b)
> there is userspace running so eventually any discrepancies would
> resolve so the excess is temporary.

So I think the question is what limits the error in both space and
time. When you say it's rare and userspace fixes it, it basically
means the answer is: luck of the common case.

But that doesn't help the worst case that can be triggered.

Like I said, if we need to have code to handle that !allow_spinning
case anyway, I'd rather just have a few lines of working code than a
(lengthy) comment explaining the luck of the common case.


      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-01 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-31 23:43 [PATCH] memcg: Don't call schedule_work when no spinning is allowed David Stevens
2026-09-01  0:02 ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-01  0:10 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-09-01  1:04   ` David Stevens
2026-09-01  8:18     ` Michal Hocko
2026-09-01 18:08       ` David Stevens
2026-09-01 14:25     ` Johannes Weiner
2026-09-01 15:42       ` Michal Hocko
2026-09-01 20:59         ` Johannes Weiner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260901205946.GL3004@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=stevensd@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox