From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: David Stevens <stevensd@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: Don't call schedule_work when no spinning is allowed
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 17:10:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apYXCL_GJs9Ovu0v@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831234339.280376-1-stevensd@google.com>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 04:43:39PM -0700, David Stevens wrote:
> Memcg charging can be done from any context, but calling schedule_work()
> isn't safe from an NMI. If memory.high is breached from a context where
> spinning isn't allowed, use irq_work to schedule the reclaim work.
>
> Fixes: 3ac4638a734a ("memcg: make memcg_rstat_updated nmi safe")
> Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@google.com>
Did you hit this issue or just code inspection? I assume this is the
done_restock code path.
> ---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 1 +
> mm/memcontrol.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 8170bb8066a2..036d973ceca6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> spinlock_t peaks_lock;
>
> /* Range enforcement for interrupt charges */
> + struct irq_work high_irq_work;
Instead of adding more complexity, let's just return if we can not spin on
done_restock path.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 23:43 [PATCH] memcg: Don't call schedule_work when no spinning is allowed David Stevens
2026-09-01 0:02 ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-01 0:10 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2026-09-01 1:04 ` David Stevens
2026-09-01 8:18 ` Michal Hocko
2026-09-01 18:08 ` David Stevens
2026-09-01 14:25 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-09-01 15:42 ` Michal Hocko
2026-09-01 20:59 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apYXCL_GJs9Ovu0v@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=stevensd@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox