Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: David Stevens <stevensd@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: Don't call schedule_work when no spinning is allowed
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 17:10:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <apYXCL_GJs9Ovu0v@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831234339.280376-1-stevensd@google.com>

On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 04:43:39PM -0700, David Stevens wrote:
> Memcg charging can be done from any context, but calling schedule_work()
> isn't safe from an NMI. If memory.high is breached from a context where
> spinning isn't allowed, use irq_work to schedule the reclaim work.
> 
> Fixes: 3ac4638a734a ("memcg: make memcg_rstat_updated nmi safe")
> Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@google.com>

Did you hit this issue or just code inspection? I assume this is the
done_restock code path.

> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h |  1 +
>  mm/memcontrol.c            | 12 +++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 8170bb8066a2..036d973ceca6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>  	spinlock_t	 peaks_lock;
>  
>  	/* Range enforcement for interrupt charges */
> +	struct irq_work high_irq_work;

Instead of adding more complexity, let's just return if we can not spin on
done_restock path.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-01  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-31 23:43 [PATCH] memcg: Don't call schedule_work when no spinning is allowed David Stevens
2026-09-01  0:02 ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-01  0:10 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2026-09-01  1:04   ` David Stevens
2026-09-01  8:18     ` Michal Hocko
2026-09-01 18:08       ` David Stevens
2026-09-01 14:25     ` Johannes Weiner
2026-09-01 15:42       ` Michal Hocko
2026-09-01 20:59         ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=apYXCL_GJs9Ovu0v@linux.dev \
    --to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=stevensd@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox