From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/5] mm: add a_ops->dirty_folio_range() and use the mkclean dirty harvest
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 19:29:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903182943.662461-3-kirill@shutemov.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903182943.662461-1-kirill@shutemov.name>
From: "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@kernel.org>
Every way of dirtying part of a folio through a mapping ends up at
folio_mark_dirty(), which has no way to say which part changed, so
a_ops->dirty_folio() dirties all of it. A filesystem that tracks dirty
state per block then writes back the whole folio for a single stored
byte.
Add a_ops->dirty_folio_range() and folio_mark_dirty_range() to pass the
range on. The new operation can express everything a_ops->dirty_folio()
can, so folio_mark_dirty() goes through it with a range covering the
folio and a filesystem needs only one of the two. Filesystems without it
dirty the whole folio.
Use it in folio_clear_dirty_for_io(), where the page table dirty bits
were being turned into a whole-folio dirty. It now collects them with
folio_mkclean_dirtymap() and hands the filesystem the runs that were
dirty. A folio that is not already dirty still dirties whole, because
the clean to dirty transition needs the accounting in folio_mark_dirty().
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) <kas@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/fs.h | 3 ++
include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
mm/page-writeback.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 072d8cd09a0b..1d98b6c0b880 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -406,6 +406,9 @@ struct address_space_operations {
/* Mark a folio dirty. Return true if this dirtied it */
bool (*dirty_folio)(struct address_space *, struct folio *);
+ /* Mark [off, off + len) of a folio dirty */
+ bool (*dirty_folio_range)(struct address_space *mapping,
+ struct folio *folio, size_t off, size_t len);
void (*readahead)(struct readahead_control *);
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 87feaa5a2b78..7628262c17e1 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -3337,6 +3337,7 @@ struct kvec;
struct page *get_dump_page(unsigned long addr, int *locked);
bool folio_mark_dirty(struct folio *folio);
+bool folio_mark_dirty_range(struct folio *folio, size_t off, size_t len);
bool folio_mark_dirty_lock(struct folio *folio);
bool set_page_dirty(struct page *page);
int set_page_dirty_lock(struct page *page);
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 6c9c7ba89b8a..39b54c25a9fa 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -2751,6 +2751,21 @@ bool folio_redirty_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_redirty_for_writepage);
+/*
+ * Hand a dirtied range of @folio to the filesystem. ->dirty_folio_range() can
+ * express everything ->dirty_folio() can, so a filesystem that implements it
+ * does not need both, and a whole-folio dirty comes through here as a range
+ * covering the folio.
+ */
+static bool mapping_dirty_range(struct address_space *mapping,
+ struct folio *folio, size_t off, size_t len)
+{
+ if (!mapping->a_ops->dirty_folio_range)
+ return mapping->a_ops->dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
+
+ return mapping->a_ops->dirty_folio_range(mapping, folio, off, len);
+}
+
/**
* folio_mark_dirty - Mark a folio as being modified.
* @folio: The folio.
@@ -2782,13 +2797,39 @@ bool folio_mark_dirty(struct folio *folio)
*/
if (folio_test_reclaim(folio))
folio_clear_reclaim(folio);
- return mapping->a_ops->dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
+ return mapping_dirty_range(mapping, folio, 0,
+ folio_size(folio));
}
return noop_dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_mark_dirty);
+/**
+ * folio_mark_dirty_range - Mark part of a folio as being modified.
+ * @folio: The folio.
+ * @off: Offset of the modified range within the folio.
+ * @len: Length of the modified range.
+ *
+ * Like folio_mark_dirty(), but tells a filesystem that tracks dirty state per
+ * block that only [@off, @off + @len) changed, so writeback can skip the rest
+ * of the folio. Filesystems without that tracking dirty the whole folio.
+ *
+ * Return: True if the folio was newly dirtied, false if it was already dirty.
+ */
+bool folio_mark_dirty_range(struct folio *folio, size_t off, size_t len)
+{
+ struct address_space *mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
+
+ if (likely(mapping)) {
+ if (folio_test_reclaim(folio))
+ folio_clear_reclaim(folio);
+ return mapping_dirty_range(mapping, folio, off, len);
+ }
+
+ return noop_dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
+}
+
/*
* folio_mark_dirty() is racy if the caller has no reference against
* folio->mapping->host, and if the folio is unlocked. This is because another
@@ -2844,6 +2885,41 @@ void __folio_cancel_dirty(struct folio *folio)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__folio_cancel_dirty);
+/*
+ * Write-protect every mapping of @folio and hand the filesystem the parts that
+ * were dirty in a page table.
+ *
+ * Without ->dirty_folio_range() there is nowhere to put per-block state, so
+ * any PTE dirty bit dirties the whole folio. Same when the folio is not
+ * already dirty, because then the dirty transition needs the full accounting
+ * in folio_mark_dirty(), and for a folio too large for the bitmap, which the
+ * page cache does not make.
+ */
+static void folio_mkclean_for_io(struct folio *folio,
+ struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(map, 1UL << MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER);
+ unsigned int nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
+ unsigned int start, end;
+
+ if (!mapping->a_ops->dirty_folio_range || !folio_test_dirty(folio) ||
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(nr > (1UL << MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER))) {
+ if (folio_mkclean(folio))
+ folio_mark_dirty(folio);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ bitmap_zero(map, nr);
+ if (!folio_mkclean_dirtymap(folio, map))
+ return;
+
+ for_each_set_bitrange(start, end, map, nr) {
+ mapping_dirty_range(mapping, folio,
+ (size_t)start << PAGE_SHIFT,
+ (size_t)(end - start) << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Clear a folio's dirty flag, while caring for dirty memory accounting.
* Returns true if the folio was previously dirty.
@@ -2875,9 +2951,9 @@ bool folio_clear_dirty_for_io(struct folio *folio)
*
* We use this sequence to make sure that
* (a) we account for dirty stats properly
- * (b) we tell the low-level filesystem to
- * mark the whole folio dirty if it was
- * dirty in a pagetable. Only to then
+ * (b) we tell the low-level filesystem which
+ * parts of the folio were dirty in a
+ * pagetable. Only to then
* (c) clean the folio again and return 1 to
* cause the writeback.
*
@@ -2895,8 +2971,7 @@ bool folio_clear_dirty_for_io(struct folio *folio)
* as a serialization point for all the different
* threads doing their things.
*/
- if (folio_mkclean(folio))
- folio_mark_dirty(folio);
+ folio_mkclean_for_io(folio, mapping);
/*
* We carefully synchronise fault handlers against
* installing a dirty pte and marking the folio dirty
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 18:29 [RFC PATCH 0/5] mm: sub-folio dirty tracking for PTE-mapped mmap writes Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] mm: let folio_mkclean() report which pages had dirty PTEs Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` Kiryl Shutsemau [this message]
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm: keep the mmap dirty range down to the faulting page Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] iomap: narrow page_mkwrite() dirtying " Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] xfs: track mmap dirty state per block Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 19:55 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] mm: sub-folio dirty tracking for PTE-mapped mmap writes Pedro Falcato
2026-09-03 21:18 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260903182943.662461-3-kirill@shutemov.name \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox