Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
	Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
	Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com, "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/5] mm: add a_ops->dirty_folio_range() and use the mkclean dirty harvest
Date: Thu,  3 Sep 2026 19:29:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903182943.662461-3-kirill@shutemov.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903182943.662461-1-kirill@shutemov.name>

From: "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@kernel.org>

Every way of dirtying part of a folio through a mapping ends up at
folio_mark_dirty(), which has no way to say which part changed, so
a_ops->dirty_folio() dirties all of it. A filesystem that tracks dirty
state per block then writes back the whole folio for a single stored
byte.

Add a_ops->dirty_folio_range() and folio_mark_dirty_range() to pass the
range on. The new operation can express everything a_ops->dirty_folio()
can, so folio_mark_dirty() goes through it with a range covering the
folio and a filesystem needs only one of the two. Filesystems without it
dirty the whole folio.

Use it in folio_clear_dirty_for_io(), where the page table dirty bits
were being turned into a whole-folio dirty. It now collects them with
folio_mkclean_dirtymap() and hands the filesystem the runs that were
dirty. A folio that is not already dirty still dirties whole, because
the clean to dirty transition needs the accounting in folio_mark_dirty().

Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) <kas@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/fs.h  |  3 ++
 include/linux/mm.h  |  1 +
 mm/page-writeback.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 072d8cd09a0b..1d98b6c0b880 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -406,6 +406,9 @@ struct address_space_operations {
 
 	/* Mark a folio dirty.  Return true if this dirtied it */
 	bool (*dirty_folio)(struct address_space *, struct folio *);
+	/* Mark [off, off + len) of a folio dirty */
+	bool (*dirty_folio_range)(struct address_space *mapping,
+				  struct folio *folio, size_t off, size_t len);
 
 	void (*readahead)(struct readahead_control *);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 87feaa5a2b78..7628262c17e1 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -3337,6 +3337,7 @@ struct kvec;
 struct page *get_dump_page(unsigned long addr, int *locked);
 
 bool folio_mark_dirty(struct folio *folio);
+bool folio_mark_dirty_range(struct folio *folio, size_t off, size_t len);
 bool folio_mark_dirty_lock(struct folio *folio);
 bool set_page_dirty(struct page *page);
 int set_page_dirty_lock(struct page *page);
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 6c9c7ba89b8a..39b54c25a9fa 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -2751,6 +2751,21 @@ bool folio_redirty_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_redirty_for_writepage);
 
+/*
+ * Hand a dirtied range of @folio to the filesystem.  ->dirty_folio_range() can
+ * express everything ->dirty_folio() can, so a filesystem that implements it
+ * does not need both, and a whole-folio dirty comes through here as a range
+ * covering the folio.
+ */
+static bool mapping_dirty_range(struct address_space *mapping,
+				struct folio *folio, size_t off, size_t len)
+{
+	if (!mapping->a_ops->dirty_folio_range)
+		return mapping->a_ops->dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
+
+	return mapping->a_ops->dirty_folio_range(mapping, folio, off, len);
+}
+
 /**
  * folio_mark_dirty - Mark a folio as being modified.
  * @folio: The folio.
@@ -2782,13 +2797,39 @@ bool folio_mark_dirty(struct folio *folio)
 		 */
 		if (folio_test_reclaim(folio))
 			folio_clear_reclaim(folio);
-		return mapping->a_ops->dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
+		return mapping_dirty_range(mapping, folio, 0,
+					   folio_size(folio));
 	}
 
 	return noop_dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_mark_dirty);
 
+/**
+ * folio_mark_dirty_range - Mark part of a folio as being modified.
+ * @folio: The folio.
+ * @off: Offset of the modified range within the folio.
+ * @len: Length of the modified range.
+ *
+ * Like folio_mark_dirty(), but tells a filesystem that tracks dirty state per
+ * block that only [@off, @off + @len) changed, so writeback can skip the rest
+ * of the folio.  Filesystems without that tracking dirty the whole folio.
+ *
+ * Return: True if the folio was newly dirtied, false if it was already dirty.
+ */
+bool folio_mark_dirty_range(struct folio *folio, size_t off, size_t len)
+{
+	struct address_space *mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
+
+	if (likely(mapping)) {
+		if (folio_test_reclaim(folio))
+			folio_clear_reclaim(folio);
+		return mapping_dirty_range(mapping, folio, off, len);
+	}
+
+	return noop_dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
+}
+
 /*
  * folio_mark_dirty() is racy if the caller has no reference against
  * folio->mapping->host, and if the folio is unlocked.  This is because another
@@ -2844,6 +2885,41 @@ void __folio_cancel_dirty(struct folio *folio)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__folio_cancel_dirty);
 
+/*
+ * Write-protect every mapping of @folio and hand the filesystem the parts that
+ * were dirty in a page table.
+ *
+ * Without ->dirty_folio_range() there is nowhere to put per-block state, so
+ * any PTE dirty bit dirties the whole folio.  Same when the folio is not
+ * already dirty, because then the dirty transition needs the full accounting
+ * in folio_mark_dirty(), and for a folio too large for the bitmap, which the
+ * page cache does not make.
+ */
+static void folio_mkclean_for_io(struct folio *folio,
+				 struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(map, 1UL << MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER);
+	unsigned int nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
+	unsigned int start, end;
+
+	if (!mapping->a_ops->dirty_folio_range || !folio_test_dirty(folio) ||
+	    WARN_ON_ONCE(nr > (1UL << MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER))) {
+		if (folio_mkclean(folio))
+			folio_mark_dirty(folio);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	bitmap_zero(map, nr);
+	if (!folio_mkclean_dirtymap(folio, map))
+		return;
+
+	for_each_set_bitrange(start, end, map, nr) {
+		mapping_dirty_range(mapping, folio,
+				    (size_t)start << PAGE_SHIFT,
+				    (size_t)(end - start) << PAGE_SHIFT);
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * Clear a folio's dirty flag, while caring for dirty memory accounting.
  * Returns true if the folio was previously dirty.
@@ -2875,9 +2951,9 @@ bool folio_clear_dirty_for_io(struct folio *folio)
 		 *
 		 * We use this sequence to make sure that
 		 *  (a) we account for dirty stats properly
-		 *  (b) we tell the low-level filesystem to
-		 *      mark the whole folio dirty if it was
-		 *      dirty in a pagetable. Only to then
+		 *  (b) we tell the low-level filesystem which
+		 *      parts of the folio were dirty in a
+		 *      pagetable. Only to then
 		 *  (c) clean the folio again and return 1 to
 		 *      cause the writeback.
 		 *
@@ -2895,8 +2971,7 @@ bool folio_clear_dirty_for_io(struct folio *folio)
 		 * as a serialization point for all the different
 		 * threads doing their things.
 		 */
-		if (folio_mkclean(folio))
-			folio_mark_dirty(folio);
+		folio_mkclean_for_io(folio, mapping);
 		/*
 		 * We carefully synchronise fault handlers against
 		 * installing a dirty pte and marking the folio dirty
-- 
2.54.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-03 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-03 18:29 [RFC PATCH 0/5] mm: sub-folio dirty tracking for PTE-mapped mmap writes Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] mm: let folio_mkclean() report which pages had dirty PTEs Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` Kiryl Shutsemau [this message]
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm: keep the mmap dirty range down to the faulting page Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] iomap: narrow page_mkwrite() dirtying " Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] xfs: track mmap dirty state per block Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 19:55 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] mm: sub-folio dirty tracking for PTE-mapped mmap writes Pedro Falcato
2026-09-03 21:18   ` Kiryl Shutsemau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260903182943.662461-3-kirill@shutemov.name \
    --to=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox