* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm/memory: constrain generic_access_phys() to page boundary
2026-09-05 14:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Ren Wei
@ 2026-09-05 23:03 ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-07 12:08 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2026-09-05 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ren Wei
Cc: linux-mm, david, ljs, liam, vbabka, rppt, surenb, mhocko, notasas,
vega, rakukuip
On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 22:12:17 +0800 Ren Wei <weir@nebusec.ai> wrote:
> generic_access_phys() improperly validates the memory access range: it
> only validates the start address using follow_pfnmap_start() and passes
> PAGE_ALIGN(len + offset) to ioremap_prot().
>
> This poses two problems:
> 1. In PFNMAP VMAs, consecutive virtual pages are not guaranteed to be
> physically contiguous, and individual PTEs may have different access
> permissions or writability.
> 2. The mapping may cross VMA boundaries if len extends beyond vma->vm_end.
>
> Since __access_remote_vm() already loops over the requested length and
> accesses normal (struct page) memory page-by-page, constrain the ->access()
> callback in __access_remote_vm() to at most the current page boundary.
> Because VMA boundaries are always page-aligned, this also ensures the
> access never exceeds the current VMA.
>
> In generic_access_phys(), defensively clamp len to the page boundary as
> well, map only a single PAGE_SIZE via ioremap_prot(), and add a missing
> (resource_size_t) cast during PFN re-validation to avoid truncation on
> 32-bit PAE systems.
Thanks.
> Fixes: 9cb12d7b4cca ("mm/memory.c: actually remap enough memory")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Why are we proposing a backport? To do that we should provide
recipients with a clear description of the userspace-visible runtime
affects of this bug and I'm not seeing that in the changelog?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm/memory: constrain generic_access_phys() to page boundary
2026-09-05 14:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Ren Wei
2026-09-05 23:03 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2026-09-07 12:08 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand (Arm) @ 2026-09-07 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ren Wei, linux-mm
Cc: akpm, ljs, liam, vbabka, rppt, surenb, mhocko, notasas, vega,
rakukuip
On 9/5/26 16:12, Ren Wei wrote:
> From: Luxiao Xu <rakukuip@gmail.com>
>
> generic_access_phys() improperly validates the memory access range: it
> only validates the start address using follow_pfnmap_start() and passes
> PAGE_ALIGN(len + offset) to ioremap_prot().
>
> This poses two problems:
> 1. In PFNMAP VMAs, consecutive virtual pages are not guaranteed to be
> physically contiguous, and individual PTEs may have different access
> permissions or writability.
> 2. The mapping may cross VMA boundaries if len extends beyond vma->vm_end.
>
> Since __access_remote_vm() already loops over the requested length and
> accesses normal (struct page) memory page-by-page, constrain the ->access()
> callback in __access_remote_vm() to at most the current page boundary.
> Because VMA boundaries are always page-aligned, this also ensures the
> access never exceeds the current VMA.
>
> In generic_access_phys(), defensively clamp len to the page boundary as
> well, map only a single PAGE_SIZE via ioremap_prot(), and add a missing
> (resource_size_t) cast during PFN re-validation to avoid truncation on
> 32-bit PAE systems.
>
> Fixes: 9cb12d7b4cca ("mm/memory.c: actually remap enough memory")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Vega <vega@nebusec.ai>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Luxiao Xu <rakukuip@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ren Wei <weir@nebusec.ai>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> - Drop internal multi-page loop in generic_access_phys(); clamp the chunk
> size in __access_remote_vm() to PAGE_SIZE - offset instead, leveraging
> the existing caller loop (David Hildenbrand).
> - Defensively clamp len in generic_access_phys() and only map PAGE_SIZE.
> - Add missing (resource_size_t) cast when checking args.pfn (Andrew Morton).
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f618e2f57ad0086a8d7a95cb17dcf5a1f0cf0e45.1784428532.git.rakukuip@gmail.com
> ---
> mm/memory.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 8b0c2c735d3d..09390e51432f 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -7164,6 +7164,11 @@ int generic_access_phys(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> bool writable;
> struct follow_pfnmap_args args = { .vma = vma, .address = addr };
>
> + if (len <= 0)
> + return 0;
Why is that required? Why would it be valid to call this function with a size of 0?
> +
We should add a comment here explaining the situation:
/*
* Limit access to one page at a time, as that's what follow_pfnmap_start()
* guarantees; expect the caller to retry to read larger ranges.
*/
> + len = min_t(int, len, PAGE_SIZE - offset);
Do we really need the "min_t" here? (can't we use min?)
> +
> retry:
> if (follow_pfnmap_start(&args))
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -7175,7 +7180,7 @@ int generic_access_phys(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> if ((write & FOLL_WRITE) && !writable)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - maddr = ioremap_prot(phys_addr, PAGE_ALIGN(len + offset), prot);
> + maddr = ioremap_prot(phys_addr, PAGE_SIZE, prot);
> if (!maddr)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -7183,7 +7188,7 @@ int generic_access_phys(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> goto out_unmap;
>
> if ((pgprot_val(prot) != pgprot_val(args.pgprot)) ||
> - (phys_addr != (args.pfn << PAGE_SHIFT)) ||
> + (phys_addr != ((resource_size_t)args.pfn << PAGE_SHIFT)) ||
> (writable != args.writable)) {
> follow_pfnmap_end(&args);
> iounmap(maddr);
> @@ -7254,7 +7259,8 @@ static int __access_remote_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT
> if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->access)
> bytes = vma->vm_ops->access(vma, addr, buf,
> - len, write);
> + min_t(int, len, PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(addr)),
Why isn't it sufficient to cap in generic_access_phys() ?
--
Cheers,
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread