From: Lian Wang <lianux.mm@gmail.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
sj@kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, damon@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mm@kvack.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com>,
kunwu.chan@gmail.com, lianux.mm@gmail.com, baohua@kernel.org,
xueyuan.chen21@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [FYI] DAMON and virtio-balloon in DeepSeek's DSec paper
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 15:28:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260925072912.39496-1-lianux.mm@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f63d60c-913e-4e79-9d28-890dd48ef713@kernel.org>
Hi David,
Indeed, both directions are very exciting. virtio-pmem avoids duplicated
page-cache residency, while DAMON with free-page reporting provides a
practical path to reclaim cold guest memory and return it to the host.
This connects closely with the work we are already doing. We are continuing
to improve our DAMON-based experiments, and we would also like to explore how
DAMON-based memory reclamation can be coordinated with broader CPU and
resource monitoring.
At LPC, I plan to bring detailed data and discuss the follow-up design with
everyone. I hope we can turn this into an executable milestone, bring the
related ideas together, and try more scenarios as a community. Everything
looks very encouraging and gives us much to look forward to. With SJ helping
coordinate the broader roadmap and everyone contributing, I am confident that
we will achieve many more exciting results. Kernel work like this can continue
making the world better.
Thanks,
Lian
On Fri, 25 Sep 2026 09:04:41 +0200 "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org> wrote:
> Free-page reporting makes much more sense.
>
> When I was at RH we were looking at this issue as well. virtio-pmem was one
> way of avoiding the page cache in VM entirely. But it has its own limitations.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-25 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-25 5:44 [FYI] DAMON and virtio-balloon in DeepSeek's DSec paper Lance Yang
2026-09-25 5:57 ` Lian Wang
2026-09-25 6:46 ` KunWu Chan
2026-09-25 7:04 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-25 7:28 ` Lian Wang [this message]
2026-09-25 8:15 ` Lance Yang
2026-09-25 10:03 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-25 10:16 ` Gao Xiang
2026-09-25 10:27 ` Gao Xiang
2026-09-25 10:13 ` SJ Park
2026-09-29 12:32 ` Jialiang Huang
2026-09-29 12:41 ` Gao Xiang
2026-09-29 12:50 ` Jialiang Huang
2026-09-30 3:36 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-30 7:24 ` Gao Xiang
2026-09-30 9:37 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-30 10:33 ` Gao Xiang
2026-09-29 16:56 ` SJ Park
2026-09-30 3:07 ` Lian Wang
2026-09-30 8:08 ` SJ Park
2026-09-29 18:14 ` Pratyush Mallick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260925072912.39496-1-lianux.mm@gmail.com \
--to=lianux.mm@gmail.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=ryncsn@gmail.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xueyuan.chen21@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox