From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>,
mst@redhat.com, david@kernel.org, damon@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mm@kvack.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
ryncsn@gmail.com, kunwu.chan@gmail.com, lianux.mm@gmail.com,
baohua@kernel.org, xueyuan.chen21@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [FYI] DAMON and virtio-balloon in DeepSeek's DSec paper
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 03:13:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260925101332.49502-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260925054408.10431-1-lance.yang@linux.dev>
Hi Lance,
On Fri, 25 Sep 2026 13:44:08 +0800 Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was reading DeepSeek's new DSec paper[1] and found a nice use of DAMON
> and virtio-balloon:
>
> With this kind of workload, an agent may read a file once and never touch
> it again, while those pages remain in the guest page cache. Without memory
> pressure in the guest, they can stay cached even though the host would
> like that memory back ...
>
> The trick is DAMON + virtio-balloon free-page reporting :) DAMON reclaims
> cold file pages from the guest page cache; buddy gets a chance to coalesce
> them into reportable blocks, and virtio-balloon passes those blocks to
> Firecracker. Firecracker can then drop the host backing with MADV_DONTNEED.
>
> And it worked: time-integrated host memory use fell by 21.2%, while peak
> usage stayed about the same, with no significant CPU overhead. Pretty cool
> to see these pieces show up in another real, large-scale system :)
Thank you for sharing this, Lance!
>
> Kernel work still changes the world. Cheers to that!
Indeed, the community is making the work a great place.
>
> Anyhow, I still don't know DAMON and virtio-balloon as well as I should
> (mostly I just know the people who built them) :P
Please feel free to ask any question to DAMON community and me, whenever you
get :)
>
> [1] https://arxiv.org/html/2609.22978
I only briefly read the paper. But it looks like DeepSeek's DAMON usage is
similar to AWS' DAMON usage [1] for their serverless service.
While I was in AWS, I proposed [2] a more advanced version called
Access/Contiguity-aware Memory Autoscaling (ACMA). After the RFC idea v2 [2],
no progress is made so far, though. I shortly covered it in LSFMMBPF'25 [3],
but all I mentioned was that the project is suspended. Recently a useer has
personally reached out to me asking the status of ACMA. It is too early stage
of the discussion to say or promise something in my humble perspective, though.
[1] https://cdn.amazon.science/ee/a4/41ff11374f2f865e5e24de11bd17/resource-management-in-aurora-serverless.pdf
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240512193657.79298-1-sj@kernel.org/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250121183103.42877-1-sj@kernel.org/
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-25 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-25 5:44 [FYI] DAMON and virtio-balloon in DeepSeek's DSec paper Lance Yang
2026-09-25 5:57 ` Lian Wang
2026-09-25 6:46 ` KunWu Chan
2026-09-25 7:04 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-25 7:28 ` Lian Wang
2026-09-25 8:15 ` Lance Yang
2026-09-25 10:03 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-25 10:16 ` Gao Xiang
2026-09-25 10:27 ` Gao Xiang
2026-09-25 10:13 ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-09-29 12:32 ` Jialiang Huang
2026-09-29 12:41 ` Gao Xiang
2026-09-29 12:50 ` Jialiang Huang
2026-09-30 3:36 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-30 7:24 ` Gao Xiang
2026-09-30 9:37 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-30 10:33 ` Gao Xiang
2026-09-29 16:56 ` SJ Park
2026-09-30 3:07 ` Lian Wang
2026-09-30 8:08 ` SJ Park
2026-09-29 18:14 ` Pratyush Mallick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260925101332.49502-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=lianux.mm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=ryncsn@gmail.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xueyuan.chen21@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).