From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/slab: Call call_rcu() directly from __kfree_rcu_sheaf() in any context
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 08:53:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261016155340.3304319-1-puranjay@kernel.org> (raw)
__kfree_rcu_sheaf() can run with allow_spin == false, e.g. from
kfree_rcu_nolock(), where it may interrupt call_rcu() itself on the same
CPU. call_rcu() was not reentrant, so commit 69abda97a09b2 ("mm/slab:
extend deferred free mechanism to handle rcu sheaves") added a fallback:
when !allow_spin and IRQs are disabled, the full rcu sheaf is put on a
per-CPU llist and submitted to call_rcu() later from irq_work.
call_rcu() now handles this itself. When it is called with IRQs disabled
(from NMI, or re-entered from instrumentation), it stages the callback on
a per-CPU list and re-issues it from irq_work. Callers no longer need to
guard against that, so always call call_rcu() directly and remove the
rcu_sheaves llist and its irq_work handling.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
---
mm/slub.c | 28 +++-------------------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 8fbc6bf8ebc51..6c44f4495db5a 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -4145,7 +4145,6 @@ static void flush_all(struct kmem_cache *s)
struct deferred_percpu_work {
struct llist_head objects;
struct llist_head objects_by_rcu;
- struct llist_head rcu_sheaves;
struct irq_work work;
};
@@ -4154,7 +4153,6 @@ static void deferred_percpu_work_fn(struct irq_work *work);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct deferred_percpu_work, deferred_percpu_work) = {
.objects = LLIST_HEAD_INIT(objects),
.objects_by_rcu = LLIST_HEAD_INIT(objects_by_rcu),
- .rcu_sheaves = LLIST_HEAD_INIT(rcu_sheaves),
.work = IRQ_WORK_INIT(deferred_percpu_work_fn),
};
@@ -6308,22 +6306,8 @@ bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj, unsigned int free_flags)
* we flush before local_unlock to make sure a racing
* flush_all_rcu_sheaves() doesn't miss this sheaf
*/
- if (rcu_sheaf) {
- /*
- * With !allow_spin, we might have interrupted call_rcu()'s
- * IRQ-disabled critical section. If IRQs are not disabled,
- * we know that's not the case.
- */
- if (unlikely(!allow_spin && irqs_disabled())) {
- struct deferred_percpu_work *dpw;
-
- dpw = this_cpu_ptr(&deferred_percpu_work);
- if (llist_add(&rcu_sheaf->llnode, &dpw->rcu_sheaves))
- irq_work_queue(&dpw->work);
- } else {
- call_rcu(&rcu_sheaf->rcu_head, rcu_free_sheaf);
- }
- }
+ if (rcu_sheaf)
+ call_rcu(&rcu_sheaf->rcu_head, rcu_free_sheaf);
local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
@@ -6532,12 +6516,10 @@ static void free_to_pcs_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s, size_t size, void **p)
static void deferred_percpu_work_fn(struct irq_work *work)
{
struct deferred_percpu_work *dpw;
- struct llist_head *objs, *objs_by_rcu, *rcu_sheaves;
+ struct llist_head *objs, *objs_by_rcu;
struct llist_node *llnode, *pos, *t;
- struct slab_sheaf *sheaf, *next;
dpw = container_of(work, struct deferred_percpu_work, work);
- rcu_sheaves = &dpw->rcu_sheaves;
objs = &dpw->objects;
objs_by_rcu = &dpw->objects_by_rcu;
@@ -6571,10 +6553,6 @@ static void deferred_percpu_work_fn(struct irq_work *work)
kvfree_call_rcu(head, objp);
}
-
- llnode = llist_del_all(rcu_sheaves);
- llist_for_each_entry_safe(sheaf, next, llnode, llnode)
- call_rcu(&sheaf->rcu_head, rcu_free_sheaf);
}
static void defer_free(struct kmem_cache *s, void *head)
base-commit: e52c7c28dbece00f54dff26e1554df2fe59b02f3
--
2.53.0-Meta
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 15:53 Puranjay Mohan [this message]
2026-10-17 15:54 ` [PATCH] mm/slab: Call call_rcu() directly from __kfree_rcu_sheaf() in any context sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261016155340.3304319-1-puranjay@kernel.org \
--to=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox