From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay@kernel.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Harry Yoo" <harry@kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab: Call call_rcu() directly from __kfree_rcu_sheaf() in any context
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2026 15:54:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-175617@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016155340.3304319-1-puranjay@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mm: call_rcu() list corruption due to reentrancy from NMI
- [Low] mm: unused llnode field in struct slab_sheaf
--
commit 81da114bf5411864e59d873df170399156acac6d
Author: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
mm/slab: Call call_rcu() directly from __kfree_rcu_sheaf() in any context
This patch removes the deferred irq_work fallback for rcu_sheaves and
instead calls call_rcu() directly from __kfree_rcu_sheaf() in all contexts.
The commit message states that call_rcu() now natively handles reentrancy
from NMIs.
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 8fbc6bf8ebc51..6c44f4495db5a 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -4145,7 +4145,6 @@ static void flush_all(struct kmem_cache *s)
> struct deferred_percpu_work {
> struct llist_head objects;
> struct llist_head objects_by_rcu;
> - struct llist_head rcu_sheaves;
> struct irq_work work;
> };
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but since this patch removes the rcu_sheaves list and all
its associated logic, should the llnode field in struct slab_sheaf also be
removed?
It appears the llnode field in struct slab_sheaf was only used to defer
this call_rcu() invocation.
[ ... ]
> @@ -6308,22 +6306,8 @@ bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj, unsigned int free_flags)
> * we flush before local_unlock to make sure a racing
> * flush_all_rcu_sheaves() doesn't miss this sheaf
> */
> - if (rcu_sheaf) {
> - /*
> - * With !allow_spin, we might have interrupted call_rcu()'s
> - * IRQ-disabled critical section. If IRQs are not disabled,
> - * we know that's not the case.
> - */
> - if (unlikely(!allow_spin && irqs_disabled())) {
> - struct deferred_percpu_work *dpw;
> -
> - dpw = this_cpu_ptr(&deferred_percpu_work);
> - if (llist_add(&rcu_sheaf->llnode, &dpw->rcu_sheaves))
> - irq_work_queue(&dpw->work);
> - } else {
> - call_rcu(&rcu_sheaf->rcu_head, rcu_free_sheaf);
> - }
> - }
> + if (rcu_sheaf)
> + call_rcu(&rcu_sheaf->rcu_head, rcu_free_sheaf);
[Severity: High]
The commit message states: "When it is called with IRQs disabled (from NMI,
or re-entered from instrumentation), it stages the callback on a per-CPU
list and re-issues it from irq_work."
Looking at the implementation of call_rcu() and __call_rcu_common() in
kernel/rcu/tree.c, it disables IRQs and synchronously manipulates the
callback list. It does not appear to contain an NMI/irq_work fallback.
If __kfree_rcu_sheaf() is called from an NMI or tracing context (such as
from bpf or perf) while the CPU is already executing call_rcu() or
rcu_do_batch(), could this direct call to call_rcu() re-enter the list
manipulation and corrupt the RCU callback lists?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261016155340.3304319-1-puranjay@kernel.org?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-17 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 15:53 [PATCH] mm/slab: Call call_rcu() directly from __kfree_rcu_sheaf() in any context Puranjay Mohan
2026-10-17 15:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-175617@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox