* [PATCH] liveupdate: use scoped_guard for mutex in session operations
@ 2026-08-14 9:55 Chenghao Duan
2026-08-14 14:10 ` Pratyush Yadav
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chenghao Duan @ 2026-08-14 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pasha.tatashin, rppt, pratyush, graf, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
kexec
Cc: jianghaoran, duanchenghao
Replace manually paired mutex_lock/unlock with scoped_guard to align
with the coding style of the rest of the codebase and simplify locking
paths.
Signed-off-by: Chenghao Duan <duanchenghao@kylinos.cn>
---
kernel/liveupdate/luo_session.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/liveupdate/luo_session.c b/kernel/liveupdate/luo_session.c
index f38b5b18f3f8..06307868a44e 100644
--- a/kernel/liveupdate/luo_session.c
+++ b/kernel/liveupdate/luo_session.c
@@ -290,9 +290,8 @@ static int luo_session_retrieve_fd(struct luo_session *session,
if (argp->fd < 0)
return argp->fd;
- mutex_lock(&session->mutex);
- err = luo_retrieve_file(&session->file_set, argp->token, &file);
- mutex_unlock(&session->mutex);
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &session->mutex)
+ err = luo_retrieve_file(&session->file_set, argp->token, &file);
if (err < 0)
goto err_put_fd;
@@ -478,9 +477,8 @@ int luo_session_create(const char *name, struct file **filep)
if (err)
goto err_free;
- mutex_lock(&session->mutex);
- err = luo_session_getfile(session, filep);
- mutex_unlock(&session->mutex);
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &session->mutex)
+ err = luo_session_getfile(session, filep);
if (err)
goto err_remove;
up_read(&luo_session_serialize_rwsem);
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] liveupdate: use scoped_guard for mutex in session operations
2026-08-14 9:55 [PATCH] liveupdate: use scoped_guard for mutex in session operations Chenghao Duan
@ 2026-08-14 14:10 ` Pratyush Yadav
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pratyush Yadav @ 2026-08-14 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chenghao Duan
Cc: pasha.tatashin, rppt, pratyush, graf, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
kexec, jianghaoran
On Fri, Aug 14 2026, Chenghao Duan wrote:
> Replace manually paired mutex_lock/unlock with scoped_guard to align
> with the coding style of the rest of the codebase and simplify locking
> paths.
No. This is done explicitly because we don't want to mix gotos with the
automatic cleanup-style locking. I don't think we should change this.
[...]
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-14 14:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-14 9:55 [PATCH] liveupdate: use scoped_guard for mutex in session operations Chenghao Duan
2026-08-14 14:10 ` Pratyush Yadav
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox