From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: xu.xin16@zte.com.cn, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: chengming.zhou@linux.dev, hughd@google.com,
wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/3] ksm: Optimize rmap_walk_ksm by passing a suitable page index
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 08:53:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35b46b88-6f8a-4eb6-bef3-58389784f750@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703162510242nxmjbcLy5ccp1dbZSK3EU@zte.com.cn>
On 7/3/26 10:25, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn wrote:
> From: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
>
> User impact / Why this matters to Linux users
> =============================================
> When a system runs with KSM enabled and memory becomes tight, KSM pages
> may be swapped out or migrated. The kernel then performs a reverse map
> walk by rmap_walk_ksm to locate all page table entries that reference
> these pages. If A large number of unrelated VMAs can attach to a single
> anon_vma related with this KSM page, then rmap_walk might be severe
> performance bottleneck. In our embedded test environment, we observed
> ~20,000 VMAs sharing one anon_vma without any fork – purely from VMA
> splits, which cause 200~700ms duration of rmap_walk_ksm.
>
> When one of those VMAs mapped a KSM page, then this KSM page's rmapping
> will become bottleneck with hold its anon_vma lock for a long time. The
> anon_vma lock is not only used by KSM; it is a core lock protecting the
> VMA interval tree and is acquired by many critical memory operations:
>
> • Page faults: do_anonymous_page(), do_wp_page() (during COW)
> • Memory reclaim: try_to_unmap()
> • Page migration & compaction: migrate_pages(), compact_zone()
> • mlock / munlock: mlock_fixup()
> • Process exit: exit_mmap() (tearing down VMAs)
> • Cgroup memory accounting: mem_cgroup_move_charge()
>
> If one thread holds the anon_vma lock for hundreds of milliseconds
> because of an inefficient KSM rmap walk, any other thread that
> tries to acquire the same lock (e.g., an application taking a page
> fault, kswapd reclaiming pages, or a migration thread) will block.
> This leads to stalled application threads, increased latency
> spikes, and in extreme cases container timeouts or watchdog
> triggers.
>
> This patch reduces the worst-case anon_vma lock hold time during
> ksm_rmap_walk from >500 ms to <1 ms, thereby almost eliminating
> this source of lock contention and improving system responsiveness
> under memory pressure.
>
> Real-world examples:
> ====================
> - JVM / Go runtime: These use mmap for heap regions and later call
> mprotect(PROT_NONE) for garbage collection barriers or guard pages,
> splitting the original VMA into thousands of small pieces over time.
>
> - Database engines (MySQL, PostgreSQL): Large shared memory buffers
> or anonymous mappings are managed with madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) to
> release specific pages, which also splits VMAs.
>
> Root Cause
> ==========
> Through local debugging trace analysis, we found that most of the
> latency of rmap_walk_ksm occurs within anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach,
> leading to an excessively long hold time on the anon_vma lock (even
> reaching 500ms or more), which in turn causes upper-layer applications
> (waiting for the anon_vma lock) to be blocked for extended periods.
>
> Further investigation revealed that 99.9% of iterations inside the
> anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach loop are skipped due to the first check
> "if (addr < vma->vm_start || addr >= vma->vm_end)), indicating that a
> large number of loop iterations are ineffective. This inefficiency
> arises because the start page index and the end page index parameters
> passed to anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach span the entire address space
> from 0 to ULONG_MAX, resulting in very poor loop efficiency.
>
> Solution
> ========
> We cannot rely solely on anon_vma to locate all PTEs mapping this page
> but also need to have the original page's linear_page_index. Since the
> implementation of anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach — it essentially
> iterates to find a suitable VMA such that the provided page index
> falls within the candidate's vm_pgoff range.
>
> vm_pgoff <= original linear page offset <= (vm_pgoff + vma_pages(v) - 1)
>
> Fortunately, an earlier commit introduced the linear_page_index to struct
> ksm_rmap_item, allowing for optimizing the RMAP walk.
>
> Test results
> ============
> A rmap testbench can be obtained with two Out-Of-Tree patches at [1][2].
> After applying the OOT patches and building rmap_benchmark from:
> tools/testing/rmap/rmap_benchmark.c, we can start the performance test.
>
> The testing result in QEMU is shown as follows:
>
> KSM rmapping Maximum duration Average duration
>
> Before: 705.12 ms (705119858 ns) 532.04 ms (532041586 ns)
> After: 1.67 ms (1665917 ns) 1.44 ms (1443784 ns)
>
> The benchmark numbers are realistic, since we observed ~20,000 VMAs
> sharing one anon_vma on a production system running a Java application
> with KSM enabled. The lock hold time before the patch was measured at
> 228 ms (max) during rmap walks triggered by memory compaction and page
> migration. The benchmark reproduces that VMA count and lock‑hold
> behavior in a controlled environment.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/202605301703094695zmVgcSC27BNR0rH0N8_x@zte.com.cn
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260530170404509QpJmBtpSjn3uQHeVKA2iA@zte.com.cn/
>
> Co-developed-by: Wang Yaxin <wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Yaxin <wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 8:22 [PATCH v11 0/3] KSM: performance optimizations for rmap_walk_ksm xu.xin16
2026-07-03 8:23 ` [PATCH v11 1/3] ksm: add linear_page_index into ksm_rmap_item xu.xin16
2026-07-03 8:25 ` [PATCH v11 2/3] ksm: Optimize rmap_walk_ksm by passing a suitable page index xu.xin16
2026-07-06 6:53 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-07-03 8:26 ` [PATCH v11 3/3] ksm: add mremap selftests for ksm_rmap_walk xu.xin16
2026-07-06 6:55 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-05 8:00 ` [PATCH v11 0/3] KSM: performance optimizations for rmap_walk_ksm Andrew Morton
2026-07-06 4:40 ` xu.xin16
2026-07-06 6:49 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35b46b88-6f8a-4eb6-bef3-58389784f750@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox