Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v18 11/14] mm/khugepaged: Introduce mTHP collapse support

["David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>]

On 6/2/26 17:44, Lance Yang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2026/6/2 18:58, Nico Pache wrote:
>> On Sun, May 31, 2026 at 1:19 AM Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Hmm ... don't we lose the allocation-failure result here?
>>>
>>> Previously collapse_scan_pmd() propagated SCAN_ALLOC_HUGE_PAGE_FAIL from
>>> collapse_huge_page(), so khugepaged would call khugepaged_alloc_sleep()
>>> in khugepaged_do_scan().
>>>
>>> Now if allocation fails and nr_collapsed stays 0, we just return
>>> SCAN_FAIL. So we won't back off via khugepaged_alloc_sleep() anymore?
>>
>> Ok I did the error propagation! I think I handled both of these cases
>> you brought up pretty easily.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>> However I don't know what to do in the following case: We successfully
>> collapsed some portion of the PMD, but during that process, we also
>> hit an allocation failure. Is it best to back off entirely? or can we
>> treat some forward progress as a sign we can continue trying collapses
>> without sleeping.
>>
>> Basically, do we prioritize SCAN_ALLOC_HUGE_PAGE_FAIL or the
>> successful collapses as the returned value?
> 
> Thinking out loud, forward progress should win here, the allocation
> failure only matter if we made no progress at all?

Agreed, in the first approach, forward progress makes sense.

-- 
Cheers,

David