From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: set section order for device DAX
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2026 17:00:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6AEC3FC2-2365-4EB5-A022-8AB0EC111073@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1143901c-5036-4b79-8135-21ce57075136@linux.dev>
> On Sep 5, 2026, at 16:20, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> Hi Muchun,
Hi,
>
> On 8/31/26 3:53 PM, Muchun Song wrote:
>> Device DAX can use vmemmap optimization only when a full section is
>> populated with a compound-page geometry. Record that geometry in the
>> section order before populating the section, so later vmemmap accounting
>> and population decisions can use the section state directly.
>> Clear the section order when the section becomes empty again. Also reject
>> partial additions to a section that already has optimized vmemmap mappings,
>> because a section cannot safely mix optimized and ordinary vmemmap layouts.
>
> Perhaps we should explain why they cannot be safely mixed.
Yes, because compound_nr_pages() determines the number of struct pages to
initialize with section as the smallest granularity, they cannot be mixed.
>
>> Partial additions continue to use ordinary vmemmap population, so they do
>> not save vmemmap memory. Such additions are uncommon, and the lost saving
>> is negligible.
>> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
>> ---
>> mm/mm_init.c | 13 ++++---------
>> mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> Also, the issue sashiko reported looks like it was pre-existing, not
> introduced by this patch. So:
>
> Acked-by: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> Qi
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-05 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 7:53 [PATCH 00/11] mm: Switch device DAX to section-based vmemmap optimization Muchun Song
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: introduce CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION Muchun Song
2026-08-31 9:44 ` Qi Zheng
2026-08-31 9:49 ` Muchun Song
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 02/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: factor out shared vmemmap tail page allocation Muchun Song
2026-09-01 3:05 ` Qi Zheng
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 03/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: open-code init_compound_tail() Muchun Song
2026-09-01 3:18 ` Qi Zheng
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 04/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: prepare DAX vmemmap population for section orders Muchun Song
2026-09-03 6:36 ` Qi Zheng
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 05/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: set section order for device DAX Muchun Song
2026-09-05 8:20 ` Qi Zheng
2026-09-05 9:00 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 06/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: switch device DAX to shared tail vmemmap pages Muchun Song
2026-09-05 8:35 ` Qi Zheng
2026-09-05 9:08 ` Muchun Song
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 07/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: move HVO helpers to a public header Muchun Song
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 08/11] powerpc/mm: switch device DAX to shared tail vmemmap pages Muchun Song
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 09/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: drop the extra tail page from device DAX reservation Muchun Song
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 10/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: drop unused section_nr_vmemmap_pages() arguments Muchun Song
2026-08-31 7:53 ` [PATCH 11/11] Documentation/mm: update DAX vmemmap deduplication docs Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6AEC3FC2-2365-4EB5-A022-8AB0EC111073@linux.dev \
--to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox