From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: Introduce zone_appears_fragmented()
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:27:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76191a17-18bf-4e9b-9ab5-dc9a48abfabb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423055656.1696379-2-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On 4/23/26 07:56, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Introduce zone_appears_fragmented() as a lightweight helper to allow
> subsystems to make coarse decisions about reclaim behavior in the
> presence of likely fragmentation.
>
> The helper implements a simple heuristic: if the number of free pages
> in a zone exceeds twice the high watermark, the zone is considered to
> have ample free memory and allocation failures are more likely due to
> fragmentation than overall memory pressure.
>
> This is intentionally imprecise and is not meant to replace the core
> MM compaction or fragmentation accounting logic. Instead, it provides
> a cheap signal for callers (e.g., shrinkers) that wish to avoid
> overly aggressive reclaim when sufficient free memory exists but
> high-order allocations may still fail.
>
> No functional changes; this is a preparatory helper for future users.
>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> include/linux/vmstat.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/vmstat.h b/include/linux/vmstat.h
> index 3c9c266cf782..568d9f4f1a1f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vmstat.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vmstat.h
> @@ -483,6 +483,19 @@ static inline const char *zone_stat_name(enum zone_stat_item item)
> return vmstat_text[item];
> }
>
> +static inline bool zone_appears_fragmented(struct zone *zone)
> +{
"zone_likely_fragmented" or "zone_maybe_fragmented" might be clearer, depending
on the actual semantics.
> + /*
> + * Simple heuristic: if the number of free pages is more than twice the
> + * high watermark, this strongly suggests that the zone is heavily
> + * fragmented when called from a shrinker.
> + */
I'll cc some more people. But the "when called from a shrinker" bit is
concerning. Are there additional semantics that should be expressed in the
function name, for example?
Something that implies that this function only gives you a reasonable answer in
a certain context.
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-23 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 5:56 [PATCH v2 0/5] mm, drm/ttm, drm/xe: Avoid reclaim/eviction loops under fragmentation Matthew Brost
2026-04-23 5:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: Introduce zone_appears_fragmented() Matthew Brost
2026-04-23 6:04 ` Balbir Singh
2026-04-23 6:16 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-23 6:27 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-23 10:27 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-04-23 11:27 ` Thomas Hellström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76191a17-18bf-4e9b-9ab5-dc9a48abfabb@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox