public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: hca@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com,
	brauner@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
	timmurray@google.com, Minchan Kim <minchan@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] mm: process_mrelease: expedite clean file folio reclaim via mmu_gather
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:56:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b4bf980-4ff3-4f53-8c64-1ba2d85cf1b8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260421230239.172582-2-minchan@kernel.org>

On 4/22/26 01:02, Minchan Kim wrote:

Can we make the subject easier to understand?

"mm: process_mrelease: evict clean file folios when reaping a process"

> Currently, process_mrelease() unmaps pages but file-backed pages are
> not evicted and stay in the pagecache, relying on standard memory reclaim
> (kswapd or direct reclaim) to eventually free them. This delays the
> immediate recovery of system memory under Android's LMKD scenarios,
> leading to redundant background apps kills.
> 
> This patch implements an expedited eviction mechanism for clean pagecache
> folios in the mmu_gather code, similar to how swapcache folios are handled.
> It drops them from the pagecache (i.e., evicting them) if they are completely
> unmapped during reaping.
> 
> Within this single unified loop, anonymous pages are released via
> free_swap_cache(), and file-backed folios are symmetrically released via
> free_file_cache().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h |  2 +-
>  include/linux/swap.h        |  5 ++---
>  mm/mmu_gather.c             |  7 ++++---
>  mm/swap.c                   | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/swap_state.c             | 26 -----------------------
>  5 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h
> index 619fd41e710e..2736dbb571a8 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static inline bool __tlb_remove_folio_pages(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(delay_rmap);
>  	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(page_folio(page) != page_folio(page + nr_pages - 1));
>  
> -	free_pages_and_swap_cache(encoded_pages, ARRAY_SIZE(encoded_pages));
> +	free_pages_and_caches(tlb->mm, encoded_pages, ARRAY_SIZE(encoded_pages));
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> index 62fc7499b408..bdb784966343 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -414,7 +414,9 @@ extern int sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio;
>  extern int sysctl_min_slab_ratio;
>  #endif
>  
> +struct mm_struct;
>  void check_move_unevictable_folios(struct folio_batch *fbatch);
> +void free_pages_and_caches(struct mm_struct *mm, struct encoded_page **pages, int nr);
>  
>  extern void __meminit kswapd_run(int nid);
>  extern void __meminit kswapd_stop(int nid);
> @@ -433,7 +435,6 @@ static inline unsigned long total_swapcache_pages(void)
>  
>  void free_swap_cache(struct folio *folio);
>  void free_folio_and_swap_cache(struct folio *folio);
> -void free_pages_and_swap_cache(struct encoded_page **, int);
>  /* linux/mm/swapfile.c */
>  extern atomic_long_t nr_swap_pages;
>  extern long total_swap_pages;
> @@ -510,8 +511,6 @@ static inline void put_swap_device(struct swap_info_struct *si)
>  	do { (val)->freeswap = (val)->totalswap = 0; } while (0)
>  #define free_folio_and_swap_cache(folio) \
>  	folio_put(folio)
> -#define free_pages_and_swap_cache(pages, nr) \
> -	release_pages((pages), (nr));
>  
>  static inline void free_swap_cache(struct folio *folio)
>  {
> diff --git a/mm/mmu_gather.c b/mm/mmu_gather.c
> index fe5b6a031717..3c6c315d3c48 100644
> --- a/mm/mmu_gather.c
> +++ b/mm/mmu_gather.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,8 @@ void tlb_flush_rmaps(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>   */
>  #define MAX_NR_FOLIOS_PER_FREE		512
>  
> -static void __tlb_batch_free_encoded_pages(struct mmu_gather_batch *batch)
> +static void __tlb_batch_free_encoded_pages(struct mm_struct *mm,
> +		struct mmu_gather_batch *batch)
>  {
>  	struct encoded_page **pages = batch->encoded_pages;
>  	unsigned int nr, nr_pages;
> @@ -135,7 +136,7 @@ static void __tlb_batch_free_encoded_pages(struct mmu_gather_batch *batch)
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> -		free_pages_and_swap_cache(pages, nr);
> +		free_pages_and_caches(mm, pages, nr);
>  		pages += nr;
>  		batch->nr -= nr;
>  
> @@ -148,7 +149,7 @@ static void tlb_batch_pages_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
>  	struct mmu_gather_batch *batch;
>  
>  	for (batch = &tlb->local; batch && batch->nr; batch = batch->next)
> -		__tlb_batch_free_encoded_pages(batch);
> +		__tlb_batch_free_encoded_pages(tlb->mm, batch);
>  	tlb->active = &tlb->local;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
> index bb19ccbece46..e44bc8cefceb 100644
> --- a/mm/swap.c
> +++ b/mm/swap.c
> @@ -1043,6 +1043,48 @@ void release_pages(release_pages_arg arg, int nr)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_pages);
>  
> +static inline void free_file_cache(struct folio *folio)
> +{
> +	if (folio_trylock(folio)) {
> +		mapping_evict_folio(folio_mapping(folio), folio);
> +		folio_unlock(folio);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Passed an array of pages, drop them all from swapcache and then release
> + * them.  They are removed from the LRU and freed if this is their last use.
> + *
> + * If @try_evict_file_folios is true, this function will proactively evict clean
> + * file-backed folios if they are no longer mapped.

There is no such parameter.

But I do wonder if such a parameter would be better than passing in the MM here.

Also, is there a way to avoid moving the function?


-- 
Cheers,

David


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-24  7:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-21 23:02 [PATCH v1 0/3] mm: process_mrelease: expedite clean file folio reclaim and add auto-kill Minchan Kim
2026-04-21 23:02 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] mm: process_mrelease: expedite clean file folio reclaim via mmu_gather Minchan Kim
2026-04-24  7:56   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-04-24 21:24     ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-27  9:29       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-27 22:04         ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-24 19:33   ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-24 21:56     ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-21 23:02 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] mm: process_mrelease: skip LRU movement for exclusive file folios Minchan Kim
2026-04-22  7:22   ` Baolin Wang
2026-04-23 23:38     ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-24  7:51   ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-24  7:57     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 19:15       ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-27  7:16         ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-27 16:48           ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-04-27 17:15             ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-27 23:05               ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-28  6:56                 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-29  1:19                   ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-29  8:18                     ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-29  9:09                       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-29 10:33                         ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-29 13:07                           ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-29 14:44                             ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-29 21:41                         ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-29  8:55                     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-29 21:42                       ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-24 19:26     ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-21 23:02 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] mm: process_mrelease: introduce PROCESS_MRELEASE_REAP_KILL flag Minchan Kim
2026-04-24  7:57   ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-24 22:49     ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-27  7:02       ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-27 22:03         ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-28  7:01           ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-28 22:37             ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-29  8:25               ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-29 20:01                 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-04-29 21:17                   ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-29 21:16                 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-27 20:34   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-04-27 22:52     ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7b4bf980-4ff3-4f53-8c64-1ba2d85cf1b8@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=minchan@google.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=timmurray@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox