From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] mm: kick writeback flusher for IOCB_DONTCACHE with targeted dirty tracking
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 09:53:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7c0880ee25b13f64f71319203fcd7105f54e5ad0.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511-zusieht-amputation-efe8b5058cb7@brauner>
On Mon, 2026-05-11 at 15:24 +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 07:58:29AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > The IOCB_DONTCACHE writeback path in generic_write_sync() calls
> > filemap_flush_range() on every write, submitting writeback inline in
> > the writer's context. Perf lock contention profiling shows the
> > performance problem is not lock contention but the writeback submission
> > work itself — walking the page tree and submitting I/O blocks the writer
> > for milliseconds, inflating p99.9 latency from 23ms (buffered) to 93ms
> > (dontcache).
> >
> > Replace the inline filemap_flush_range() call with a flusher kick that
> > drains dirty pages in the background. This moves writeback submission
> > completely off the writer's hot path.
> >
> > To avoid flushing unrelated buffered dirty data, add a dedicated
> > WB_start_dontcache bit and wb_check_start_dontcache() handler that uses
> > the per-wb WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY counter to determine how many pages to
> > write back. The flusher writes back that many pages from the oldest dirty
> > inodes (not restricted to dontcache-specific inodes). This helps
> > preserve I/O batching while limiting the scope of expedited writeback.
> >
> > Like WB_start_all, the WB_start_dontcache bit coalesces multiple
> > DONTCACHE writes into a single flusher wakeup without per-write
> > allocations. Use test_and_clear_bit to atomically consume the kick
> > request before reading the dirty counter and starting writeback, so that
> > concurrent DONTCACHE writes during writeback can re-set the bit and
> > schedule a follow-up flusher run.
> >
> > Read the dirty counter with wb_stat_sum() (aggregating per-CPU batches)
> > rather than wb_stat() (which reads only the global counter) to ensure
> > small writes below the percpu batch threshold are visible to the flusher.
> >
> > In filemap_dontcache_kick_writeback(), set the WB_start_dontcache bit
> > inside the unlocked_inode_to_wb_begin/end section for correct cgroup
> > writeback domain targeting, but defer the wb_wakeup() call until after
> > the section ends, since wb_wakeup() uses spin_unlock_irq() which would
> > unconditionally re-enable interrupts while the i_pages xa_lock may still
> > be held under irqsave during a cgroup writeback switch. Pin the wb with
> > wb_get() inside the RCU critical section before calling wb_wakeup()
> > outside it, since cgroup bdi_writeback structures are RCU-freed and the
> > wb pointer could become invalid after unlocked_inode_to_wb_end() drops
> > the RCU read lock.
> >
> > Also add WB_REASON_DONTCACHE as a new writeback reason for tracing
> > visibility.
> >
> > dontcache-bench results (same host, T6F_SKL_1920GBF, 251 GiB RAM,
> > xfs on NVMe, fio io_uring):
> >
> > Buffered and direct I/O paths are unaffected by this patchset. All
> > improvements are confined to the dontcache path:
> >
> > Single-stream throughput (MB/s):
> > Before After Change
> > seq-write/dontcache 298 897 +201%
> > rand-write/dontcache 131 236 +80%
> >
> > Tail latency improvements (seq-write/dontcache):
> > p99: 135,266 us -> 23,986 us (-82%)
> > p99.9: 8,925,479 us -> 28,443 us (-99.7%)
> >
> > Multi-writer (4 jobs, sequential write):
> > Before After Change
> > dontcache aggregate (MB/s) 2,529 4,532 +79%
> > dontcache p99 (us) 8,553 1,002 -88%
> > dontcache p99.9 (us) 109,314 1,057 -99%
> >
> > Dontcache multi-writer throughput now matches buffered (4,532 vs
> > 4,616 MB/s).
> >
> > 32-file write (Axboe test):
> > Before After Change
> > dontcache aggregate (MB/s) 1,548 3,499 +126%
> > dontcache p99 (us) 10,170 602 -94%
> > Peak dirty pages (MB) 1,837 213 -88%
> >
> > Dontcache now reaches 81% of buffered throughput (was 35%).
> >
> > Competing writers (dontcache vs buffered, separate files):
> > Before After
> > buffered writer 868 433 MB/s
> > dontcache writer 415 433 MB/s
> > Aggregate 1,284 866 MB/s
> >
> > Previously the buffered writer starved the dontcache writer 2:1.
> > With per-bdi_writeback tracking, both writers now receive equal
> > bandwidth. The aggregate matches the buffered-vs-buffered baseline
> > (863 MB/s), indicating fair sharing regardless of I/O mode.
> >
> > The dontcache writer's p99.9 latency collapsed from 119 ms to
> > 33 ms (-73%), eliminating the severe periodic stalls seen in the
> > baseline. Both writers now share identical latency profiles,
> > matching the buffered-vs-buffered pattern.
> >
> > The per-bdi_writeback dirty tracking dramatically reduces peak dirty
> > pages in dontcache workloads, with the 32-file test dropping from
> > 1.8 GB to 213 MB. Dontcache sequential write throughput triples and
> > multi-writer throughput reaches parity with buffered I/O, with tail
> > latencies collapsing by 1-2 orders of magnitude.
> >
> > Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-6
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/fs-writeback.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h | 2 ++
> > include/linux/fs.h | 6 ++--
> > include/trace/events/writeback.h | 3 +-
> > 4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> > index 32ecc745f5f7..77d53df97cc3 100644
> > --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> > +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> > @@ -2377,6 +2377,27 @@ static long wb_check_start_all(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> > return nr_pages;
> > }
> >
> > +static long wb_check_start_dontcache(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> > +{
> > + long nr_pages;
> > +
> > + if (!test_and_clear_bit(WB_start_dontcache, &wb->state))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + nr_pages = wb_stat_sum(wb, WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY);
> > + if (nr_pages) {
> > + struct wb_writeback_work work = {
> > + .nr_pages = nr_pages,
> > + .sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE,
> > + .range_cyclic = 1,
> > + .reason = WB_REASON_DONTCACHE,
> > + };
> > +
> > + nr_pages = wb_writeback(wb, &work);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return nr_pages;
> > +}
> >
> > /*
> > * Retrieve work items and do the writeback they describe
> > @@ -2398,6 +2419,11 @@ static long wb_do_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> > */
> > wrote += wb_check_start_all(wb);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Check for dontcache writeback request
> > + */
> > + wrote += wb_check_start_dontcache(wb);
> > +
> > /*
> > * Check for periodic writeback, kupdated() style
> > */
> > @@ -2472,6 +2498,43 @@ void wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * filemap_dontcache_kick_writeback - kick flusher for IOCB_DONTCACHE writes
> > + * @mapping: address_space that was just written to
> > + *
> > + * Kick the writeback flusher thread to expedite writeback of dontcache dirty
> > + * pages. Queue writeback for the inode's wb for as many pages as there are
> > + * dontcache pages, but don't restrict writeback to dontcache pages only.
> > + *
> > + * This significantly improves performance over either writing all wb's pages
> > + * or writing only dontcache pages. Although it doesn't guarantee quick
> > + * writeback and reclaim of dontcache pages, it keeps the amount of dirty pages
> > + * in check. Over longer term dontcache pages get written and reclaimed by
> > + * background writeback even with this rough heuristic.
> > + */
> > +void filemap_dontcache_kick_writeback(struct address_space *mapping)
> > +{
> > + struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> > + struct bdi_writeback *wb;
> > + struct wb_lock_cookie cookie = {};
> > + bool need_wakeup = false;
> > +
> > + wb = unlocked_inode_to_wb_begin(inode, &cookie);
> > + if (wb_has_dirty_io(wb) &&
> > + !test_bit(WB_start_dontcache, &wb->state) &&
> > + !test_and_set_bit(WB_start_dontcache, &wb->state)) {
>
> Doesn't test_and_set_bit() return the old value? IOW, if it sees that
> WB_start_dontcache was already set it'll return true? So you can remove
> the test_bit() call, right?
>
Yes.
> > + wb_get(wb);
> > + need_wakeup = true;
> > + }
>
> Actually, I think you can rewrite this function quite a bit:
>
>
> > + unlocked_inode_to_wb_end(inode, &cookie);
> > +
> > + if (need_wakeup) {
> > + wb_wakeup(wb);
> > + wb_put(wb);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(filemap_dontcache_kick_writeback);
>
> void filemap_dontcache_kick_writeback(struct address_space *mapping)
> {
> struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> struct bdi_writeback *wb;
> struct wb_lock_cookie cookie = {};
>
> wb = unlocked_inode_to_wb_begin(inode, &cookie);
> if (wb_has_dirty_io(wb) && !test_and_set_bit(WB_start_dontcache, &wb->state))
> wb_get(wb);
> else
> wb = NULL;
> unlocked_inode_to_wb_end(inode, &cookie);
>
> if (wb) {
> wb_wakeup(wb);
> wb_put(wb);
> }
> }
>
> No?
>
That does look much cleaner. Do you want to just make that change or
would you rather I resend?
Thanks!
> > +
> > /*
> > * Wakeup the flusher threads to start writeback of all currently dirty pages
> > */
> > diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h b/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
> > index cb660dd37286..4f1084937315 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ enum wb_state {
> > WB_writeback_running, /* Writeback is in progress */
> > WB_has_dirty_io, /* Dirty inodes on ->b_{dirty|io|more_io} */
> > WB_start_all, /* nr_pages == 0 (all) work pending */
> > + WB_start_dontcache, /* dontcache writeback pending */
> > };
> >
> > enum wb_stat_item {
> > @@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ enum wb_reason {
> > */
> > WB_REASON_FORKER_THREAD,
> > WB_REASON_FOREIGN_FLUSH,
> > + WB_REASON_DONTCACHE,
> >
> > WB_REASON_MAX,
> > };
> > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > index 11559c513dfb..df72b42a9e9b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > @@ -2624,6 +2624,7 @@ extern int __must_check file_write_and_wait_range(struct file *file,
> > loff_t start, loff_t end);
> > int filemap_flush_range(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t start,
> > loff_t end);
> > +void filemap_dontcache_kick_writeback(struct address_space *mapping);
> >
> > static inline int file_write_and_wait(struct file *file)
> > {
> > @@ -2657,10 +2658,7 @@ static inline ssize_t generic_write_sync(struct kiocb *iocb, ssize_t count)
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> > } else if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DONTCACHE) {
> > - struct address_space *mapping = iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping;
> > -
> > - filemap_flush_range(mapping, iocb->ki_pos - count,
> > - iocb->ki_pos - 1);
> > + filemap_dontcache_kick_writeback(iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping);
> > }
> >
> > return count;
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/writeback.h b/include/trace/events/writeback.h
> > index bdac0d685a98..13ee076ccd16 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/events/writeback.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/writeback.h
> > @@ -44,7 +44,8 @@
> > EM( WB_REASON_PERIODIC, "periodic") \
> > EM( WB_REASON_FS_FREE_SPACE, "fs_free_space") \
> > EM( WB_REASON_FORKER_THREAD, "forker_thread") \
> > - EMe(WB_REASON_FOREIGN_FLUSH, "foreign_flush")
> > + EM( WB_REASON_FOREIGN_FLUSH, "foreign_flush") \
> > + EMe(WB_REASON_DONTCACHE, "dontcache")
> >
> > WB_WORK_REASON
> >
> >
> > --
> > 2.54.0
> >
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 11:58 [PATCH v7 0/3] mm: improve write performance with RWF_DONTCACHE Jeff Layton
2026-05-11 11:58 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] mm: preserve PG_dropbehind flag during folio split Jeff Layton
2026-05-11 12:38 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-12 13:58 ` Jan Kara
2026-05-11 11:58 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] mm: track DONTCACHE dirty pages per bdi_writeback Jeff Layton
2026-05-11 13:10 ` Christian Brauner
2026-05-11 13:29 ` Jeff Layton
2026-05-11 13:34 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-12 14:07 ` Jan Kara
2026-05-11 11:58 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] mm: kick writeback flusher for IOCB_DONTCACHE with targeted dirty tracking Jeff Layton
2026-05-11 13:24 ` Christian Brauner
2026-05-11 13:53 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2026-05-11 14:06 ` Christian Brauner
2026-05-12 14:17 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7c0880ee25b13f64f71319203fcd7105f54e5ad0.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox