From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>, Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@google.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Matteo Rizzo <matteorizzo@google.com>,
GONG Ruiqi <gongruiqi1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] slab: support for compiler-assisted type-based slab cache partitioning
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 23:22:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afkOMIPu1WNFE9MS@elver.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f2bd63a-dc02-4631-a3a5-7ec8e58a4a4e@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 03:03PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
> On 4/24/26 15:24, Marco Elver wrote:
>
> > @@ -938,7 +968,7 @@ void *__kmalloc_large_node_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
> > * Try really hard to succeed the allocation but fail
> > * eventually.
> > */
> > -static __always_inline __alloc_size(1) void *kmalloc_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> > +static __always_inline __alloc_size(1) void *_kmalloc_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t flags, kmalloc_token_t token)
> > {
> > if (__builtin_constant_p(size) && size) {
> > unsigned int index;
> > @@ -948,14 +978,16 @@ static __always_inline __alloc_size(1) void *kmalloc_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t f
> >
> > index = kmalloc_index(size);
> > return __kmalloc_cache_noprof(
> > - kmalloc_caches[kmalloc_type(flags, _RET_IP_)][index],
> > + kmalloc_caches[kmalloc_type(flags, token)][index],
>
> While reviewing this, it occured to me we might have been using _RET_IP_
> here in a suboptimal way ever since this was introduced. Since this is all
> inlined, shouldn't have we been using _THIS_IP_ to really randomize using
> the kmalloc() callsite, and not its parent?
>
> And after this patch, we get the token passed to _kmalloc_noprof()...
>
> > flags, size);
> > }
> > - return __kmalloc_noprof(size, flags);
> > + return __kmalloc_noprof(PASS_KMALLOC_PARAMS(size, NULL, token), flags);
>
> ... and used also here for the non-constant-size, where previously
> __kmalloc_noprof() (not inline function) would correctly use _RET_IP_ on its
> own ...
>
> > }
> > +#define kmalloc_noprof(...) _kmalloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, __kmalloc_token(__VA_ARGS__))
>
> ... and the token comes from here. With random partitioning that's
> #define __kmalloc_token(...) ((kmalloc_token_t){ .v = _RET_IP_ })
>
> so that AFAIK makes the situation worse as now the cases without constant
> size also start randomizing by the parent callsite and not the kmalloc callsite.
>
> But there are many users of __kmalloc_token() and maybe some are corrent in
> using _RET_IP_, I haven't checked, maybe we'll need two variants, or further
> change things around.
Good catch. I don't think we need multiple variants (otherwise the TYPED
variant would be broken) - we're moving token generation to the callers
(not even inlined anymore) with all this macro magic.
I think this is all we need:
--- a/include/linux/slab.h
+++ b/include/linux/slab.h
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ int kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *s);
typedef struct { unsigned long v; } kmalloc_token_t;
#ifdef CONFIG_KMALLOC_PARTITION_RANDOM
extern unsigned long random_kmalloc_seed;
-#define __kmalloc_token(...) ((kmalloc_token_t){ .v = _RET_IP_ })
+#define __kmalloc_token(...) ((kmalloc_token_t){ .v = _THIS_IP_ })
#elif defined(CONFIG_KMALLOC_PARTITION_TYPED)
#define __kmalloc_token(...) ((kmalloc_token_t){ .v = __builtin_infer_alloc_token(__VA_ARGS__) })
#endif
Plus a paragraph in the commit message. Let me add that.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-04 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 13:24 [PATCH v3 1/2] slab: support for compiler-assisted type-based slab cache partitioning Marco Elver
2026-04-24 13:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] slab: fix kernel-docs for mm-api Marco Elver
2026-04-30 13:40 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-04-30 13:59 ` Marco Elver
2026-05-04 15:00 ` Marco Elver
2026-04-30 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] slab: support for compiler-assisted type-based slab cache partitioning Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-05-04 21:22 ` Marco Elver [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afkOMIPu1WNFE9MS@elver.google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gongruiqi1@huawei.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=matteorizzo@google.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=revest@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox