From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: "Qi Zheng" <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David Carlier" <devnexen@gmail.com>,
"Allen Pais" <apais@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Axel Rasmussen" <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
"Baoquan He" <bhe@redhat.com>,
"Chengming Zhou" <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
"Chen Ridong" <chenridong@huawei.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Hamza Mahfooz" <hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Harry Yoo" <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>,
"Imran Khan" <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Kamalesh Babulal" <kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com>,
"Lance Yang" <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
"Liam Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
"Muchun Song" <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
"Nhat Pham" <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Usama Arif" <usamaarif642@gmail.com>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Wei Xu" <weixugc@google.com>, "Yosry Ahmed" <yosry@kernel.org>,
"Yuanchu Xie" <yuanchu@google.com>, "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Usama Arif" <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [mm] 01b9da291c: stress-ng.switch.ops_per_sec 67.7% regression
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 07:22:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agxxuHOfNLX-32kI@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <agvvRNJTAtNkCVZc@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
Hi Oliver,
On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 01:04:04PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> hi, Shakeel,
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 10:54:20AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 09:39:00AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 12:38:48PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > > > On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 08:55:50PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> > > > > hi, Shakeel, hi, Qi,
> > > > >
> > > > > #2: when we test above patch, we found the server easy to crash while running
> > > > > tests. we try to run up to 20 times, only 2 of them run successfully (above
> > > > > 37739220 is just the average data from these 2 runs, since the data is stable,
> > > > > we think maybe it's ok to report to you with this data).
> > > > > we also noticed for [1] there is a [syzbot ci] report in [2]. since we don't
> > > > > have serial output for our test server in this report which is for performance
> > > > > tests, we cannot say if other 18 runs failed due to similar reason. just FYI.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The syzbot report is simply a rcu warning which will be fixed in v2. Do you
> > > > have more details on the crash you are seeing? Is it page counter underflow
> > > > warning?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again for the help.
> > >
> > > Hi Oliver, it seems like sashiko found another issue with v2, so, if you have
> > > not yet started the test, you can skip it.
>
> firstly, let me still give you an update about v2. I applied it directly on top
> of 01b9da291c, found it can recover the performance.
>
> =========================================================================================
> compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/method/nr_threads/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase/testtime:
> gcc-14/performance/x86_64-rhel-9.4/mq/100%/debian-13-x86_64-20250902.cgz/lkp-spr-r02/switch/stress-ng/60s
>
> commit:
> 8285917d6f ("mm: memcontrol: prepare for reparenting non-hierarchical stats")
> 01b9da291c ("mm: memcontrol: convert objcg to be per-memcg per-node type")
> 8da1b1ea43 ("memcg: cache obj_stock by memcg, not by objcg pointer") <---- v2
>
> 8285917d6f383aef 01b9da291c4969354807b52956f 8da1b1ea4344c152a3892cbb132
> ---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
> %stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev
> \ | \ | \
> 5849 +210.2% 18145 ± 3% +0.8% 5896 stress-ng.switch.nanosecs_per_context_switch_mq_method
> 2.296e+09 -67.7% 7.408e+08 ± 3% -0.8% 2.278e+09 stress-ng.switch.ops
> 38288993 -67.7% 12355813 ± 3% -0.8% 37987427 stress-ng.switch.ops_per_sec
>
> but since this version is out-of-date now, I won't give out the full
> comparison. if you still want it, please let me know.
>
Thanks a lot and this is good enough.
> > >
> > > Also I am rethinking the approach, so I will send a prototype in response on
> > > this email for which I will need your help in testing.
> >
> > Hi Oliver, can you please test the following patch?
>
> got it. will change to test following patch. and this looks quite different
> with v2 or v3, so if you still want us to test v3, please let me know. thanks!
>
No need to test v3 as it is similar to v2. Please test the following patch as it
is a direction I want to pursue and wanted an early signal if this is the right
direction.
> >
> > From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
> > Subject: [PATCH] memcg: shrink obj_stock_pcp and cache multiple objcgs
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
> > ---
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 213 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 156 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index d978e18b9b2d..2a9e5136a956 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -150,14 +150,14 @@ static void obj_cgroup_release(struct percpu_ref *ref)
> > * However, it can be PAGE_SIZE or (x * PAGE_SIZE).
> > *
> > * The following sequence can lead to it:
> > - * 1) CPU0: objcg == stock->cached_objcg
> > + * 1) CPU0: objcg cached in one of stock->cached[i]
> > * 2) CPU1: we do a small allocation (e.g. 92 bytes),
> > * PAGE_SIZE bytes are charged
> > * 3) CPU1: a process from another memcg is allocating something,
> > * the stock if flushed,
> > * objcg->nr_charged_bytes = PAGE_SIZE - 92
> > * 5) CPU0: we do release this object,
> > - * 92 bytes are added to stock->nr_bytes
> > + * 92 bytes are added to stock->nr_bytes[i]
> > * 6) CPU0: stock is flushed,
> > * 92 bytes are added to objcg->nr_charged_bytes
> > *
> > @@ -2017,13 +2017,25 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct memcg_stock_pcp, memcg_stock) = {
> > .lock = INIT_LOCAL_TRYLOCK(lock),
> > };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * NR_OBJ_STOCK is sized so the entire hot path of obj_stock_pcp
> > + * (lock, accounting metadata, nr_bytes[] and cached[]) fits within a
> > + * single 64-byte cache line on non-debug 64-bit builds. With 5 slots:
> > + * lock(1) + index(1) + node_id(2) + slab stats(4) + nr_bytes(10)
> > + * + pad(6) + cached(40) == 64 bytes.
> > + * A CPU can thus consume/refill/account against five different objcgs
> > + * (typically per-node variants of the same memcg) while incurring at
> > + * most one cache miss on the stock.
> > + */
> > +#define NR_OBJ_STOCK 5
> > struct obj_stock_pcp {
> > local_trylock_t lock;
> > - unsigned int nr_bytes;
> > - struct obj_cgroup *cached_objcg;
> > - struct pglist_data *cached_pgdat;
> > - int nr_slab_reclaimable_b;
> > - int nr_slab_unreclaimable_b;
> > + int8_t index;
> > + int16_t node_id;
> > + int16_t nr_slab_reclaimable_b;
> > + int16_t nr_slab_unreclaimable_b;
> > + uint16_t nr_bytes[NR_OBJ_STOCK];
> > + struct obj_cgroup *cached[NR_OBJ_STOCK];
> >
> > struct work_struct work;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > @@ -2031,10 +2043,13 @@ struct obj_stock_pcp {
> >
> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct obj_stock_pcp, obj_stock) = {
> > .lock = INIT_LOCAL_TRYLOCK(lock),
> > + .index = -1,
> > + .node_id = NUMA_NO_NODE,
> > };
> >
> > static DEFINE_MUTEX(percpu_charge_mutex);
> >
> > +static void drain_obj_stock_slot(struct obj_stock_pcp *stock, int i);
> > static void drain_obj_stock(struct obj_stock_pcp *stock);
> > static bool obj_stock_flush_required(struct obj_stock_pcp *stock,
> > struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg);
> > @@ -3152,39 +3167,68 @@ static void unlock_stock(struct obj_stock_pcp *stock)
> > local_unlock(&obj_stock.lock);
> > }
> >
> > -/* Call after __refill_obj_stock() to ensure stock->cached_objg == objcg */
> > +/* Call after __refill_obj_stock() so a slot for objcg exists in the stock */
> > static void __account_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
> > struct obj_stock_pcp *stock, int nr,
> > struct pglist_data *pgdat, enum node_stat_item idx)
> > {
> > - int *bytes;
> > + int16_t *bytes;
> > + int i;
> >
> > - if (!stock || READ_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg) != objcg)
> > + /*
> > + * node_id is stored as int16_t and -1 is used as the "no pgdat
> > + * cached" sentinel, so MAX_NUMNODES must fit in a positive int16_t.
> > + */
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_NUMNODES >= S16_MAX);
> > +
> > + if (!stock)
> > + goto direct;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < NR_OBJ_STOCK; ++i) {
> > + if (READ_ONCE(stock->cached[i]) == objcg)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + if (i == NR_OBJ_STOCK)
> > goto direct;
> >
> > /*
> > * Save vmstat data in stock and skip vmstat array update unless
> > - * accumulating over a page of vmstat data or when pgdat changes.
> > + * accumulating over a page of vmstat data or when the objcg slot or
> > + * pgdat the stats belong to changes.
> > */
> > - if (stock->cached_pgdat != pgdat) {
> > - /* Flush the existing cached vmstat data */
> > - struct pglist_data *oldpg = stock->cached_pgdat;
> > + if (stock->index < 0) {
> > + stock->index = i;
> > + stock->node_id = pgdat->node_id;
> > + } else if (stock->index != i || stock->node_id != pgdat->node_id) {
> > + struct obj_cgroup *old = READ_ONCE(stock->cached[stock->index]);
> > + struct pglist_data *oldpg = NODE_DATA(stock->node_id);
> >
> > if (stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b) {
> > - mod_objcg_mlstate(objcg, oldpg, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B,
> > + mod_objcg_mlstate(old, oldpg, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B,
> > stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b);
> > stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b = 0;
> > }
> > if (stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b) {
> > - mod_objcg_mlstate(objcg, oldpg, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B,
> > + mod_objcg_mlstate(old, oldpg, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B,
> > stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b);
> > stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b = 0;
> > }
> > - stock->cached_pgdat = pgdat;
> > + stock->index = i;
> > + stock->node_id = pgdat->node_id;
> > }
> >
> > bytes = (idx == NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B) ? &stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b
> > : &stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b;
> > + /*
> > + * Cached stats are int16_t; flush directly if accumulating @nr would
> > + * overflow or underflow the cache.
> > + */
> > + if (abs(nr + *bytes) >= S16_MAX) {
> > + nr += *bytes;
> > + *bytes = 0;
> > + goto direct;
> > + }
> > +
> > /*
> > * Even for large object >= PAGE_SIZE, the vmstat data will still be
> > * cached locally at least once before pushing it out.
> > @@ -3210,10 +3254,16 @@ static bool __consume_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
> > struct obj_stock_pcp *stock,
> > unsigned int nr_bytes)
> > {
> > - if (objcg == READ_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg) &&
> > - stock->nr_bytes >= nr_bytes) {
> > - stock->nr_bytes -= nr_bytes;
> > - return true;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < NR_OBJ_STOCK; ++i) {
> > + if (READ_ONCE(stock->cached[i]) != objcg)
> > + continue;
> > + if (stock->nr_bytes[i] >= nr_bytes) {
> > + stock->nr_bytes[i] -= nr_bytes;
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > + return false;
> > }
> >
> > return false;
> > @@ -3234,16 +3284,42 @@ static bool consume_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, unsigned int nr_bytes)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -static void drain_obj_stock(struct obj_stock_pcp *stock)
> > +/* Flush the cached slab stats (if any) back to their owning objcg/pgdat. */
> > +static void drain_obj_stock_stats(struct obj_stock_pcp *stock)
> > +{
> > + struct obj_cgroup *old;
> > + struct pglist_data *oldpg;
> > +
> > + if (stock->index < 0)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + old = READ_ONCE(stock->cached[stock->index]);
> > + oldpg = NODE_DATA(stock->node_id);
> > +
> > + if (stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b) {
> > + mod_objcg_mlstate(old, oldpg, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B,
> > + stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b);
> > + stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b = 0;
> > + }
> > + if (stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b) {
> > + mod_objcg_mlstate(old, oldpg, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B,
> > + stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b);
> > + stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b = 0;
> > + }
> > + stock->index = -1;
> > + stock->node_id = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void drain_obj_stock_slot(struct obj_stock_pcp *stock, int i)
> > {
> > - struct obj_cgroup *old = READ_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg);
> > + struct obj_cgroup *old = READ_ONCE(stock->cached[i]);
> >
> > if (!old)
> > return;
> >
> > - if (stock->nr_bytes) {
> > - unsigned int nr_pages = stock->nr_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > - unsigned int nr_bytes = stock->nr_bytes & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> > + if (stock->nr_bytes[i]) {
> > + unsigned int nr_pages = stock->nr_bytes[i] >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > + unsigned int nr_bytes = stock->nr_bytes[i] & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> >
> > if (nr_pages) {
> > struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> > @@ -3269,44 +3345,43 @@ static void drain_obj_stock(struct obj_stock_pcp *stock)
> > * so it might be changed in the future.
> > */
> > atomic_add(nr_bytes, &old->nr_charged_bytes);
> > - stock->nr_bytes = 0;
> > + stock->nr_bytes[i] = 0;
> > }
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Flush the vmstat data in current stock
> > - */
> > - if (stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b || stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b) {
> > - if (stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b) {
> > - mod_objcg_mlstate(old, stock->cached_pgdat,
> > - NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B,
> > - stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b);
> > - stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b = 0;
> > - }
> > - if (stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b) {
> > - mod_objcg_mlstate(old, stock->cached_pgdat,
> > - NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B,
> > - stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b);
> > - stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b = 0;
> > - }
> > - stock->cached_pgdat = NULL;
> > - }
> > + /* Flush vmstat data when its owning slot is being drained. */
> > + if (stock->index == i)
> > + drain_obj_stock_stats(stock);
> >
> > - WRITE_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg, NULL);
> > + WRITE_ONCE(stock->cached[i], NULL);
> > obj_cgroup_put(old);
> > }
> >
> > +static void drain_obj_stock(struct obj_stock_pcp *stock)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < NR_OBJ_STOCK; ++i)
> > + drain_obj_stock_slot(stock, i);
> > +}
> > +
> > static bool obj_stock_flush_required(struct obj_stock_pcp *stock,
> > struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg)
> > {
> > - struct obj_cgroup *objcg = READ_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg);
> > + struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
> > struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> > bool flush = false;
> > + int i;
> >
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > - if (objcg) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < NR_OBJ_STOCK; ++i) {
> > + objcg = READ_ONCE(stock->cached[i]);
> > + if (!objcg)
> > + continue;
> > memcg = obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg);
> > - if (memcg && mem_cgroup_is_descendant(memcg, root_memcg))
> > + if (memcg && mem_cgroup_is_descendant(memcg, root_memcg)) {
> > flush = true;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > }
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > @@ -3319,6 +3394,8 @@ static void __refill_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
> > bool allow_uncharge)
> > {
> > unsigned int nr_pages = 0;
> > + unsigned int stock_nr_bytes;
> > + int i, slot = -1, empty_slot = -1;
> >
> > if (!stock) {
> > nr_pages = nr_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > @@ -3327,21 +3404,43 @@ static void __refill_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > - if (READ_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg) != objcg) { /* reset if necessary */
> > - drain_obj_stock(stock);
> > + for (i = 0; i < NR_OBJ_STOCK; ++i) {
> > + struct obj_cgroup *cached = READ_ONCE(stock->cached[i]);
> > +
> > + if (!cached) {
> > + if (empty_slot == -1)
> > + empty_slot = i;
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > + if (cached == objcg) {
> > + slot = i;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (slot == -1) {
> > + slot = empty_slot;
> > + if (slot == -1) {
> > + slot = get_random_u32_below(NR_OBJ_STOCK);
> > + drain_obj_stock_slot(stock, slot);
> > + }
> > obj_cgroup_get(objcg);
> > - stock->nr_bytes = atomic_read(&objcg->nr_charged_bytes)
> > + stock->nr_bytes[slot] = atomic_read(&objcg->nr_charged_bytes)
> > ? atomic_xchg(&objcg->nr_charged_bytes, 0) : 0;
> > - WRITE_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg, objcg);
> > + WRITE_ONCE(stock->cached[slot], objcg);
> >
> > allow_uncharge = true; /* Allow uncharge when objcg changes */
> > }
> > - stock->nr_bytes += nr_bytes;
> >
> > - if (allow_uncharge && (stock->nr_bytes > PAGE_SIZE)) {
> > - nr_pages = stock->nr_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > - stock->nr_bytes &= (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> > + stock_nr_bytes = (unsigned int)stock->nr_bytes[slot] + nr_bytes;
> > +
> > + /* nr_bytes[] is uint16_t; flush if we would refill >= U16_MAX. */
> > + if ((allow_uncharge && (stock_nr_bytes > PAGE_SIZE)) ||
> > + stock_nr_bytes >= U16_MAX) {
> > + nr_pages = stock_nr_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > + stock_nr_bytes &= (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> > }
> > + stock->nr_bytes[slot] = stock_nr_bytes;
> >
> > out:
> > if (nr_pages)
> > --
> > 2.53.0-Meta
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-19 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 12:56 [linus:master] [mm] 01b9da291c: stress-ng.switch.ops_per_sec 67.7% regression kernel test robot
2026-05-12 16:03 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-05-13 2:10 ` Qi Zheng
2026-05-13 13:49 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-05-13 14:27 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-05-14 7:46 ` Qi Zheng
2026-05-14 13:40 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-05-15 7:37 ` Qi Zheng
2026-05-15 17:09 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-05-17 12:55 ` Oliver Sang
2026-05-17 19:38 ` Shakeel Butt
[not found] ` <agtATZG9mIlYzMUl@linux.dev>
[not found] ` <agtPMpQK2jXdQAY4@linux.dev>
2026-05-19 5:04 ` Oliver Sang
2026-05-19 14:22 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agxxuHOfNLX-32kI@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apais@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
--cc=hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
--cc=kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yosry@kernel.org \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox