From: Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, chrisl@kernel.org,
usama.arif@linux.dev, kasong@tencent.com, nphamcs@gmail.com,
shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, youngjun.park@lge.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: better block swap batching and a different take on swap_ops v2
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 21:29:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ah2JOjCiDqXvPci_@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601113449.3464734-1-hch@lst.de>
Hi Christoph,
On 06/01/26 at 01:34pm, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series makes use of the swap_iocb for block as well so that it
> doesn't do inefficient single-bio I/O, and then rebases the swap_ops
> from Baoquan on top of the now very different method structure.
What tree is this series based on? I tried the latest mainline,
linux-next main branch and Andrew's mm-unstable, all failed.
And by the way, usually we add version number in each patch's subject as
"[PATCH v2] xxx ".
Thanks
Baoquan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-01 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-01 11:34 better block swap batching and a different take on swap_ops v2 Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-01 11:34 ` [PATCH 1/8] shmem: provide a shmem_write_folio wrapper Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-01 11:34 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm: merge writeout into pageout Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-01 11:34 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm/swap: introduce struct swap_io_ctx Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-01 11:34 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm/swap: also use struct swap_iocb for block I/O Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-01 11:34 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm/swap: remove count_swpout_vm_event Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-01 11:34 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/swap: use swap_ops to register swap device's methods Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-01 11:34 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm/swap: remove SWP_FS_OPS Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-01 11:34 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm/vmstat: add NRSWP{IN,OUT} counters Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-01 13:29 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2026-06-01 14:50 ` better block swap batching and a different take on swap_ops v2 Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-01 15:17 ` Baoquan He
2026-06-01 15:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ah2JOjCiDqXvPci_@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=youngjun.park@lge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox