From: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Adithya Jayachandran <ajayachandra@nvidia.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Josh Hilke <jrhilke@google.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>, William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/12] PCI: liveupdate: Track incoming preserved PCI devices
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 22:38:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajHOd1lkBJTySVif@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALzav=eo=UwoTNTYM8Z7uKoihxfB7NtVP701qidVgoqyBKhUig@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 03:20:33PM -0700, David Matlack wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 1:09 PM Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com> wrote:
>>
[snip]
>>
>> Hmm.. This is interesting, so the KHO state is freed and it cannot be
>> reused. I see you already pointed out that we are putting an LUO policy
>> to say that the retry is not allowed.
>>
>> But what should be the behaviour of liveupdate in this regard? Let the
>> system boot in a normal way? This might break other subsystems as they
>> might depend on PCIe restoring state properly. Also I think some of the
>> PCIe state, like device-id, BAR addresses, ACLs etc, might be used as
>> source of truth by other components.
>>
>> For example, lets say FLB retrieve() of PCIe fails, but succeeds for
>> VFIO/IOMMU, now VFIO/IOMMU are restoring state of a device that is not
>> restored/preserved?
>>
>> Should this be considered fatal?
>
>If PCI FLB retrieve fails then there are certain things that cannot be
>guaranteed, such as BDF (B specifically) remaining constant. This
>could lead to memory corruption as the IOMMU may have live
>translations in place for those specific RequesterIDs. And, in the
>future, preserved devices may be doing P2P which depends on BARs not
>moving. If the PCI core cannot retrieve the FLB saved by the previous
>kernel, it cannot make these guarantees.
Yes, this is what I was worried about.
>
>So yeah I think you're right that PCI core should treat FLB retrieve
>as fatal and just panic.
This sounds great.
>
>> > }
>> >
>> > static void pci_flb_finish(struct liveupdate_flb_op_args *args)
>> > {
>> >- kho_restore_free(args->obj);
>> >+ struct pci_flb_incoming *incoming = args->obj;
>> >+
>> >+ xa_destroy(&incoming->xa);
>> >+ kho_restore_free(incoming->ser);
>> >+ kfree(incoming);
>> > }
>> >
>> > static struct liveupdate_flb_ops pci_liveupdate_flb_ops = {
>> >@@ -270,6 +335,91 @@ void pci_liveupdate_unpreserve(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> > }
>> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_liveupdate_unpreserve);
>> >
>> >+static struct pci_flb_incoming *pci_liveupdate_flb_get_incoming(void)
>> >+{
>> >+ struct pci_flb_incoming *incoming = NULL;
>> >+ int ret;
>> >+
>> >+ ret = liveupdate_flb_get_incoming(&pci_liveupdate_flb, (void **)&incoming);
>> >+
>> >+ /* Live Update is not enabled. */
>> >+ if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> >+ return NULL;
>> >+
>> >+ /* Live Update is enabled, but there is no incoming FLB data. */
>> >+ if (ret == -ENODATA)
>> >+ return NULL;
>> >+
>> >+ /*
>> >+ * Live Update is enabled and there is incoming FLB data, but none of it
>> >+ * matches pci_liveupdate_flb.compatible.
>> >+ *
>> >+ * This could mean that no PCI FLB data was passed by the previous
>> >+ * kernel, but it could also mean the previous kernel used a different
>> >+ * compatibility string (i.e. a different ABI).
>> >+ */
>> >+ if (ret == -ENOENT) {
>> >+ pr_info_once("No incoming FLB matched %s\n", pci_liveupdate_flb.compatible);
>> >+ return NULL;
>> >+ }
>> >+
>> >+ /*
>> >+ * There is incoming FLB data that matches pci_liveupdate_flb.compatible
>> >+ * but it cannot be retrieved.
>> >+ */
>> >+ if (ret) {
>> >+ WARN_ONCE(ret, "Failed to retrieve incoming FLB data\n");
>>
>> I think this should probably be considered fatal as mentioned above or
>> the caller of this function should get an error so it can fail. I think
>> retrievel of preserved state should generally not fail unless there is
>> memory corruption or ABI is incompatible.
>
>Yeah. I think I will just call panic() here to cover all cases.
We have an luo specific panic macro/function that you can use.
luo_restore_fail()
>
>> >+ return NULL;
>> >+ }
>> >+
>> >+ return incoming;
>> >+}
>> >+
>>
>> [snip]
>> >+
>> >+static inline bool pci_liveupdate_is_incoming(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> >+{
>> >+ return false;
>> >+}
>> > #endif
>> >
>> > #endif /* LINUX_PCI_LIVEUPDATE_H */
>> >--
>> >2.54.0.746.g67dd491aae-goog
>> >
>>
>> Sami
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 20:23 [PATCH v6 00/12] PCI: liveupdate: PCI core support for Live Update David Matlack
2026-05-22 20:23 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] PCI: liveupdate: Set up FLB handler for the PCI core David Matlack
2026-06-05 5:41 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-08 20:51 ` David Matlack
2026-06-09 10:45 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-12 5:15 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-12 6:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-06-12 10:47 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-22 20:24 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] PCI: liveupdate: Track outgoing preserved PCI devices David Matlack
2026-06-05 6:11 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-12 11:38 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-22 20:24 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] PCI: liveupdate: Track incoming " David Matlack
2026-06-06 10:08 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-08 20:57 ` David Matlack
2026-06-09 10:48 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-14 13:38 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-16 20:09 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-06-16 22:20 ` David Matlack
2026-06-16 22:38 ` Samiullah Khawaja [this message]
2026-05-22 20:24 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] PCI: liveupdate: Document driver binding responsibilities David Matlack
2026-05-25 15:35 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-06-06 10:20 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-14 13:41 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-22 20:24 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] PCI: liveupdate: Keep bus numbers constant during Live Update David Matlack
2026-06-06 11:10 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-14 14:01 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-14 13:57 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-22 20:24 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] PCI: liveupdate: Auto-preserve upstream bridges across " David Matlack
2026-06-06 22:15 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-08 21:34 ` David Matlack
2026-06-09 11:15 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-22 20:24 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] PCI: Refactor matching logic for pci_dev_acs_ops David Matlack
2026-06-07 19:01 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-08 21:49 ` David Matlack
2026-06-09 10:56 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-22 20:24 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] PCI: liveupdate: Inherit ACS flags in incoming preserved devices David Matlack
2026-06-07 20:37 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-08 10:49 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-08 18:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-06-09 15:12 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-09 15:34 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-08 21:56 ` David Matlack
2026-06-09 17:20 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-09 18:40 ` David Matlack
2026-06-09 19:25 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-10 0:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-06-10 14:37 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-22 20:24 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] PCI: liveupdate: Inherit ARI Forwarding Enable on preserved bridges David Matlack
2026-06-08 11:33 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-08 18:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-22 20:24 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] PCI: liveupdate: Freeze preservation status during shutdown David Matlack
2026-06-08 11:47 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-22 20:24 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] PCI: liveupdate: Do not disable bus mastering on preserved devices during kexec David Matlack
2026-06-08 11:58 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-22 20:24 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] Documentation: PCI: Add documentation for Live Update David Matlack
2026-06-08 12:01 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajHOd1lkBJTySVif@google.com \
--to=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=ajayachandra@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jrhilke@google.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=witu@nvidia.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox