* Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] sh: remove NUMA and SPARSEMEM support
[not found] ` <eab1aaff6f37089d46401059ad7ff056aa5195c1.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
@ 2026-07-03 6:16 ` Mike Rapoport
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Mike Rapoport @ 2026-07-03 6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Cc: Andrew Morton, Arnd Bergmann, Rich Felker, Yoshinori Sato,
linux-sh, linux-kernel, linux-mm
Hi Adrian,
On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 12:25:47PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> On Thu, 2026-07-02 at 13:20 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > I feel like this is an attempt to force me to give up as a maintainer.
> >
> > This isn't an attempt to force you to give up, this is an attempt to merge
> > patches that have been out there for long time.
>
> You posted these patches the first time in April. This isn't a long time.
It is by mm standards.
> > This isn't about sh, this is about reducing NUMA and SPARSEMEM_STATIC
> > footprint to ease the maintenance.
>
> Yes, and I will eventually pick up those patches to rectify this.
Why do you insist that these patches must go via sh-linux tree?
If you don't have time right now because of other commitments, Andrew is
here to help in exactly these cases: let patches move upstream when a
subsystem maintainer is too overloaded.
> Adrian
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread