From: Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>
To: "Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
axelrasmussen@google.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
chenridong@xiaomi.com, david@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
kasong@tencent.com, lianux.mm@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
lyugaofei@xiaomi.com, mhocko@kernel.org, qi.zheng@linux.dev,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, stevensd@chromium.org,
wangzicheng@honor.com, weixugc@google.com, yuanchu@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/mglru: improve readability of isolate_folios()
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 11:15:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apD9QqyFGRoGxyZA@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820045603.68809-2-baohua@kernel.org>
On 08/20/26 at 12:56pm, Barry Song (Xiaomi) wrote:
> From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
>
> The for_each_evictable_type() loop in isolate_folios()
> is misleading: it does not actually iterate over each
> evictable type. Instead, get_type_to_scan() selects the
> type to scan, while the iterator `i` merely bounds the
> number of attempts.
>
> Make the fallback behavior explicit in the code and remove the
> opaque for_each_evictable_type(i, swappiness).
>
> Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
> Co-developed-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
The subject doens't reflect the truth. This patch changes the behaviour,
but not improve readability of isolate_folios() only.
I also noticed the confusion of isolate_folios() implementation, and made
a patch to only change the local variable and added code comment to
explain it in my local branch. Surely refactorying is also good.
+ * Scan at most one type per evictable type (anon/file), starting with
+ * the type get_type_to_scan() picked as statistically colder.
+ *
+ * After a scan:
+ * - isolated > 0: got folios, record the type and return.
+ * - scanned == 0: the type is empty; fall back to the other type.
+ * - otherwise: the type has folios but all were hot (or lost an
+ * isolate race); retry the same type rather than
+ * switch, so positive_ctrl_err()'s refault
+ * statistics stay unbiased.
+ */
While in Ridong's patch, the 3rd case disappeared. It doesn't rescan with
the original type as the old code is doing, but return directly.
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index c1404a59523d..d5cc30b667ad 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -4833,35 +4833,41 @@ static int get_type_to_scan(struct lruvec *lruvec, int swappiness)
> return positive_ctrl_err(&sp, &pv);
> }
>
> +static inline bool is_single_type_reclaim(int swappiness)
> +{
> + return swappiness == MIN_SWAPPINESS ||
> + swappiness == SWAPPINESS_ANON_ONLY;
> +}
> +
> static int isolate_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
> struct scan_control *sc, int swappiness,
> struct list_head *list, int *isolated,
> int *isolate_type, int *isolate_scanned)
> {
> - int i;
> - int total_scanned = 0;
> + bool type_fallback_allowed = !is_single_type_reclaim(swappiness);
> int type = get_type_to_scan(lruvec, swappiness);
> + int total_scanned = 0, scanned, tier;
>
> - for_each_evictable_type(i, swappiness) {
> - int scanned;
> - int tier = get_tier_idx(lruvec, type);
> +retry:
> + tier = get_tier_idx(lruvec, type);
> + scanned = scan_folios(nr_to_scan, lruvec, sc,
> + type, tier, list, isolated);
>
> - scanned = scan_folios(nr_to_scan, lruvec, sc,
> - type, tier, list, isolated);
> + total_scanned += scanned;
> + if (*isolated) {
> + *isolate_type = type;
> + *isolate_scanned = scanned;
> + return total_scanned;
> + }
>
> - total_scanned += scanned;
> - if (*isolated) {
> - *isolate_type = type;
> - *isolate_scanned = scanned;
> - break;
> - }
> - /*
> - * If scanned > 0 and isolated == 0, avoid falling back to the
> - * other type, as this type remains sufficient. Falling back
> - * too readily can disrupt the positive_ctrl_err() bias.
> - */
> - if (!scanned)
> - type = !type;
> + /*
> + * We are running out of the current reclaim type. Fall back to
> + * the other type if allowed.
> + */
> + if (!scanned && type_fallback_allowed) {
> + type = !type;
> + type_fallback_allowed = false;
> + goto retry;
> }
>
> return total_scanned;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 4:56 [PATCH 0/3] mm/mglru: clean up isolate_folios and scan_folios for readability and clarity Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-20 4:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/mglru: improve readability of isolate_folios() Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-20 9:02 ` Baolin Wang
2026-08-20 9:22 ` Kairui Song
2026-08-28 3:15 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2026-08-28 3:22 ` Barry Song
2026-08-28 5:27 ` Baoquan He
2026-08-20 4:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/mglru: improve scan_folios() exhaustion detection Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-21 1:44 ` Ridong Chen
2026-08-24 6:47 ` Baolin Wang
2026-08-25 21:44 ` Barry Song
2026-08-20 4:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/mglru: retry the same type once if isolation fails due to races Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-21 1:45 ` Ridong Chen
2026-08-24 7:14 ` Baolin Wang
2026-08-20 7:56 ` [PATCH 0/3] mm/mglru: clean up isolate_folios and scan_folios for readability and clarity Lian Wang (ProcessMission)
2026-08-24 7:22 ` Baolin Wang
2026-08-24 11:05 ` Kairui Song
2026-08-25 9:06 ` Baolin Wang
2026-08-25 18:09 ` Kairui Song
2026-08-25 21:11 ` Barry Song
2026-08-27 6:21 ` Baolin Wang
2026-08-27 7:25 ` Kairui Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apD9QqyFGRoGxyZA@fedora \
--to=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=lianux.mm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=lyugaofei@xiaomi.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
--cc=wangzicheng@honor.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox