From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
To: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@redhat.com>
Cc: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
corbet@lwn.net, ziy@nvidia.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, david@kernel.org,
hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, x86@kernel.org,
tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
hughd@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, djbw@kernel.org,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, yintirui@huawei.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
usama.arif@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/14] mips: move has_transparent_hugepage() out of THP guard
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 00:25:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apdQ2FJrLhkdjh_n@alpha.franken.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00eb76eb-c330-4662-9ca9-1e89fbc1e4ce@redhat.com>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 03:53:18PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On 2026-09-01 07:42, Lance Yang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2026/9/1 11:12, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > A future commit will introduce a kernel API to allow for checking if the
> > > CPU supports PMD-sized pages. This API will be based on the
> > > has_transparent_hugepage() implementation but will be orthogonal to THP
> > > and therefore must work when CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=n.
> > >
> > > Move its definition out of the THP guard.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h | 6 +++---
> > > arch/mips/mm/tlb-r4k.c | 4 ----
> > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > index fa7b935f947c..b038da872ec6 100644
> > > --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > @@ -615,9 +615,6 @@ unsigned long io_remap_pfn_range_pfn(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size);
> > > /* We don't have hardware dirty/accessed bits, generic_pmdp_establish is fine.*/
> > > #define pmdp_establish generic_pmdp_establish
> > > -#define has_transparent_hugepage has_transparent_hugepage
> > > -extern int has_transparent_hugepage(void);
> >
> > Assume a decstation_defconfig build. CPU_R3000 selects CPU_R3K_TLB, so the
> > Makefile builds tlb-r3k.o but not tlb-r4k.o IIUC ...
> >
> > The only MIPS definition is in tlb-r4k.c, so R3000 would fail to link with
> > an undefined reference ... no?
>
> Yes, you're right. I can reproduce this. Would the solution below be
> acceptable?
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index fa7b935f947c..b038da872ec6 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -615,9 +615,6 @@ unsigned long io_remap_pfn_range_pfn(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size);
> /* We don't have hardware dirty/accessed bits, generic_pmdp_establish is fine.*/
> #define pmdp_establish generic_pmdp_establish
> -#define has_transparent_hugepage has_transparent_hugepage
> -extern int has_transparent_hugepage(void);
> -
> static inline int pmd_trans_huge(pmd_t pmd)
> {
> return !!(pmd_val(pmd) & _PAGE_HUGE);
> @@ -743,6 +740,9 @@ static inline pmd_t pmdp_huge_get_and_clear(struct mm_struct *mm,
> #endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
> +#define has_transparent_hugepage has_transparent_hugepage
> +extern int has_transparent_hugepage(void);
> +
> #ifdef _PAGE_HUGE
> #define pmd_leaf(pmd) ((pmd_val(pmd) & _PAGE_HUGE) != 0)
> #define pud_leaf(pud) ((pud_val(pud) & _PAGE_HUGE) != 0)
> diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/mips/mm/pgtable.c
> index 10835414819f..3a5b411493d9 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -23,3 +23,30 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pgd_alloc);
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_R4K_CACHE_TLB) || \
> + defined(CONFIG_CPU_SB1) || \
> + defined(CONFIG_CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON)
I guess using CONFIG_CPU_SUPPORTS_HUGEPAGES is a better approach
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 3:12 [PATCH v7 00/14] mm: thp: always enable mTHP support Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-01 3:12 ` [PATCH v7 01/14] docs: tmpfs: remove implementation detail reference Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-01 3:12 ` [PATCH v7 02/14] mm: shmem: shmem_getattr(): set blksize to highest supported THP order Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-01 3:12 ` [PATCH v7 03/14] mm: introduce pgtable_has_pmd_leaves() Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-01 3:12 ` [PATCH v7 04/14] drivers: dax: use pgtable_has_pmd_leaves() Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-01 3:12 ` [PATCH v7 05/14] drivers: nvdimm: " Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-01 3:12 ` [PATCH v7 06/14] mm: debug_vm_pgtable: " Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-01 3:12 ` [PATCH v7 07/14] mm: shmem: allow THP support determination at folio allocation time Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-01 3:12 ` [PATCH v7 08/14] s390: move has_transparent_hugepage() out of THP guard Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-01 3:12 ` [PATCH v7 09/14] powerpc: " Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-01 3:12 ` [PATCH v7 10/14] mips: " Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-01 11:42 ` Lance Yang
2026-09-01 19:53 ` Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-01 22:25 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer [this message]
2026-09-02 15:12 ` Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-01 3:12 ` [PATCH v7 11/14] x86: " Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-01 3:12 ` [PATCH v7 12/14] treewide: introduce arch_has_pmd_leaves() Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-01 3:12 ` [PATCH v7 13/14] mm: replace thp_disabled_by_hw() with pgtable_has_pmd_leaves() Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-01 3:12 ` [PATCH v7 14/14] mm: thp: always enable mTHP support Luiz Capitulino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apdQ2FJrLhkdjh_n@alpha.franken.de \
--to=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luizcap@redhat.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yintirui@huawei.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).