* Re: Sashiko change proposal
2026-10-15 8:38 Sashiko change proposal David Hildenbrand (Arm)
@ 2026-10-15 8:46 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-15 9:28 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-10-15 9:35 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) @ 2026-10-15 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Roman Gushchin, ackerleytng, akpm, chriscli,
hannes, harry, jack, liam, muchun.song, shakeelb, sj, ziy,
Mike Rapoport, Vlastimil Babka, Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 10:38:14AM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> (CCing all people attending the mm-next call)
>
> Hi,
>
> After talking to Roman at MS, he just informed me that sashiko now has a new
> feature combination:
> - "embargo_hours": hours before review is public + emails sent
> - Mechanism for signed-in maintainers to lift embargo immediately
>
> That solves the key issue I had with sashiko: people/agents re-spinning stuff
> too fast before a human at least had the chance to jump in first.
>
> I suggest the following sashiko change for linux-mm:
>
> diff --git a/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml b/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml
> index a9198de..ba123da 100644
> --- a/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml
> +++ b/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml
> @@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ ignored_emails = ["patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org"]
> ["linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"]
> ["linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org"]
> ["linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"]
> -["linux-mm@kvack.org"]
> ["linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org"]
> ["linux-omap@vger.kernel.org"]
> ["linux-pm@vger.kernel.org"]
> @@ -315,3 +314,7 @@ reply_to = ["author", "list", "recipients"]
>
> ["fsverity@lists.linux.dev"]
> reply_to = ["author", "list", "recipients"]
> +
> +["linux-mm@kvack.org"]
> +reply_to = ["author", "list", "recipients"]
> +embargo_hours = 24
>
>
> Which means:
> - Embargo 24h
> - Mails sent to everybody (author, list, CC list)
> - No positive-review ("looks great") mails (default)
> - No other static email addresses that receive a copy (default)
> - No additional ignored author email addresses (default)
>
> I'd say we start with 24h and see how it goes.
>
> Thoughts?
Yes, no notes :)
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
--
Cheers, Lorenzo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Sashiko change proposal
2026-10-15 8:38 Sashiko change proposal David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-10-15 8:46 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
@ 2026-10-15 9:28 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-10-15 9:35 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Rapoport @ 2026-10-15 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Roman Gushchin, ackerleytng, akpm, chriscli,
hannes, harry, jack, liam, muchun.song, shakeelb, sj, ziy,
Lorenzo Stoakes (Arm), Vlastimil Babka, Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 10:38:14AM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> (CCing all people attending the mm-next call)
>
> Hi,
>
> After talking to Roman at MS, he just informed me that sashiko now has a new
> feature combination:
> - "embargo_hours": hours before review is public + emails sent
> - Mechanism for signed-in maintainers to lift embargo immediately
>
> That solves the key issue I had with sashiko: people/agents re-spinning stuff
> too fast before a human at least had the chance to jump in first.
>
> I suggest the following sashiko change for linux-mm:
>
> diff --git a/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml b/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml
> index a9198de..ba123da 100644
> --- a/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml
> +++ b/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml
> @@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ ignored_emails = ["patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org"]
> ["linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"]
> ["linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org"]
> ["linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"]
> -["linux-mm@kvack.org"]
> ["linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org"]
> ["linux-omap@vger.kernel.org"]
> ["linux-pm@vger.kernel.org"]
> @@ -315,3 +314,7 @@ reply_to = ["author", "list", "recipients"]
>
> ["fsverity@lists.linux.dev"]
> reply_to = ["author", "list", "recipients"]
> +
> +["linux-mm@kvack.org"]
> +reply_to = ["author", "list", "recipients"]
> +embargo_hours = 24
>
>
> Which means:
> - Embargo 24h
> - Mails sent to everybody (author, list, CC list)
> - No positive-review ("looks great") mails (default)
> - No other static email addresses that receive a copy (default)
> - No additional ignored author email addresses (default)
>
> I'd say we start with 24h and see how it goes.
Sounds good!
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Sashiko change proposal
2026-10-15 8:38 Sashiko change proposal David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-10-15 8:46 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-15 9:28 ` Mike Rapoport
@ 2026-10-15 9:35 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) @ 2026-10-15 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand (Arm), linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Roman Gushchin, ackerleytng, akpm, chriscli, hannes, harry, jack,
liam, muchun.song, shakeelb, sj, ziy, Lorenzo Stoakes (Arm),
Mike Rapoport, Matthew Wilcox
On 10/15/26 10:38, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> (CCing all people attending the mm-next call)
>
> Hi,
>
> After talking to Roman at MS, he just informed me that sashiko now has a new
> feature combination:
> - "embargo_hours": hours before review is public + emails sent
> - Mechanism for signed-in maintainers to lift embargo immediately
>
> That solves the key issue I had with sashiko: people/agents re-spinning stuff
> too fast before a human at least had the chance to jump in first.
>
> I suggest the following sashiko change for linux-mm:
>
> diff --git a/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml b/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml
> index a9198de..ba123da 100644
> --- a/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml
> +++ b/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml
> @@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ ignored_emails = ["patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org"]
> ["linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"]
> ["linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org"]
> ["linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"]
> -["linux-mm@kvack.org"]
> ["linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org"]
> ["linux-omap@vger.kernel.org"]
> ["linux-pm@vger.kernel.org"]
> @@ -315,3 +314,7 @@ reply_to = ["author", "list", "recipients"]
>
> ["fsverity@lists.linux.dev"]
> reply_to = ["author", "list", "recipients"]
> +
> +["linux-mm@kvack.org"]
> +reply_to = ["author", "list", "recipients"]
> +embargo_hours = 24
>
>
> Which means:
> - Embargo 24h
> - Mails sent to everybody (author, list, CC list)
> - No positive-review ("looks great") mails (default)
> - No other static email addresses that receive a copy (default)
> - No additional ignored author email addresses (default)
>
> I'd say we start with 24h and see how it goes.
>
> Thoughts?
LGTM!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread