Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 "Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
	 Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mm/mremap: report a failed split before moving anything
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 12:50:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <auiGqsbwuRhIfhvj@gremlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261030-b4-mremap-pre-split-v1-0-c1829811aed0@toxicpanda.com>

On Fri, Oct 30, 2026 at 02:42:45PM +0000, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I went through the callers of __split_vma() to see who can't cope with
> it failing, and mremap() is the bad one.  If you move part of a VMA we

Yeah, what's frustrating there is that, AFAICT, the only really relevant
case is DAX.

But maybe hugetlb somehow raises its ugly head as you allude to.

> don't split it until the very end, when we unmap the old range.  By then
> the page tables have moved and there's nothing to go back to, so we fix
> up the accounting and return success with the old range still mapped.
>
> Lorenzo recently added a way to split ahead of the move for the mlock()
> + MREMAP_DONTUNMAP case.  This series uses that for every move that

MREMAP_DONTUNMAP is another real horror show for bugs. Candidate for
'should have never been merged'...

> unmaps its source, so a split that fails is reported before we've done
> anything.
>
> Doing that turned up a real bug in hugetlb.  We take the reservation map
> away from the whole old VMA before the part that's moving is split off,
> so the parts that stay never give their reservations back.  That fix is
> the first patch so it can go to stable by itself, and the second patch
> is a selftest for it.
>
> The next two fix the accounting for when the unmap at the end does fail,
> we either charged memory that was never accounted or lost track of the
> charge for the whole VMA.  That gets a lot harder to hit with the last
> patch but it's still possible.  There's also a test for an old size of
> 0, which nothing covered.

I feel like the charging logic needs to be reworked anyway. This whole
'drop VMA_ACCOUNT_BIT' hack is extremely stupid.

>
> I tested this with the mm selftests and with a loop that fails each
> allocation inside mremap() in turn and checks that we either moved or
> didn't.  The numbers for moving part of a mapping don't change.  Thanks,
>
> Josef

Anyway, thanks for these, will go through.

>
> ---
> Josef Bacik (6):
>       mm/mremap: fix hugetlb reservation leak on partial move
>       selftests/mm: test a partial mremap() of hugetlb memory
>       mm/mremap: reaccount on unmap failure only if accounted
>       mm/mremap: restore VM_ACCOUNT if the unmap fails
>       selftests/mm: test mremap() with an old size of 0
>       mm/mremap: split first so a failed split is reported
>
>  mm/mremap.c                                 | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb-mremap.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c    | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: cd1d0b147afa81f80927f9711e53401703964217
> change-id: 20261030-b4-mremap-pre-split-13a3d54d6dbd
>

--
Cheers, Lorenzo


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-02 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-30 14:42 [PATCH 0/6] mm/mremap: report a failed split before moving anything Josef Bacik
2026-10-30 14:42 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/mremap: fix hugetlb reservation leak on partial move Josef Bacik
2026-11-02 13:13   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-30 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/6] selftests/mm: test a partial mremap() of hugetlb memory Josef Bacik
2026-11-02 13:14   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-30 14:42 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm/mremap: reaccount on unmap failure only if accounted Josef Bacik
2026-11-02 13:17   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-30 14:42 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/mremap: restore VM_ACCOUNT if the unmap fails Josef Bacik
2026-11-02 13:38   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-30 14:42 ` [PATCH 5/6] selftests/mm: test mremap() with an old size of 0 Josef Bacik
2026-11-02 13:39   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-30 14:42 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm/mremap: split first so a failed split is reported Josef Bacik
2026-10-31 19:27   ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-02 13:57   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-02 12:50 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=auiGqsbwuRhIfhvj@gremlin \
    --to=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox