From: Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
To: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] mm, slab: refactor slab_min/max_order handling
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 13:12:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aux_UhaXFYy0ZXhm@thinkstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105-slub_tiny_rework-v3-3-0484ce59eabb@kernel.org>
On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 09:43:52AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
> Setting slab_min_order and slab_max_order as boot-time parameters
> currently has several not so great aspects:
>
> - slab_min_order is not checked against MAX_PAGE_ORDER
> - slab_min_order can raise slab_max_order
> - processing requires custom callbacks, their execution order
> depends on the order of boot time parameters specified
> - upcoming SLUB_TINY changes would be more complicated
>
> Instead of custom callbacks, introduce __initdata variables that hold
> the boot-time parameter values (if given). All inputs are then evaluated
> deterministically in kmem_cache_init(). slab_min_order is always capped
> at slab_max_order and cannot raise it.
>
> debug_guardpage_minorder() still overrides any given boot time params,
> but it could be changed if there's a use case.
>
> While at it, rename the slub_min/max_order variables and
> slub_min_objects to have a "slab_" prefix instead, as their values
> determine the sizing of slabs, and the "slub_" prefix already became
> deprecated also for the boot-time parameters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> ---
Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo (Meta) <harry@kernel.org>
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 8:43 [PATCH v3 00/10] replace CONFIG_SLUB_TINY with a slab_tiny boot parameter Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] slab, kunit: pin test slabs by an extra allocation Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 12:59 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] kasan, " Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 13:03 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 13:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] mm, slab: refactor slab_min/max_order handling Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 13:12 ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] mm, slab: introduce slab_debug=N Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 13:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 14:30 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 14:36 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 15:02 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] mm, slab: rework KMALLOC_RECLAIM handling of SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] mm, slab: make SLUB_TINY handling dynamic for sizing decisions Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] mm, slab: convert CONFIG_SLUB_TINY checks to kmem_cache_debug() Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] mm, slab: remove remaining compile-time checks for CONFIG_SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] mm, slab: add slab_tiny boot param Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] mm, slab: deprecate CONFIG_SLUB_TINY and reduce its Kconfig effects Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aux_UhaXFYy0ZXhm@thinkstation \
--to=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox