From: Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
To: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] mm, slab: introduce slab_debug=N
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 15:02:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auyVRU5abrWHVfgM@thinkstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ac409a1-fe3e-4b37-8130-4d49ecb6106a@kernel.org>
On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 03:36:25PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
> On 11/5/26 15:30, Harry Yoo wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 09:43:53AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
> >> Enabling slab_debug has the side-effect of disabling all percpu caching
> >> of objects (now via sheaves), which can be sometimes useful for saving
> >> memory for e.g. kdump kernels. To make this possible without the
> >> overhead (CPU or memory) of actual debugging options such as poisoning,
> >> introduce a No-op debug option that only forces the debugging slow paths
> >> and zero sheaf capacity. The new corresponding slab flag is
> >> SLAB_DEBUG_NOOP.
> >>
> >> This will also allow reimplementing CONFIG_SLUB_TINY as a boot-time
> >> option.
> >>
> >> Two details have to be considered, as suggested by Harry Yoo [1].
> >>
> >> - While SLAB_DEBUG_NOOP is part of SLAB_DEBUG_FLAGS, it should not
> >> prevent cache merging as it doesn't affect object metadata, and lack
> >> of merging would go against the memory footprint reduction. Thus
> >> exclude the flag from SLAB_NEVER_MERGE.
> >>
> >> - However add the flag to SLAB_MERGE_SAME, per sashiko.
> >>
> >> - SLAB_DEBUG_NOOP alone should not request disabling printk pointer
> >> hashing. Thus rework the call to hash_pointers_finalize() to not rely
> >> on the slub_debug static key state. Instead determine whether the
> >> global or per-cache slab_debug options include any flags that are not
> >> SLAB_DEBUG_NOOP. This does not change the fact that caches created
> >> with explicit debug flags (i.e. slub_kunit tests) later in boot have
> >> no effect on pointer hashing, which is determined in
> >> kmem_cache_init().
> >>
> >> While documenting the new N option, remove obsolete SLAB references from
> >> the F option description.
> >>
> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/arUx56ee_nkxYP_f@thinkstation/
> >> [2] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261024-slub_tiny_rework-v2-0-bf1419ab5ffd@kernel.org?part=2
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> >> ---
> >
> > With the sashiko report to this patch fixed, this looks good to me.
> > Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo (Meta) <harry@kernel.org>
> >
> > One nit comment:
> >
> > specifying SLAB_DEBUG_FLAGS depends on CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG, and with this
> > patchset there is no way to minimize slab memory usage w/o SLUB_DEBUG.
>
> Maybe not at this point, but unless I made some mistake, later slab_tiny=1
> stops depending on SLUB_DEBUG.
Ah, I see. Right.
> slab_debug=N itself does depend on it but I
> think that's acceptable
Yeah.
> > Sounds like it's time to make SLUB_DEBUG unconditional. It's enabled on
> > all distros listed in kconfigs [1].
>
> Yes it's my plan to do that next, I did even discuss it with Christoph at LPC :)
Sounds good!
> > I built kernels w/o SLUB_DEBUG and the difference in the kernel
> > binary was about 40 KiB.
> >
> > [1] https://oracle.github.io/kconfigs/?config=UTS_RELEASE&config=SLUB_DEBUG
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 8:43 [PATCH v3 00/10] replace CONFIG_SLUB_TINY with a slab_tiny boot parameter Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] slab, kunit: pin test slabs by an extra allocation Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 12:59 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] kasan, " Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 13:03 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 13:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] mm, slab: refactor slab_min/max_order handling Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 13:12 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] mm, slab: introduce slab_debug=N Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 13:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 14:30 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 14:36 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 15:02 ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] mm, slab: rework KMALLOC_RECLAIM handling of SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] mm, slab: make SLUB_TINY handling dynamic for sizing decisions Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] mm, slab: convert CONFIG_SLUB_TINY checks to kmem_cache_debug() Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] mm, slab: remove remaining compile-time checks for CONFIG_SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] mm, slab: add slab_tiny boot param Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] mm, slab: deprecate CONFIG_SLUB_TINY and reduce its Kconfig effects Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auyVRU5abrWHVfgM@thinkstation \
--to=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox