* [PATCH v4] mm/migrate_device: Clear stale mapping after freeing swapcache
@ 2026-07-28 6:28 Arvind Yadav
2026-07-28 9:51 ` Balbir Singh
2026-07-28 12:50 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Arvind Yadav @ 2026-07-28 6:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
Cc: akpm, david, matthew.brost, joshua.hahnjy, ziy, rakie.kim,
byungchul, gourry, ying.huang, apopple, balbirs
__migrate_device_pages() reads the folio mapping before calling
folio_free_swap(). When folio_free_swap() succeeds, the folio is removed
from the swap cache, but the saved mapping still points to swap_space.
Passing the stale mapping to folio_migrate_mapping() makes it use the
mapped-folio path for a folio that is no longer in swapcache. It can
then operate on swap_space.i_pages with invalid reference accounting,
eventually triggering a folio reference count BUG.
After a successful split, nr still contains the number of pages in the
original large folio, although each resulting page is now a separate
order-0 folio. Reset nr to 1 so each split folio is processed separately,
including its own swapcache removal and mapping lookup.
Refresh the saved mapping after folio_free_swap() so the current folio
state is used during migration.
v2:
- Refresh the mapping using folio_mapping(), as suggested by Zi Yan.
v3:
- Reset nr to 1 after a successful split so each resulting folio is
processed independently, as suggested by Zi Yan.
v4:
- Re-read each source folio's mapping immediately before
folio_migrate_mapping(), as suggested by Balbir Singh.
- Add a warning to validate the post-split order-0 invariant,
as suggested by Balbir Singh.
Fixes: df263d9a7dff ("mm/migrate_device: try to handle swapcache pages")
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
Cc: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
Cc: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
Cc: Ying Huang <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
---
mm/migrate_device.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/migrate_device.c b/mm/migrate_device.c
index 554754eb26ff..0e6f00190fd8 100644
--- a/mm/migrate_device.c
+++ b/mm/migrate_device.c
@@ -1182,6 +1182,13 @@ static void __migrate_device_pages(unsigned long *src_pfns,
MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND);
goto next;
}
+
+ /*
+ * reset nr so that only first after-split folio
+ * is processed below
+ */
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_large(folio));
+ nr = 1;
} else if ((src_pfns[i] & MIGRATE_PFN_MIGRATE) &&
(dst_pfns[i] & MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND) &&
!(src_pfns[i] & MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND)) {
@@ -1221,6 +1228,12 @@ static void __migrate_device_pages(unsigned long *src_pfns,
folio = page_folio(migrate_pfn_to_page(src_pfns[i+j]));
newfolio = page_folio(migrate_pfn_to_page(dst_pfns[i+j]));
+ /*
+ * folio_free_swap() removed the folio from the swap
+ * cache. Refresh the saved mapping before migration.
+ */
+ mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
+
r = folio_migrate_mapping(mapping, newfolio, folio, extra_cnt);
if (r)
src_pfns[i+j] &= ~MIGRATE_PFN_MIGRATE;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4] mm/migrate_device: Clear stale mapping after freeing swapcache
2026-07-28 6:28 [PATCH v4] mm/migrate_device: Clear stale mapping after freeing swapcache Arvind Yadav
@ 2026-07-28 9:51 ` Balbir Singh
2026-07-28 12:50 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Balbir Singh @ 2026-07-28 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arvind Yadav, linux-mm, linux-kernel
Cc: akpm, david, matthew.brost, joshua.hahnjy, ziy, rakie.kim,
byungchul, gourry, ying.huang, apopple
On 7/28/26 4:28 PM, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> __migrate_device_pages() reads the folio mapping before calling
> folio_free_swap(). When folio_free_swap() succeeds, the folio is removed
> from the swap cache, but the saved mapping still points to swap_space.
>
> Passing the stale mapping to folio_migrate_mapping() makes it use the
> mapped-folio path for a folio that is no longer in swapcache. It can
> then operate on swap_space.i_pages with invalid reference accounting,
> eventually triggering a folio reference count BUG.
>
> After a successful split, nr still contains the number of pages in the
> original large folio, although each resulting page is now a separate
> order-0 folio. Reset nr to 1 so each split folio is processed separately,
> including its own swapcache removal and mapping lookup.
>
> Refresh the saved mapping after folio_free_swap() so the current folio
> state is used during migration.
>
> v2:
> - Refresh the mapping using folio_mapping(), as suggested by Zi Yan.
>
> v3:
> - Reset nr to 1 after a successful split so each resulting folio is
> processed independently, as suggested by Zi Yan.
>
> v4:
> - Re-read each source folio's mapping immediately before
> folio_migrate_mapping(), as suggested by Balbir Singh.
> - Add a warning to validate the post-split order-0 invariant,
> as suggested by Balbir Singh.
>
> Fixes: df263d9a7dff ("mm/migrate_device: try to handle swapcache pages")
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
> Cc: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>
> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
> Cc: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
> Cc: Ying Huang <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
> ---
> mm/migrate_device.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4] mm/migrate_device: Clear stale mapping after freeing swapcache
2026-07-28 6:28 [PATCH v4] mm/migrate_device: Clear stale mapping after freeing swapcache Arvind Yadav
2026-07-28 9:51 ` Balbir Singh
@ 2026-07-28 12:50 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand (Arm) @ 2026-07-28 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arvind Yadav, linux-mm, linux-kernel
Cc: akpm, matthew.brost, joshua.hahnjy, ziy, rakie.kim, byungchul,
gourry, ying.huang, apopple, balbirs
On 7/28/26 08:28, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> __migrate_device_pages() reads the folio mapping before calling
> folio_free_swap(). When folio_free_swap() succeeds, the folio is removed
> from the swap cache, but the saved mapping still points to swap_space.
>
> Passing the stale mapping to folio_migrate_mapping() makes it use the
> mapped-folio path for a folio that is no longer in swapcache. It can
> then operate on swap_space.i_pages with invalid reference accounting,
> eventually triggering a folio reference count BUG.
>
> After a successful split, nr still contains the number of pages in the
> original large folio, although each resulting page is now a separate
> order-0 folio. Reset nr to 1 so each split folio is processed separately,
> including its own swapcache removal and mapping lookup.
>
> Refresh the saved mapping after folio_free_swap() so the current folio
> state is used during migration.
>
> v2:
> - Refresh the mapping using folio_mapping(), as suggested by Zi Yan.
>
> v3:
> - Reset nr to 1 after a successful split so each resulting folio is
> processed independently, as suggested by Zi Yan.
>
> v4:
> - Re-read each source folio's mapping immediately before
> folio_migrate_mapping(), as suggested by Balbir Singh.
> - Add a warning to validate the post-split order-0 invariant,
> as suggested by Balbir Singh.
>
> Fixes: df263d9a7dff ("mm/migrate_device: try to handle swapcache pages")
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
> Cc: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>
> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
> Cc: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
> Cc: Ying Huang <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
> ---
> mm/migrate_device.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/migrate_device.c b/mm/migrate_device.c
> index 554754eb26ff..0e6f00190fd8 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate_device.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate_device.c
> @@ -1182,6 +1182,13 @@ static void __migrate_device_pages(unsigned long *src_pfns,
> MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND);
> goto next;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * reset nr so that only first after-split folio
> + * is processed below
> + */
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_large(folio));
> + nr = 1;
This function is surely a beauty. (had to rephrase that sentence 3 times ;) )
migrate_vma_split_unmapped_folio() modifies the src_pfns() entries on success.
(and somehow assumes that it's always a THP, what? After a MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND
value is set? What? Why the "nr = 1 << folio_order(folio);" in the caller).
If we ended up modifying the current entry in such a way, shouldn't we just have
retry: label and restart at the very top of the function, where we just
naturally re-read the entry/page/folio and do the right thing?
> } else if ((src_pfns[i] & MIGRATE_PFN_MIGRATE) &&
> (dst_pfns[i] & MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND) &&
> !(src_pfns[i] & MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND)) {
> @@ -1221,6 +1228,12 @@ static void __migrate_device_pages(unsigned long *src_pfns,
> folio = page_folio(migrate_pfn_to_page(src_pfns[i+j]));
> newfolio = page_folio(migrate_pfn_to_page(dst_pfns[i+j]));
>
> + /*
> + * folio_free_swap() removed the folio from the swap
> + * cache. Refresh the saved mapping before migration.
> + */
> + mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
> +
> r = folio_migrate_mapping(mapping, newfolio, folio, extra_cnt);
> if (r)
> src_pfns[i+j] &= ~MIGRATE_PFN_MIGRATE;
While this looks good, I do wonder why do we have to supply the mapping here at all?
Is there a path where we call folio_migrate_mapping() and the old folio (folio)
does no longer have the right mapping attached?
It would be a lot less error prone if the function would just obtain the mapping
from the old folio.
--
Cheers,
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-28 12:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-28 6:28 [PATCH v4] mm/migrate_device: Clear stale mapping after freeing swapcache Arvind Yadav
2026-07-28 9:51 ` Balbir Singh
2026-07-28 12:50 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox