Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/rmap: Add try_to_unmap_hugetlb_one

["David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>]

On 7/10/26 15:16, Dev Jain wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/07/26 11:29 am, Dev Jain wrote:
>> Simplify try_to_unmap_one() by separating the hugetlb parts into
>> try_to_unmap_hugetlb_one().
>>
>> To understand the correctness of the refactoring, the following points
>> are noted:
>>
>> 1. try_to_unmap() is called for hugetlb folios only when they are
>>    hwpoisoned.
>>
>> 2. A hugetlb VMA cannot be mlocked.
>>
>> 3. page_vma_mapped_walk() returns at most one hugetlb mapping in a VMA,
>>    and that mapping points at the head PFN.
>>
>> 4. We won't ever process a softleaf entry that encodes a hugetlb folio;
>>    hugetlb folios are never swapped out, migration entries will be
>>    skipped (PVMW_MIGRATION not passed), and device-exclusive does not
>>    work for hugetlb.
>>
>> 5. The hwpoison entry is constructed from the poisoned folio, just as in
>>    the pre-refactor code. Any previous uffd-wp state is deliberately not
>>    preserved for the hwpoison entry.
>>
>> 6. TTU_HWPOISON is always present; for it to not be present, either the
>>    folio has to be in swapcache, or mapping_can_writeback() is true (see
>>    unmap_poisoned_folio), none of which is true for hugetlb folios.
>>
>> 7. Hugetlb uses separate counters from normal rss counters, therefore
>>    update_highwater_rss() need not be called.
>>
>> While at it:
>>
>>  - Change VM_BUG_* to VM_WARN_*.
>>
>>  - Do not declare variables which are only used once.
>>
>>  - Constify some variables.
>>
>>  - Add some more VM_WARN_* to assert some invariants.
>>
>> Except the above 4 points, no functional change intended.
>>
>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
>> ---
> 
> Andrew, could you squash the following diff:
> 
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index cf02b315a2ead..b61051b879c4c 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -2229,8 +2229,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>                 update_hiwater_rss(mm);
> 
>                 /*
> -                * With TTU_HWPOISON, we only expect small folios or hugetlb
> -                * folios here for now.
> +                * With TTU_HWPOISON, we only expect small folios here.
>                  */
>                 if (folio_test_hwpoison(folio) && (flags & TTU_HWPOISON)) {
>                         pteval = swp_entry_to_pte(make_hwpoison_entry(subpage));

Note that the comment likely fits into a single line now.

-- 
Cheers,

David