From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ljs@kernel.org, chrisl@kernel.org,
kasong@tencent.com, hughd@google.com, liam@infradead.org
Cc: riel@surriel.com, vbabka@kernel.org, harry@kernel.org,
jannh@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, qi.zheng@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
baohua@kernel.org, axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com,
weixugc@google.com, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, nphamcs@gmail.com,
bhe@redhat.com, youngjun.park@lge.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, pfalcato@suse.de,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] mm/rmap: convert page -> folio for hwpoison checks
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 15:44:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f487d61c-844d-46b6-8522-375549d49346@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526063635.61721-2-dev.jain@arm.com>
On 5/26/26 08:36, Dev Jain wrote:
> If any page of a folio is poisoned, try_to_unmap() is called with the
> intent to remove any mappings pointing to any part of the folio.
>
> Therefore, an hwpoison check on a single page does not make sense
> (although everything works out because the memory-failure path sets
> hwpoison on the head page too). Convert these checks to check whether
> the folio has at least one hwpoisoned page.
I think the reasoning is different and should better be described:
1) For hugetlb, we will always get subpage == head page (single PTE -> first PFN).
try_memory_failure_hugetlb()->try_memory_failure_hugetlb()->hugetlb_update_hwpoison()
will do the folio_test_set_hwpoison().
folio_test_set_hwpoison() is the same as setting it on the head page.
For hugetlb, subpage==headpage
That's why PageHWPoison(subpage) used to work.
2) try_to_unmap() cannot handle large folios (besides hugetlb folios).
unmap_poisoned_folio() spells that out. That's why subpage==headpage right now.
That's why PageHWPoison(subpage) used to work.
>
> While at it, convert VM_BUG_* to VM_WARN_*.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> ---
> mm/rmap.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index fb3c351f8c458..430c91c8fe2ae 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -2116,10 +2116,11 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> bool anon = folio_test_anon(folio);
>
> /*
> - * The try_to_unmap() is only passed a hugetlb page
> - * in the case where the hugetlb page is poisoned.
> + * The try_to_unmap() is only passed a hugetlb folio
> + * in the case where the hugetlb folio contains a
> + * poisoned page.
> */
> - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHWPoison(subpage), subpage);
> + VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_contain_hwpoisoned_page(folio), folio);
I think we could also just use folio_test_hwpoison() here.
> /*
> * huge_pmd_unshare may unmap an entire PMD page.
> * There is no way of knowing exactly which PMDs may
> @@ -2198,7 +2199,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> /* Update high watermark before we lower rss */
> update_hiwater_rss(mm);
>
> - if (PageHWPoison(subpage) && (flags & TTU_HWPOISON)) {
> + if (folio_contain_hwpoisoned_page(folio) && (flags & TTU_HWPOISON)) {
> pteval = swp_entry_to_pte(make_hwpoison_entry(subpage));
> if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
> hugetlb_count_sub(folio_nr_pages(folio), mm);
And here. Which might be cleaner, because folio_contain_hwpoisoned_page() is so
far never called on hugetlb folios.
Because folio_set_has_hwpoisoned() is only ever used on THPs, not hugetlb. It
would currently work, but the expectation so far is that these primitives are
for small folios+thp, not hugetlb.
You could add a comment here, that with TTU_HWPOISON, we only ever expect small
folios or hugetlb folios for now.
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 6:36 [PATCH v4 00/12] Optimize anonymous large folio unmapping Dev Jain
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] mm/rmap: convert page -> folio for hwpoison checks Dev Jain
2026-06-09 13:44 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-06-10 7:02 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-10 12:13 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] mm/rmap: Add try_to_unmap_hugetlb_one Dev Jain
2026-06-09 14:16 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] mm/rmap: refactor some code around lazyfree folio unmapping Dev Jain
2026-06-09 14:20 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] mm/memory: Batch set uffd-wp markers during zapping Dev Jain
2026-06-16 13:43 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] mm/rmap: batch unmap folios belonging to uffd-wp VMAs Dev Jain
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] mm/swap: rename subpage->page in folio_dup_swap/folio_put_swap Dev Jain
2026-06-16 13:47 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] mm/swapfile: Add batched version of folio_dup_swap Dev Jain
2026-06-16 13:50 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-16 13:51 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] mm/swapfile: Add batched version of folio_put_swap Dev Jain
2026-06-16 13:54 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] mm/rmap: Add batched version of folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte Dev Jain
2026-06-16 14:04 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] mm/rmap: refactor anon folio unmap in try_to_unmap_one Dev Jain
2026-06-16 14:10 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] mm/mprotect: drop 'sub' from page_anon_exclusive_sub_batch Dev Jain
2026-06-16 14:12 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] mm/rmap: enable batch unmapping of anonymous folios Dev Jain
2026-05-28 16:50 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] Optimize anonymous large folio unmapping Dev Jain
2026-06-09 13:24 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-09 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f487d61c-844d-46b6-8522-375549d49346@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=youngjun.park@lge.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox