Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	"David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/8] mm/gup: split follow_page_pte_commit() out of follow_page_pte()
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2026 09:20:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f86ca125a9b63cdab8edeb3c3b02a29141f18c1a.camel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe9f0bb5-73e3-4509-951d-e529e37011fd@nvidia.com>

On Fri, 2026-08-21 at 15:04 -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> 
> You have delved too deep, and now uncovered something that's been
> a problem for the whole time. :)
> 
> Specifically, "no, GUP should not be setting folios nor pages
> dirty", because that generally needs to be done as part of a
> filesystem
> coordinated set of steps. If the page is dirty, and the filesystem
> didn't expect it to be, that leads to problems.
> 
> This is part of the big, remaining set of required fixes, that
> launched the creation of pin_user_pages*() and related. Connecting
> up the filesystems properly is yet to be done. And until then, this
> is a real defect.
> 
Not just filesystems.

I found about two dozen places where drivers
fail to mark a page dirty after writing to
it, after obtaining the page from GUP.

I'll get out patches for that, unless there's
some reason I shouldn't.

-- 
All Rights Reversed.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-22 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-11  2:51 [RFC PATCH v3 0/8] batch lookups in follow_page_mask() Rik van Riel
2026-08-11  2:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/8] mm/gup: break out gup_fill_pages() helper Rik van Riel
2026-08-11  2:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/8] mm/gup: convert follow_page_mask() to return a long Rik van Riel
2026-08-11  2:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/8] mm/gup: split follow_page_pte_commit() out of follow_page_pte() Rik van Riel
2026-08-12 11:50   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-12 13:02     ` Rik van Riel
2026-08-12 13:23       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-12 16:19         ` Rik van Riel
2026-08-21 17:38         ` Rik van Riel
2026-08-21 22:04           ` John Hubbard
2026-08-22 13:20             ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2026-08-22 21:31               ` John Hubbard
2026-08-24 13:20                 ` Rik van Riel
2026-08-11  2:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/8] mm/gup: break out follow_one_pte() helper Rik van Riel
2026-08-11  2:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/8] mm/gup: fill the pages array outside the pud/pmd lock Rik van Riel
2026-08-11  2:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/8] mm/gup: return a huge page's full count from follow_page_mask() Rik van Riel
2026-08-11  2:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 7/8] mm/gup: walk multiple PTEs per follow_page_pte() call Rik van Riel
2026-08-11  2:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 8/8] mm/gup: batch contiguous same-folio PTEs into one refcount grab Rik van Riel
2026-08-12 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/8] batch lookups in follow_page_mask() David Hildenbrand (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f86ca125a9b63cdab8edeb3c3b02a29141f18c1a.camel@surriel.com \
    --to=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox