From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFT] mmc: tmio: reset device on timeout, too
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:37:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200909113745.GK2272@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFr24YxoJ3m5r1C_4-UAdtJQp_MK0+wwZjsQXzrs5dxLjw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1465 bytes --]
Hi Ulf,
> > Hmm, there are some wireless drivers using it as well. I am confused, is
> > this considered "upper layer"?
> >
> > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c: ret = mmc_hw_reset(ar_sdio->func->card->host);
> > drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c: mmc_hw_reset(sdiodev->func1->card->host);
> > drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c: ret = mmc_hw_reset(func->card->host);
> > drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c: mmc_hw_reset(card->host);
>
> Correct, these are "upper layers". The same applies for the mmc block
> device driver.
>
> In this way there is a guarantee that the struct mmc_card is still present.
Ah, now I get it. "upper layers" as in consumers. And because consumers
sit on a card, this guarantees that mmc_card is still there. Correct?
> That would be great. I appreciate all kinds of improvements on the doc parts.
You are welcome!
> Perhaps a better option is to return a specific error code for the
> last request, that makes the core run mmc_hw_reset(). Or potentially,
> add a host cap and let the core treat some error code, specifically
> for hosts like tmio.
A specific errno could work. I don't see the advantage of a CAP (besides
it is rather a quirk than a cap). We could also have
'mmc_controller_card_reset()' or something which ensures mmc_card is
present and let that controllers call when they see fit. Or?
Thanks for your help,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-09 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-21 8:16 [RFT] mmc: tmio: reset device on timeout, too Wolfram Sang
2020-08-28 12:18 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-08-28 12:35 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-08-30 13:03 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-09-09 11:24 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-09-09 11:37 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2020-09-09 12:45 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-09-15 10:05 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200909113745.GK2272@ninjato \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox