Linux MultiMedia Card development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erick Shepherd <erick.shepherd@ni.com>
To: <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: <brad.mouring@ni.com>, <erick.shepherd@ni.com>,
	<gratian.crisan@emerson.com>, <kyle.roeschley@ni.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mmc: core: Wait for Vdd to settle on card power off
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 11:46:43 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250307174643.1288695-1-erick.shepherd@ni.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35aebb39-ae2e-4186-8de4-6830ec661f4d@intel.com>

>> The SD spec version 6.0 section 6.4.1.5 requires that Vdd must be
>> lowered to less than 0.5V for a minimum of 1 ms when powering off a
>> card. Increase our wait to 15 ms so that voltage has time to drain down
>> to 0.5V.

> mmc_power_off() has a delay.  So does mmc_power_cycle()

> Why does this need to be in sdhci?  Are you experiencing an
> issue?

Thank you for taking a look at this. The initial change was made in
mmc_power_off() due to an issue we had with some of our devices
requiring more time for the Vdd to drain below 0.5V. Ulf gave us this
feedback on that change:

> No, this isn't the proper place of adding more "magic" delays.

> Instead, make sure the related ->set_ios() callback in the mmc host
> driver deals with this instead. In case it uses an external regulator,
> via the regulator API, then this is something that should be
> controlled with the definition of the regulator.

Should we take a different approach here? 

Regards
Erick

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-07 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-11 21:46 [PATCH] mmc: core: Wait for Vdd to settle on card power off Erick Shepherd
2025-02-13 10:22 ` Avri Altman
2025-03-05 18:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2025-03-07 17:46   ` Erick Shepherd [this message]
2025-03-07 18:53     ` Adrian Hunter
2025-03-07 21:16       ` Erick Shepherd
2025-03-12 12:44         ` Adrian Hunter
2025-03-13  3:35           ` Erick Shepherd
2025-03-13  8:20             ` Adrian Hunter
2025-03-13 20:44               ` Erick Shepherd
2025-03-14  5:56                 ` Adrian Hunter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-09-21 17:47 Kyle Roeschley
2017-09-22  9:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-09-22 13:57   ` Kyle Roeschley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250307174643.1288695-1-erick.shepherd@ni.com \
    --to=erick.shepherd@ni.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=brad.mouring@ni.com \
    --cc=gratian.crisan@emerson.com \
    --cc=kyle.roeschley@ni.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox