Linux MultiMedia Card development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Write ITAPDLY for DDR52 timing
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 09:40:33 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <34864935-2cf0-4a9f-aa52-bc6dd89da26b@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00d4a5fe-2a9d-41c6-8f40-df657fd277d8@intel.com>

Hi Adrian,

On 2/28/24 7:21 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 20/02/24 23:05, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> Hi Adrian,
>>
>> On 2/16/24 11:09 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> On 7/02/24 03:15, Judith Mendez wrote:
>>>> For DDR52 timing, DLL is enabled but tuning is not carried
>>>> out, therefore the ITAPDLY value in PHY CTRL 4 register is
>>>> not correct. Fix this by writing ITAPDLY after enabling DLL.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: a161c45f2979 ("mmc: sdhci_am654: Enable DLL only for some speed modes")
>>>
>>> Note that the Fixes tags make a different ordering
>>> than the patch order i.e.
>>>
>>> Patch    Fixes        in version
>>> 1     13ebeae68ac9     v5.10-rc1
>>> 2     a161c45f2979     v5.7-rc1
>>> 3     8ee5fc0e0b3b     v5.7-rc1
>>> 4     8ee5fc0e0b3b     v5.7-rc1
>>> 4     a0a62497f6aa     v5.10-rc1
>>> 5     fe52e2fbc6ef     v5.9-rc1
>>> 6     1accbced1c32     v5.3-rc1
>>> 7     a161c45f2979     v5.7-rc1
>>>
>>> That might make backporting these patches more challenging.
>>
>> Are you suggesting to remove the fixes tag here?
> 
> No, it is just something to think about if you intend to
> backport these patches to older kernels.

Thanks, Ill keep this in mind for v3.

> 
>>
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changelog:
>>>> v1->v2:
>>>> - Call sdhci_am654_write_itapdly() in sdhci_am654_set_clock()
>>>>    instead of sdhci_am654_setup_dll()
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 1 +
>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>>>> index 2c66a965c225..b50db5d4a452 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>>>> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ static void sdhci_am654_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>>>>          if (timing > MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25 && clock >= CLOCK_TOO_SLOW_HZ) {
>>>>            sdhci_am654_setup_dll(host, clock);
>>>> +        sdhci_am654_write_itapdly(sdhci_am654, sdhci_am654->itap_del_sel[timing]);
>>>>            sdhci_am654->dll_enable = true;
>>>>        } else {
>>>>            sdhci_am654_setup_delay_chain(sdhci_am654, timing);
>>>
>>
>> ~ Judith
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-28 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-07  1:15 [PATCH v2 0/7] Add tuning algorithm for delay chain Judith Mendez
2024-02-07  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: " Judith Mendez
2024-02-16 17:09   ` Adrian Hunter
2024-02-20 20:10     ` Judith Mendez
2024-02-28 13:21       ` Adrian Hunter
2024-02-28 15:38         ` Judith Mendez
2024-02-07  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Write ITAPDLY for DDR52 timing Judith Mendez
2024-02-12 17:13   ` Andrew Davis
2024-02-12 17:33     ` Judith Mendez
2024-02-16 17:09   ` Adrian Hunter
2024-02-20 21:05     ` Judith Mendez
2024-02-28 13:21       ` Adrian Hunter
2024-02-28 15:40         ` Judith Mendez [this message]
2024-02-07  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Add missing OTAP/ITAP enable Judith Mendez
2024-02-07  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Fix itapdly/otapdly array type Judith Mendez
2024-02-16 17:10   ` Adrian Hunter
2024-02-20 20:14     ` Judith Mendez
2024-02-07  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Update comments in sdhci_am654_set_clock Judith Mendez
2024-02-16 17:11   ` Adrian Hunter
2024-02-20 20:14     ` Judith Mendez
2024-02-07  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Add ITAPDLYSEL in sdhci_j721e_4bit_set_clock Judith Mendez
2024-02-07  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Fix ITAPDLY for HS400 timing Judith Mendez
2024-02-11 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Add tuning algorithm for delay chain Francesco Dolcini
2024-02-12 16:33   ` Judith Mendez
2024-02-12 17:32     ` Francesco Dolcini
2024-02-12 17:56       ` Judith Mendez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=34864935-2cf0-4a9f-aa52-bc6dd89da26b@ti.com \
    --to=jm@ti.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox