Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: qcom: Update RPMHPD entries for some SoCs

[Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com>]

On 7/27/2023 12:38 PM, Pavan Kondeti wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 12:24:10PM +0530, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>> On 7/27/2023 11:06 AM, Pavan Kondeti wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 10:21:10AM +0530, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>>>> Update the RPMHPD references with new bindings defined in rpmhpd.h
>>>> for Qualcomm SoCs SM8[2345]50.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml    | 3 ++-
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8350-videocc.yaml   | 3 ++-
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-camcc.yaml     | 3 ++-
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-dispcc.yaml    | 3 ++-
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml   | 3 ++-
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8550-dispcc.yaml    | 3 ++-
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,videocc.yaml          | 3 ++-
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8250-dpu.yaml | 3 ++-
>>>>    .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8250-mdss.yaml          | 7 ++++---
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8350-dpu.yaml | 3 ++-
>>>>    .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8350-mdss.yaml          | 5 +++--
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8450-dpu.yaml | 3 ++-
>>>>    .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8450-mdss.yaml          | 7 ++++---
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8550-dpu.yaml | 3 ++-
>>>>    .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8550-mdss.yaml          | 7 ++++---
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml     | 3 ++-
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml               | 3 ++-
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8350-pas.yaml  | 5 +++--
>>>>    18 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml
>>>> index d6774db..d6b81c0 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml
>>>> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ examples:
>>>>      - |
>>>>        #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
>>>>        #include <dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h>
>>>> +    #include <dt-bindings/power/qcom,rpmhpd.h>
>>>>        clock-controller@af00000 {
>>>>          compatible = "qcom,sm8250-dispcc";
>>>>          reg = <0x0af00000 0x10000>;
>>>> @@ -103,7 +104,7 @@ examples:
>>>>          #clock-cells = <1>;
>>>>          #reset-cells = <1>;
>>>>          #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>>>> -      power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8250_MMCX>;
>>>> +      power-domains = <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_MMCX>;
>>>>          required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>>>>        };
>>>>    ...
>>> Does this file still need to include old header? The same is applicable
>>> to some of the other files in the patch also.
>>>
>>> We also discussed on the other thread [1] to move the regulator level
>>> definitions to new header. should this change be done after that, so that
>>> we don't end up touching the very same files again?
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/a4zztrn6jhblozdswba7psqtvjt5l765mfr3yl4llsm5gsyqef@7x6q7yabydvm/
>> Removing this header directly would also be fine as we are not using any
>> macro defined directly in these
>> bindings.
>> I already checked with dt_binding_check by removing this header.
>>
> Thanks for checking, then we should remove the old header in this patch
> it self, right?
Yes

Thanks,
Rohit.
>
> Thanks,
> Pavan