Linux MultiMedia Card development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: fred <fred.ai@bayhubtech.com>,
	ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: shaper.liu@bayhubtech.com, chevron.li@bayhubtech.com,
	xiaoguang.yu@bayhubtech.com, shirley.her@bayhubtech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/2] mmc:sdhci-pci-o2micro: Change implementation of tuning for SDR104 and HS200 mode
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 11:18:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f35e217-f606-dbcb-2cfa-7a9105716d04@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211203035759.2183-1-fred.ai@bayhubtech.com>

On 03/12/2021 05:57, fred wrote:
> Select DLL clock of output tuning
> Select fixed output tuning phase 0x9

This commit message is a bit brief.  Can you explain a bit more,
to explain things like:
Why?  Is this a fix?  What difference does an end-user see?

If it is a fix, can you add a Fixes: tag.

> 
> Signed-off-by: fred<fred.ai@bayhubtech.com>

Add a space between fred and <fred.ai@bayhubtech.com>

> 

No blank line here

> ---
> Change in V1:
> 1. Set register 0x354 bit 16 to select DLL clock
> 2. Set register 0x354 bit [23:20] to select fiexd output tuning phase 0x9
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
> index f045c1ee4667..dfd447c1c367 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>  #define O2_SD_CAP_REG0		0x334
>  #define O2_SD_UHS1_CAP_SETTING	0x33C
>  #define O2_SD_DELAY_CTRL	0x350
> +#define O2_SD_OUTPUT_CLK_SOURCE_SWITCH	0x354
>  #define O2_SD_UHS2_L1_CTRL	0x35C
>  #define O2_SD_FUNC_REG3		0x3E0
>  #define O2_SD_FUNC_REG4		0x3E4
> @@ -304,6 +305,11 @@ static int sdhci_o2_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
>  	int current_bus_width = 0;
>  	u32 scratch32 = 0;
>  	u16 scratch = 0;
> +	u8  scratch_8 = 0;
> +	u32 reg_val;
> +	u8  dll_mode;
> +	struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = sdhci_priv(host);
> +	struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip = slot->chip;

It is nicer kernel style to try to arrange the declarations in
descending line length e.g.

	struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
	struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = sdhci_priv(host);
	struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip = slot->chip;
	int current_bus_width = 0;
	u32 scratch32 = 0;
	u16 scratch = 0;
	u8  scratch_8 = 0;
	u8  dll_mode;
	u32 reg_val;


>  
>  	/*
>  	 * This handler only implements the eMMC tuning that is specific to
> @@ -322,6 +328,28 @@ static int sdhci_o2_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
>  	scratch |= O2_SD_PWR_FORCE_L0;
>  	sdhci_writew(host, scratch, O2_SD_MISC_CTRL);
>  
> +	/*stop clk*/

For this and other comments, please put a space after '/*' and before '*/'
i.e.
	/* stop clk */

> +	reg_val = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> +	reg_val &= ~(SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN);
> +	sdhci_writew(host, reg_val, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> +
> +	/*UnLock WP*/
> +	pci_read_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, &scratch_8);
> +	scratch_8 &= 0x7f;
> +	pci_write_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, scratch_8);
> +
> +	//Set pcr 0x354[16] to choose dll clock ,and set the default phase

Please use /* ... */ instead of //

Also 'clock ,and' -> 'clock, and'

> +	dll_mode = 0x9; //set default phase 9

Please use /* ... */ instead of //

> +	pci_read_config_dword(chip->pdev, O2_SD_OUTPUT_CLK_SOURCE_SWITCH, &reg_val);
> +	reg_val &= 0xFF0EFFFF;
> +	reg_val |= ((1 << 16) | (dll_mode << 20));
> +	pci_write_config_dword(chip->pdev, O2_SD_OUTPUT_CLK_SOURCE_SWITCH, reg_val);
> +
> +    /*open clk*/

'open' -> 'start'

> +	reg_val = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> +	reg_val |= SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN;
> +	sdhci_writew(host, reg_val, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> +
>  	/* wait DLL lock, timeout value 5ms */
>  	if (readx_poll_timeout(sdhci_o2_pll_dll_wdt_control, host,
>  		scratch32, (scratch32 & O2_DLL_LOCK_STATUS), 1, 5000))
> @@ -532,24 +560,29 @@ static void sdhci_pci_o2_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>  
>  	if (clock == 0)
>  		return;
> +	/*UnLock WP*/
> +	pci_read_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, &scratch);
> +	scratch &= 0x7f;
> +	pci_write_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, scratch);
>  
>  	if ((host->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104) && (clock == 200000000)) {
> -		pci_read_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, &scratch);
> -
> -		scratch &= 0x7f;
> -		pci_write_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, scratch);
> -
>  		pci_read_config_dword(chip->pdev, O2_SD_PLL_SETTING, &scratch_32);
>  
>  		if ((scratch_32 & 0xFFFF0000) != 0x2c280000)
>  			o2_pci_set_baseclk(chip, 0x2c280000);
>  
> -		pci_read_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, &scratch);
> -
> -		scratch |= 0x80;
> -		pci_write_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, scratch);
> +		/*If not SDR104 card mode, set 0x354 value 0*/

This comment contradicts the 'if' statement before it, because
host->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104 implies that it is SDR104 card mode.


> +		pci_read_config_dword(chip->pdev, O2_SD_OUTPUT_CLK_SOURCE_SWITCH, &scratch_32);
> +		scratch_32 &= ~(1 << 16);
> +		scratch_32 &= ~(0xf << 20);
> +		pci_write_config_dword(chip->pdev, O2_SD_OUTPUT_CLK_SOURCE_SWITCH,scratch_32);

Please add a space before 'scratch_32'

>  	}
>  
> +    /*Lock WP*/
> +	pci_read_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, &scratch);
> +	scratch |= 0x80;
> +	pci_write_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, scratch);
> +
>  	clk = sdhci_calc_clk(host, clock, &host->mmc->actual_clock);
>  	sdhci_o2_enable_clk(host, clk);
>  }
> 


      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-03  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-03  3:57 [PATCH V1 1/2] mmc:sdhci-pci-o2micro: Change implementation of tuning for SDR104 and HS200 mode fred
2021-12-03  3:57 ` [PATCH V1 2/2] mmc:sdhci-pci-o2micro:Change implementation of setting corresponding PLL frequency according to card mode fred
2021-12-03  9:26   ` Adrian Hunter
2021-12-03  9:18 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6f35e217-f606-dbcb-2cfa-7a9105716d04@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=chevron.li@bayhubtech.com \
    --cc=fred.ai@bayhubtech.com \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaper.liu@bayhubtech.com \
    --cc=shirley.her@bayhubtech.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=xiaoguang.yu@bayhubtech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox