From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: fred <fred.ai@bayhubtech.com>,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: shaper.liu@bayhubtech.com, chevron.li@bayhubtech.com,
xiaoguang.yu@bayhubtech.com, shirley.her@bayhubtech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/2] mmc:sdhci-pci-o2micro: Change implementation of tuning for SDR104 and HS200 mode
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 11:18:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f35e217-f606-dbcb-2cfa-7a9105716d04@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211203035759.2183-1-fred.ai@bayhubtech.com>
On 03/12/2021 05:57, fred wrote:
> Select DLL clock of output tuning
> Select fixed output tuning phase 0x9
This commit message is a bit brief. Can you explain a bit more,
to explain things like:
Why? Is this a fix? What difference does an end-user see?
If it is a fix, can you add a Fixes: tag.
>
> Signed-off-by: fred<fred.ai@bayhubtech.com>
Add a space between fred and <fred.ai@bayhubtech.com>
>
No blank line here
> ---
> Change in V1:
> 1. Set register 0x354 bit 16 to select DLL clock
> 2. Set register 0x354 bit [23:20] to select fiexd output tuning phase 0x9
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
> index f045c1ee4667..dfd447c1c367 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> #define O2_SD_CAP_REG0 0x334
> #define O2_SD_UHS1_CAP_SETTING 0x33C
> #define O2_SD_DELAY_CTRL 0x350
> +#define O2_SD_OUTPUT_CLK_SOURCE_SWITCH 0x354
> #define O2_SD_UHS2_L1_CTRL 0x35C
> #define O2_SD_FUNC_REG3 0x3E0
> #define O2_SD_FUNC_REG4 0x3E4
> @@ -304,6 +305,11 @@ static int sdhci_o2_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> int current_bus_width = 0;
> u32 scratch32 = 0;
> u16 scratch = 0;
> + u8 scratch_8 = 0;
> + u32 reg_val;
> + u8 dll_mode;
> + struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip = slot->chip;
It is nicer kernel style to try to arrange the declarations in
descending line length e.g.
struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = sdhci_priv(host);
struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip = slot->chip;
int current_bus_width = 0;
u32 scratch32 = 0;
u16 scratch = 0;
u8 scratch_8 = 0;
u8 dll_mode;
u32 reg_val;
>
> /*
> * This handler only implements the eMMC tuning that is specific to
> @@ -322,6 +328,28 @@ static int sdhci_o2_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> scratch |= O2_SD_PWR_FORCE_L0;
> sdhci_writew(host, scratch, O2_SD_MISC_CTRL);
>
> + /*stop clk*/
For this and other comments, please put a space after '/*' and before '*/'
i.e.
/* stop clk */
> + reg_val = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> + reg_val &= ~(SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN);
> + sdhci_writew(host, reg_val, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> +
> + /*UnLock WP*/
> + pci_read_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, &scratch_8);
> + scratch_8 &= 0x7f;
> + pci_write_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, scratch_8);
> +
> + //Set pcr 0x354[16] to choose dll clock ,and set the default phase
Please use /* ... */ instead of //
Also 'clock ,and' -> 'clock, and'
> + dll_mode = 0x9; //set default phase 9
Please use /* ... */ instead of //
> + pci_read_config_dword(chip->pdev, O2_SD_OUTPUT_CLK_SOURCE_SWITCH, ®_val);
> + reg_val &= 0xFF0EFFFF;
> + reg_val |= ((1 << 16) | (dll_mode << 20));
> + pci_write_config_dword(chip->pdev, O2_SD_OUTPUT_CLK_SOURCE_SWITCH, reg_val);
> +
> + /*open clk*/
'open' -> 'start'
> + reg_val = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> + reg_val |= SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN;
> + sdhci_writew(host, reg_val, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> +
> /* wait DLL lock, timeout value 5ms */
> if (readx_poll_timeout(sdhci_o2_pll_dll_wdt_control, host,
> scratch32, (scratch32 & O2_DLL_LOCK_STATUS), 1, 5000))
> @@ -532,24 +560,29 @@ static void sdhci_pci_o2_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>
> if (clock == 0)
> return;
> + /*UnLock WP*/
> + pci_read_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, &scratch);
> + scratch &= 0x7f;
> + pci_write_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, scratch);
>
> if ((host->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104) && (clock == 200000000)) {
> - pci_read_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, &scratch);
> -
> - scratch &= 0x7f;
> - pci_write_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, scratch);
> -
> pci_read_config_dword(chip->pdev, O2_SD_PLL_SETTING, &scratch_32);
>
> if ((scratch_32 & 0xFFFF0000) != 0x2c280000)
> o2_pci_set_baseclk(chip, 0x2c280000);
>
> - pci_read_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, &scratch);
> -
> - scratch |= 0x80;
> - pci_write_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, scratch);
> + /*If not SDR104 card mode, set 0x354 value 0*/
This comment contradicts the 'if' statement before it, because
host->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104 implies that it is SDR104 card mode.
> + pci_read_config_dword(chip->pdev, O2_SD_OUTPUT_CLK_SOURCE_SWITCH, &scratch_32);
> + scratch_32 &= ~(1 << 16);
> + scratch_32 &= ~(0xf << 20);
> + pci_write_config_dword(chip->pdev, O2_SD_OUTPUT_CLK_SOURCE_SWITCH,scratch_32);
Please add a space before 'scratch_32'
> }
>
> + /*Lock WP*/
> + pci_read_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, &scratch);
> + scratch |= 0x80;
> + pci_write_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, scratch);
> +
> clk = sdhci_calc_clk(host, clock, &host->mmc->actual_clock);
> sdhci_o2_enable_clk(host, clk);
> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-03 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-03 3:57 [PATCH V1 1/2] mmc:sdhci-pci-o2micro: Change implementation of tuning for SDR104 and HS200 mode fred
2021-12-03 3:57 ` [PATCH V1 2/2] mmc:sdhci-pci-o2micro:Change implementation of setting corresponding PLL frequency according to card mode fred
2021-12-03 9:26 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-12-03 9:18 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6f35e217-f606-dbcb-2cfa-7a9105716d04@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=chevron.li@bayhubtech.com \
--cc=fred.ai@bayhubtech.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaper.liu@bayhubtech.com \
--cc=shirley.her@bayhubtech.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=xiaoguang.yu@bayhubtech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox