From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ricky WU <ricky_wu@realtek.com>, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/9] mmc: core: Add open-ended Ext memory addressing
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 11:02:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc704a6e-962e-4294-9d97-ca43144adbc6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240904145256.3670679-4-avri.altman@wdc.com>
On 4/09/24 17:52, Avri Altman wrote:
> For open-ended read/write - just send CMD22 before issuing the command.
> While at it, make sure that the rw command arg is properly casting the
> lower 32 bits, as it can be larger now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 6 +++++-
> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 3 +++
> include/linux/mmc/core.h | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> index cc7318089cf2..54469261bc25 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
> static void mmc_blk_hsq_req_done(struct mmc_request *mrq);
> static int mmc_spi_err_check(struct mmc_card *card);
> static int mmc_blk_busy_cb(void *cb_data, bool *busy);
> +static int mmc_blk_wait_for_idle(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct mmc_host *host);
Not using mmc_blk_wait_for_idle() anymore.
>
> static struct mmc_blk_data *mmc_blk_get(struct gendisk *disk)
> {
> @@ -1710,7 +1711,7 @@ static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
>
> brq->mrq.cmd = &brq->cmd;
>
> - brq->cmd.arg = blk_rq_pos(req);
> + brq->cmd.arg = blk_rq_pos(req) & 0xFFFFFFFF;
arg is 32 bits so not needed
> if (!mmc_card_blockaddr(card))
> brq->cmd.arg <<= 9;
> brq->cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_ADTC;
> @@ -1758,6 +1759,9 @@ static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
> (do_data_tag ? (1 << 29) : 0);
> brq->sbc.flags = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC;
> brq->mrq.sbc = &brq->sbc;
> + } else if (mmc_card_ult_capacity(card)) {
The 'else' isn't actually needed, is it? Might as well keep sbc
and ext_addr separate in this patch.
> + brq->cmd.ext_addr = (blk_rq_pos(req) >> 32) & 0x3F;
'& 0x3f' should not be needed. i.e. we either validate blk_rq_pos(req)
(no point) or we assume it is valid.
> + brq->cmd.has_ext_addr = 1;
If you switch to bool, that could use 'true' instead of '1'
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index d6c819dd68ed..a0b2999684b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -336,6 +336,9 @@ int mmc_start_request(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> {
> int err;
>
> + if (mrq->cmd && mrq->cmd->has_ext_addr)
> + mmc_send_ext_addr(host, mrq->cmd->ext_addr);
> +
> init_completion(&mrq->cmd_completion);
>
> mmc_retune_hold(host);
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/core.h b/include/linux/mmc/core.h
> index f0ac2e469b32..41c21c216584 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/core.h
> @@ -76,6 +76,11 @@ struct mmc_command {
> */
> #define mmc_cmd_type(cmd) ((cmd)->flags & MMC_CMD_MASK)
>
> + /* for SDUC */
> + u8 has_ext_addr;
> + u8 ext_addr;
> + u16 reserved;
> +
> unsigned int retries; /* max number of retries */
> int error; /* command error */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-06 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-04 14:52 [PATCH v6 0/9] Add SDUC Support Avri Altman
2024-09-04 14:52 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] mmc: sd: SDUC Support Recognition Avri Altman
2024-09-06 6:39 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-09-06 8:10 ` Avri Altman
2024-09-04 14:52 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] mmc: sd: Add Extension memory addressing Avri Altman
2024-09-04 14:52 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] mmc: core: Add open-ended Ext " Avri Altman
2024-09-04 22:13 ` Christian Loehle
2024-09-05 6:12 ` Avri Altman
2024-09-05 7:25 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-09-05 8:27 ` Christian Loehle
2024-09-05 9:47 ` Avri Altman
2024-09-06 8:02 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2024-09-06 8:20 ` Avri Altman
2024-09-06 8:33 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-09-06 10:11 ` Avri Altman
2024-09-04 14:52 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] mmc: core: Don't use close-ended rw for SDUC Avri Altman
2024-09-04 14:52 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] mmc: core: Allow mmc erase to carry large addresses Avri Altman
2024-09-04 14:52 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] mmc: core: Add Ext memory addressing for erase Avri Altman
2024-09-06 10:06 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-09-06 10:14 ` Avri Altman
2024-09-04 14:52 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] mmc: core: Adjust ACMD22 to SDUC Avri Altman
2024-09-06 10:57 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-09-06 11:07 ` Avri Altman
2024-09-04 14:52 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] mmc: core: Disable SDUC for mmc_test Avri Altman
2024-09-06 10:10 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-09-06 10:15 ` Avri Altman
2024-09-04 14:52 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] mmc: core: Enable SDUC Avri Altman
2024-09-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 0/9] Add SDUC Support Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc704a6e-962e-4294-9d97-ca43144adbc6@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ricky_wu@realtek.com \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox