Re: [PATCH] dw_mmc: fixed wrong regulator_enable in suspend/resume

[Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>]

Hi Jaehoon,

On Wed, May 11 2011, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> In suspend function, regulator_enable() need not.
> regulator_enable() should be locate in resume function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 87e1f57..66dcddb 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -1769,9 +1769,6 @@ static int dw_mci_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t mesg)
>  	int i, ret;
>  	struct dw_mci *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  
> -	if (host->vmmc)
> -		regulator_enable(host->vmmc);
> -
>  	for (i = 0; i < host->num_slots; i++) {
>  		struct dw_mci_slot *slot = host->slot[i];
>  		if (!slot)
> @@ -1798,6 +1795,9 @@ static int dw_mci_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	int i, ret;
>  	struct dw_mci *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  
> +	if (host->vmmc)
> +		regulator_enable(host->vmmc);
> +
>  	if (host->dma_ops->init)
>  		host->dma_ops->init(host);
>  

Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for .40 with Will's ACK.

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@laptop.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child