* [PATCH module v2] module: Fix uninitialized count read of unloaded taint tracking record
@ 2026-10-10 8:03 Binbin Deng
2026-10-14 9:23 ` Petr Pavlu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Binbin Deng @ 2026-10-10 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mcgrof, petr.pavlu, da.gomez, samitolvanen, atomlin
Cc: linux-modules, linux-kernel, Binbin Deng
try_add_tainted_module() allocates the tracking record without zeroing
it and initializes the fields in this order:
mod_taint = kmalloc_obj(*mod_taint);
strscpy(mod_taint->name, mod->name, MODULE_NAME_LEN);
mod_taint->taints = mod->taints;
list_add_rcu(&mod_taint->list, &unloaded_tainted_modules);
mod_taint->count = 1;
The record is published by list_add_rcu() before the count field is
written. The readers, unloaded_tainted_modules_seq_show() (debugfs,
under rcu_read_lock()) and print_unloaded_tainted_modules() (panic
path, under guard(rcu)), traverse the list under RCU and read
mod_taint->count. module_mutex, which the writer holds, does not
exclude RCU readers.
A reader that observes the new node between the list_add_rcu() and
the count store reads an uninitialized u64 left over from previous
slab use. This is a data race and leaks kernel heap residue through
the debugfs file and the panic message.
The race window is two adjacent instructions; it is reachable when a
tainted module is unloaded (rmmod) concurrently with a read of
/sys/kernel/debug/module/unloaded_tainted, or with the module list
printout of an oops on another CPU.
Fix this by initializing count before the record is published.
Found during a static-analysis-assisted audit: candidate sites were
surfaced by a Coccinelle rule, and the reader/writer paths were
confirmed by LLM-assisted (GLM-5.3) code inspection. The issue was
not observed at runtime; it is identified by code inspection only.
Fixes: 99bd9956551b ("module: Introduce module unload taint tracking")
Signed-off-by: Binbin Deng <18983559317@163.com>
---
kernel/module/tracking.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/module/tracking.c b/kernel/module/tracking.c
index 9033ff54c4e2..9e8902600c32 100644
--- a/kernel/module/tracking.c
+++ b/kernel/module/tracking.c
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ int try_add_tainted_module(struct module *mod)
return -ENOMEM;
strscpy(mod_taint->name, mod->name, MODULE_NAME_LEN);
mod_taint->taints = mod->taints;
- list_add_rcu(&mod_taint->list, &unloaded_tainted_modules);
mod_taint->count = 1;
+ list_add_rcu(&mod_taint->list, &unloaded_tainted_modules);
out:
return 0;
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH module v2] module: Fix uninitialized count read of unloaded taint tracking record
2026-10-10 8:03 [PATCH module v2] module: Fix uninitialized count read of unloaded taint tracking record Binbin Deng
@ 2026-10-14 9:23 ` Petr Pavlu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Petr Pavlu @ 2026-10-14 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Binbin Deng
Cc: mcgrof, da.gomez, samitolvanen, atomlin, linux-modules,
linux-kernel
On 10/10/26 10:03 AM, Binbin Deng wrote:
> try_add_tainted_module() allocates the tracking record without zeroing
> it and initializes the fields in this order:
>
> mod_taint = kmalloc_obj(*mod_taint);
> strscpy(mod_taint->name, mod->name, MODULE_NAME_LEN);
> mod_taint->taints = mod->taints;
> list_add_rcu(&mod_taint->list, &unloaded_tainted_modules);
> mod_taint->count = 1;
>
> The record is published by list_add_rcu() before the count field is
> written. The readers, unloaded_tainted_modules_seq_show() (debugfs,
> under rcu_read_lock()) and print_unloaded_tainted_modules() (panic
> path, under guard(rcu)), traverse the list under RCU and read
> mod_taint->count. module_mutex, which the writer holds, does not
> exclude RCU readers.
>
> A reader that observes the new node between the list_add_rcu() and
> the count store reads an uninitialized u64 left over from previous
> slab use. This is a data race and leaks kernel heap residue through
> the debugfs file and the panic message.
>
> The race window is two adjacent instructions; it is reachable when a
> tainted module is unloaded (rmmod) concurrently with a read of
> /sys/kernel/debug/module/unloaded_tainted, or with the module list
> printout of an oops on another CPU.
>
> Fix this by initializing count before the record is published.
>
> Found during a static-analysis-assisted audit: candidate sites were
> surfaced by a Coccinelle rule, and the reader/writer paths were
> confirmed by LLM-assisted (GLM-5.3) code inspection. The issue was
> not observed at runtime; it is identified by code inspection only.
>
> Fixes: 99bd9956551b ("module: Introduce module unload taint tracking")
> Signed-off-by: Binbin Deng <18983559317@163.com>
Looks ok, I've queued the patch on modules-next for v7.4-rc1.
--
Thanks,
Petr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-14 9:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-10 8:03 [PATCH module v2] module: Fix uninitialized count read of unloaded taint tracking record Binbin Deng
2026-10-14 9:23 ` Petr Pavlu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox