public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: "Hauke Mehrtens" <hauke@hauke-m.de>, "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC 0/3] mtd: bcm47xxnflash: adding support for new NANDs
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 12:26:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1393154819-7369-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> (raw)

New Broadcom SoCs have NAND flashes attached & programmed in a totally different
way. Instead of accessing them with help of ChipCommon core, they can be used
directly.

To support them we can extend bcm47xxnflash in the way this patches implements.
However almost nothing in the code will be shared between support for old and
new devices.

How should we proceed? Implement it that way anyway? Or maybe writing a
separated driver (bcm53xxnflash?) would be a better idea?

Rafał Miłecki (3):
  Revert "mtd: bcm47xxnflash: Use module_platform_driver"
  mtd: bcm47xxnflash: add separated config for platform driver
  mtd: bcm47xxnflash: prepare for adding BCMA driver

 drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig                | 25 ++++++++---
 drivers/mtd/nand/bcm47xxnflash/Makefile |  2 +-
 drivers/mtd/nand/bcm47xxnflash/main.c   | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.4.5

             reply	other threads:[~2014-02-23 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-23 11:26 Rafał Miłecki [this message]
2014-02-23 11:26 ` [RFC 1/3] Revert "mtd: bcm47xxnflash: Use module_platform_driver" Rafał Miłecki
2014-02-23 11:26 ` [RFC 2/3] mtd: bcm47xxnflash: add separated config for platform driver Rafał Miłecki
2014-02-23 11:26 ` [RFC 3/3] mtd: bcm47xxnflash: prepare for adding BCMA driver Rafał Miłecki
2014-02-23 11:31 ` [RFC 0/3] mtd: bcm47xxnflash: adding support for new NANDs Hauke Mehrtens
2014-02-26  3:09   ` Brian Norris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1393154819-7369-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com \
    --to=zajec5@gmail.com \
    --cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox