From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3][v3] mtd: nand: davinci: set ECC algorithm explicitly for HW based ECC
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 12:30:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170502123053.6437e04b@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170502110045.29cb9121@bbrezillon>
On Tue, 2 May 2017 11:00:45 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 May 2017 10:13:23 +0200
> Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu> wrote:
>
> > Required to set the ooblayout based on the algorithm.
>
> Not strictly required if you take my comment into account (see my
> reply to patch 2). This being said, it's always to have this kind of
> information, I'll just have to check if it doesn't conflict with
> Masahiro's patches.
Never mind, I'm just mixing up davinci and denali :-).
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c
> > index 27fa8b87cd5f..9e5167496ce1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c
> > @@ -760,11 +760,13 @@ static int nand_davinci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > info->chip.ecc.hwctl = nand_davinci_hwctl_4bit;
> > info->chip.ecc.bytes = 10;
> > info->chip.ecc.options = NAND_ECC_GENERIC_ERASED_CHECK;
> > - } else {
> > + info->chip.ecc.algo = NAND_ECC_BCH;
> > + } else { /* 1bit ecc hamming */
>
> Please put this comment on the next line.
>
> > info->chip.ecc.calculate = nand_davinci_calculate_1bit;
> > info->chip.ecc.correct = nand_davinci_correct_1bit;
> > info->chip.ecc.hwctl = nand_davinci_hwctl_1bit;
> > info->chip.ecc.bytes = 3;
> > + info->chip.ecc.algo = NAND_ECC_HAMMING;
> > }
> > info->chip.ecc.size = 512;
> > info->chip.ecc.strength = pdata->ecc_bits;
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-02 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-12 20:02 [PATCH] nand_base: fix regression on nand with 64/128 oob size Alexander Couzens
2017-03-13 6:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-02 8:13 ` [PATCH 0/3][v2] fixing 1bit hamming Alexander Couzens
2017-05-02 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-02 10:19 ` [PATCH][v3] mtd: nand: add ooblayout for old hamming layout Alexander Couzens
2017-05-02 12:03 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-03 1:57 ` Brian Norris
2017-05-02 8:13 ` [PATCH 1/3][v2] mtd/nand: " Alexander Couzens
2017-05-02 8:41 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-02 8:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-02 8:13 ` [PATCH 2/3][v2] nand_base: use nand_ooblayout_lp_hamming_ops for 1bit hamming as default Alexander Couzens
2017-05-02 8:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-02 8:13 ` [PATCH 3/3][v3] mtd: nand: davinci: set ECC algorithm explicitly for HW based ECC Alexander Couzens
2017-05-02 9:00 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-02 10:30 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170502123053.6437e04b@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lynxis@fe80.eu \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox