From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3][v3] mtd: nand: davinci: set ECC algorithm explicitly for HW based ECC
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 11:00:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170502110045.29cb9121@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170502081323.3138-4-lynxis@fe80.eu>
On Tue, 2 May 2017 10:13:23 +0200
Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu> wrote:
> Required to set the ooblayout based on the algorithm.
Not strictly required if you take my comment into account (see my
reply to patch 2). This being said, it's always to have this kind of
information, I'll just have to check if it doesn't conflict with
Masahiro's patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c
> index 27fa8b87cd5f..9e5167496ce1 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c
> @@ -760,11 +760,13 @@ static int nand_davinci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> info->chip.ecc.hwctl = nand_davinci_hwctl_4bit;
> info->chip.ecc.bytes = 10;
> info->chip.ecc.options = NAND_ECC_GENERIC_ERASED_CHECK;
> - } else {
> + info->chip.ecc.algo = NAND_ECC_BCH;
> + } else { /* 1bit ecc hamming */
Please put this comment on the next line.
> info->chip.ecc.calculate = nand_davinci_calculate_1bit;
> info->chip.ecc.correct = nand_davinci_correct_1bit;
> info->chip.ecc.hwctl = nand_davinci_hwctl_1bit;
> info->chip.ecc.bytes = 3;
> + info->chip.ecc.algo = NAND_ECC_HAMMING;
> }
> info->chip.ecc.size = 512;
> info->chip.ecc.strength = pdata->ecc_bits;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-02 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-12 20:02 [PATCH] nand_base: fix regression on nand with 64/128 oob size Alexander Couzens
2017-03-13 6:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-02 8:13 ` [PATCH 0/3][v2] fixing 1bit hamming Alexander Couzens
2017-05-02 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-02 10:19 ` [PATCH][v3] mtd: nand: add ooblayout for old hamming layout Alexander Couzens
2017-05-02 12:03 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-03 1:57 ` Brian Norris
2017-05-02 8:13 ` [PATCH 1/3][v2] mtd/nand: " Alexander Couzens
2017-05-02 8:41 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-02 8:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-02 8:13 ` [PATCH 2/3][v2] nand_base: use nand_ooblayout_lp_hamming_ops for 1bit hamming as default Alexander Couzens
2017-05-02 8:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-02 8:13 ` [PATCH 3/3][v3] mtd: nand: davinci: set ECC algorithm explicitly for HW based ECC Alexander Couzens
2017-05-02 9:00 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-05-02 10:30 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170502110045.29cb9121@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lynxis@fe80.eu \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox