Re: [PATCH][next] mtd: nand: fix spelling mistake: "suceed"-> "succeed"

[Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com>]

Hello,

Can you please change the prefix, it should be:

mtd: nand: marvell:

On Tue, 16 Jan
2018 12:06:08 +0100 walter harms <wharms@bfs.de> wrote:

> Am 16.01.2018 11:28, schrieb Colin King:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > 
> > Trivial fix to spelling mistakes in dev_err error message text.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/marvell_nand.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/marvell_nand.c
> > b/drivers/mtd/nand/marvell_nand.c index b8fec6093b75..4bd53b360277
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/marvell_nand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/marvell_nand.c
> > @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ static int marvell_nfc_prepare_cmd(struct
> > nand_chip *chip) /* Poll ND_RUN and clear NDSR before issuing any
> > command */ ret = marvell_nfc_wait_ndrun(chip);
> >  	if (ret) {
> > -		dev_err(nfc->dev, "Last operation did not
> > suceed\n");
> > +		dev_err(nfc->dev, "Last operation did not
> > succeed\n"); return ret;
> >  	}
> >    
> 
> not succeed == Failed ??

I personally do not have a preference, as long as there is a clear
error message in this case.

> someone who is debugging may also interessted to know what operation
> failed.

It is not as easy to do, but starting from enabling dynamic debug in
both the driver and the NAND core should give you enough traces to
locate the issue.

Thanks,
Miquèl