Re: [PATCH v5 12/17] mtd: rawnand: tegra: convert driver to nand_scan()

[Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>]

Hi Stefan,

Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> wrote on Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:13:09 +0200:

> On 26.07.2018 20:01, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:29:36 +0200
> > Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 25.07.2018 15:31, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> >> > Two helpers have been added to the core to do all kind of controller
> >> > side configuration/initialization between the detection phase and the
> >> > final NAND scan. Implement these hooks so that we can convert the driver
> >> > to just use nand_scan() instead of the nand_scan_ident() +
> >> > nand_scan_tail() pair.
> >> >  
> >>
> >> While the patch looks technically correct, I wonder whether the driver
> >> now does what we expect it from attach logically...
> >>
> >> E.g. shouldn't we get the wp_gpio in attach?  
> > 
> > Well, this series does things mechanically to avoid breaking drivers (we
> > just move all the code between ident and tail into the attach hook),
> > but any resource that is not needed for the identification phase and is
> > tied to the NAND chip could/should be requested in the attach hook (the
> > WP pin is such a resource).  
> 
> Ok, that makes completely sense and I agree with that approach! However,
> it is not obvious when looking at the series.
> 
> Can we mention that fact in the commit log, e.g. something like:
> 
> "To avoid breaking this patch converts the driver mechanically by just
> moving all the code between ...ident and ..tail into the attach hook.
> Ideally driver should request all resources tied to the NAND chip in the
> attach hook."

As Boris said, the whole change was somehow mechanic, I already had a
hard time understanding what each driver wanted to achieve between
those two functions, I did not dig any further as it was already very
time consuming. A cleanup of many drivers would be appreciated though.

As this would apply to the 30 patches of the series and because I
already merged all of them, I think I'll pass for this one, even if I
completely agree with the request.

Thanks,
Miquèl