[RFC PATCH v2] mtd: nand: toshiba: Add support for ->exec_op()

[RFC PATCH v2] mtd: nand: toshiba: Add support for ->exec_op()

[KOBAYASHI Yoshitake]

This patch is a patch to support TOSHIBA MEMORY CORPORATION BENAND
memory devices.  This use vendor specific command
(TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS) to know the exact bitflips.  However, I
could not test this patch because I do not have a platform that
supports chip-> exec_op.  Therefore, I post this patch as RFC.

As soon as I get a platform that supports chip-> exec_op, I would like
to test and re-post.

Signed-off-by: KOBAYASHI Yoshitake <yoshitake.kobayashi@toshiba.co.jp>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
index 8aec3fa..3f4683b 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
@@ -23,14 +23,65 @@
 /* Recommended to rewrite for BENAND */
 #define TOSHIBA_NAND_STATUS_REWRITE_RECOMMENDED	BIT(3)
 
+/* ECC Status Read Command for BENAND */
+#define TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS_READ	0x7A
+
+/* ECC Status Mask for BENAND */
+#define TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_MASK		0x0F
+
+/* Uncorrectable Error for BENAND */
+#define TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_UNCORR		0x0F
+
+static int toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op(struct nand_chip *chip,
+						 u8 *buf)
+{
+	u8 *ecc_status = buf;
+
+	if (chip->exec_op) {
+		const struct nand_sdr_timings *sdr =
+			nand_get_sdr_timings(&chip->data_interface);
+		struct nand_op_instr instrs[] = {
+			NAND_OP_CMD(TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS_READ,
+				    PSEC_TO_NSEC(sdr->tADL_min)),
+			NAND_OP_8BIT_DATA_IN(chip->ecc.steps, ecc_status, 0),
+		};
+		struct nand_operation op = NAND_OPERATION(instrs);
+
+		return nand_exec_op(chip, &op);
+	}
+
+	return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
+
 static int toshiba_nand_benand_eccstatus(struct mtd_info *mtd,
 					 struct nand_chip *chip)
 {
 	int ret;
 	unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
-	u8 status;
+	u8 status, ecc_status[8];
 
 	/* Check Status */
+	ret = toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op(chip, ecc_status);
+	if (!ret) {
+		unsigned int i, bitflips = 0;
+
+		for (i = 0; i < chip->ecc.steps; i++) {
+			bitflips = ecc_status[i] & TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_MASK;
+			if (bitflips == TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_UNCORR) {
+				mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
+			} else {
+				mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += bitflips;
+				max_bitflips = max(max_bitflips, bitflips);
+			}
+		}
+
+		return max_bitflips;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Fallback to regular status check if
+	 * toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op() failed.
+	 */
 	ret = nand_status_op(chip, &status);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [RFC PATCH v2] mtd: nand: toshiba: Add support for ->exec_op()

[Boris Brezillon]

On Sat,  4 Aug 2018 14:26:18 +0900
KOBAYASHI Yoshitake <yoshitake.kobayashi@toshiba.co.jp> wrote:

> This patch is a patch to support TOSHIBA MEMORY CORPORATION BENAND
> memory devices.  This use vendor specific command
> (TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS) to know the exact bitflips.  However, I

					    ^ exact number of bitflips

> could not test this patch because I do not have a platform that
> supports chip-> exec_op.  Therefore, I post this patch as RFC.

	   ^ chip->exec_op()

How about adding ->exec_op() support to the controller driver you're
testing with?

> As soon as I get a platform that supports chip-> exec_op, I would like
> to test and re-post.

All the explanation about why this is an RFC should be placed after the
'---' separator so that it does not appear when we apply the patch.

> 
> Signed-off-by: KOBAYASHI Yoshitake <yoshitake.kobayashi@toshiba.co.jp>

With the commit message adjusted as suggested above,

Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>


> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
> index 8aec3fa..3f4683b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
> @@ -23,14 +23,65 @@
>  /* Recommended to rewrite for BENAND */
>  #define TOSHIBA_NAND_STATUS_REWRITE_RECOMMENDED	BIT(3)
>  
> +/* ECC Status Read Command for BENAND */
> +#define TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS_READ	0x7A
> +
> +/* ECC Status Mask for BENAND */
> +#define TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_MASK		0x0F
> +
> +/* Uncorrectable Error for BENAND */
> +#define TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_UNCORR		0x0F
> +
> +static int toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op(struct nand_chip *chip,
> +						 u8 *buf)
> +{
> +	u8 *ecc_status = buf;
> +
> +	if (chip->exec_op) {
> +		const struct nand_sdr_timings *sdr =
> +			nand_get_sdr_timings(&chip->data_interface);
> +		struct nand_op_instr instrs[] = {
> +			NAND_OP_CMD(TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS_READ,
> +				    PSEC_TO_NSEC(sdr->tADL_min)),
> +			NAND_OP_8BIT_DATA_IN(chip->ecc.steps, ecc_status, 0),
> +		};
> +		struct nand_operation op = NAND_OPERATION(instrs);
> +
> +		return nand_exec_op(chip, &op);
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
>  static int toshiba_nand_benand_eccstatus(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>  					 struct nand_chip *chip)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  	unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
> -	u8 status;
> +	u8 status, ecc_status[8];
>  
>  	/* Check Status */
> +	ret = toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op(chip, ecc_status);
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		unsigned int i, bitflips = 0;
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < chip->ecc.steps; i++) {
> +			bitflips = ecc_status[i] & TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_MASK;
> +			if (bitflips == TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_UNCORR) {
> +				mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> +			} else {
> +				mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += bitflips;
> +				max_bitflips = max(max_bitflips, bitflips);
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		return max_bitflips;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Fallback to regular status check if
> +	 * toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op() failed.
> +	 */
>  	ret = nand_status_op(chip, &status);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;