From: David Oberhollenzer <goliath@sigma-star.at>
To: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
Cc: Levente <leventelist@gmail.com>,
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org, richard <richard@sigma-star.at>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT mtd tooling vs mtd-utils
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 13:15:32 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <351822581.163754.1526642132964.JavaMail.zimbra@sigma-star.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73497de5-6ea1-2662-2cc1-c5047e29d865@mein.io>
Thanks for the clarification!
Just out of curiosity, is there a specific reason why OpenWRT uses its
own formatting utility here instead of using the tools from mtd-utils?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jo-Philipp Wich" <jo@mein.io>
To: "David Oberhollenzer" <goliath@sigma-star.at>, "Levente" <leventelist@gmail.com>, openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Cc: "richard" <richard@sigma-star.at>, "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 12:26:48 PM
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT mtd tooling vs mtd-utils
Hello David,
this was actually my fault. I didn't pay close attention and assumed the
code to be related to the kernel MTD subsystem. Only now after your mail
I realized that it affects the OpenWrt specific formatting utility.
I am very sorry for the confusion caused.
Kind regards,
Jo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-18 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-18 8:00 mtd Levente
2018-05-18 9:09 ` mtd David Oberhollenzer
2018-05-18 9:14 ` mtd Levente
[not found] ` <1397936863.163523.1526636992502.JavaMail.zimbra@sigma-star.at>
2018-05-18 10:26 ` [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT mtd tooling vs mtd-utils Jo-Philipp Wich
2018-05-18 11:15 ` David Oberhollenzer [this message]
2018-07-13 9:54 ` Rafał Miłecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=351822581.163754.1526642132964.JavaMail.zimbra@sigma-star.at \
--to=goliath@sigma-star.at \
--cc=jo@mein.io \
--cc=leventelist@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org \
--cc=richard@sigma-star.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox