From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: bio segment constraints
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 08:10:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b8c4805-a91f-4455-a021-e5d8b6078d8b@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0ffa9b9-8649-1b63-3d56-3fc45fdfda83@gmail.com>
On 4/7/25 16:14, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 4/7/25 03:10, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 4/6/25 21:40, Sean Anderson wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm not really sure what guarantees the block layer makes regarding the
>>> segments in a bio as part of a request submitted to a block driver. As
>>> far as I can tell this is not documented anywhere. In particular,
>>>
>>> - Is bv_len aligned to SECTOR_SIZE?
>>
>> The block layer always uses a 512 byte sector size, so yes.
>>
>>> - To logical_sector_size?
>>
>> Not necessarily. Bvecs are a consecutive list of byte ranges which
>> make up the data portion of a bio.
>> The logical sector size is a property of the request queue, which is
>> applied when a request is formed from one or several bios.
>> For the request the overall length need to be a multiple of the logical
>> sector size, but not necessarily the individual bios.
>
> Oh, so this is worse than I thought. So if you care about e.g. only
> submitting I/O in units of logical_block_size, you have to combine
> segments across the entire request.>
Well, yes, and no.
You might be seeing a request with several bios, each having small
bvecs. But in the driver you will want to use an iov iterator or map
it into a sg list via blk_rq_map_sg(), and then iterate over that
for submission.
[ .. ]
>>> - Can I somehow request to only get segments with bv_len aligned to
>>> logical_sector_size? Or do I need to do my own coalescing and bounce
>>> buffering for that?
>>>
>>
>> The driver surely can. You should be able to set 'max_segment_size' to
>> the logical block size, and that should give you what you want.
>
> But couldn't I get segments smaller than that? max_segment_size seems like
> it would only restrict the maximum size, leaving the possibility open for
> smaller segments.
>
As mentioned: individual segments might. The overall request still will
adhere to the logical block size setting (ie it will never be smaller
than the logical block size).
Maybe have a look at drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c. There the driver will
map the request onto a scatterlist, and then iterate over the sg entries
to read in the data.
Note: mapping onto a scatterlist will coalesce adjacent bvecs, so on the
scatterlist you will find only contiguous segments which adhere to the
logical block size linmitations.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-08 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-06 19:40 bio segment constraints Sean Anderson
2025-04-07 7:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-07 13:46 ` Keith Busch
2025-04-07 13:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-07 15:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-04-07 13:59 ` Sean Anderson
2025-04-07 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-07 7:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-07 14:14 ` Sean Anderson
2025-04-08 6:10 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2025-04-08 13:57 ` Sean Anderson
2025-04-08 14:33 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b8c4805-a91f-4455-a021-e5d8b6078d8b@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=seanga2@gmail.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox