From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: bio segment constraints
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 00:07:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_N5nxLDOBb5NDAM@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8dfd97ac-59e7-ae69-238a-85b7a2dae4f1@gmail.com>
On Sun, Apr 06, 2025 at 03:40:04PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not really sure what guarantees the block layer makes regarding the
> segments in a bio as part of a request submitted to a block driver. As
> far as I can tell this is not documented anywhere. In particular,
First you need to define what segment you mean. We have at least two and
a half historical uses of the name. One is for each bio_vec attached to
the bio, either directly as submitted into ->submit_bio for bio based
drivers (case 1a), or generated by bio_split_to_limits (case 1b), which
is called for every blk-mq driver before calling into ->queue_rq(s) or
explicitly called by a few bio based driver.
The other is the bio-vec synthesized by bio_for_each_segment (case 2).
> - Is bv_len aligned to SECTOR_SIZE?
Yes.
> - To logical_sector_size?
Yes.
> - What if logical_sector_size > PAGE_SIZE?
Still always aligned to logical_sector_size.
> - What about bv_offset?
bv_offset is a memory offset and must only be aligned to the
dma_alignment limit.
> - Is it possible to have a bio where the total length is a multiple of
> logical_sector_size, but the data is split across several segments
> where each segment is a multiple of SECTOR_SIZE?
Yes.
> - Is is possible to have segments not even aligned to SECTOR_SIZE?
No.
> - Can I somehow request to only get segments with bv_len aligned to
> logical_sector_size?
For drivers that use bio_split_to_limits implicitly or explicitly you can
do that by setting the right seg_boundary_mask.
> make some big assumptions (which might be bugs?) For example, in
> drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c, do_blktrans_request looks like:
> - There is only one bio in a request. This one is a bit of a soft
> assumption since we should only flush the pages in the bio and not the
> whole request otherwise.
It always operates on the first bio in the request and then uses
blk_update_request to move the context past that. It is an old
and somewhat arkane way to write drivers, but should work. The
rq_for_each_segment looks do call flush_dcache_page look horribly
wrong for this model, though.
> - The data is in lowmem OR bv_offset + bv_len <= PAGE_SIZE. kmap() only
> maps a single page, so if we go past one page we end up in adjacent
> kmapped pages.
Yes, this looks broken.
> Am I missing something here? Handling highmem seems like a persistent
> issue. E.g. drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c doesn't even bother doing a kmap.
> Should both of these have BLK_FEAT_BOUNCE_HIGH?
BLK_FEAT_BOUNCE_HIGH needs to go away rather sooner than later.
in the short run the best fix would be to synthesized a
bio_for_each_segment like bio_vec that stays inside a single page
using bio_iter_iovec) at the top of do_blktrans_request and use
that for all references to the data.
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-06 19:40 bio segment constraints Sean Anderson
2025-04-07 7:07 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-04-07 13:46 ` Keith Busch
2025-04-07 13:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-07 15:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-04-07 13:59 ` Sean Anderson
2025-04-07 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-07 7:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-07 14:14 ` Sean Anderson
2025-04-08 6:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-08 13:57 ` Sean Anderson
2025-04-08 14:33 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_N5nxLDOBb5NDAM@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=seanga2@gmail.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox