From: "Paul Kraus" <pkraus@pelsupply.com>
To: 'Frank Roberts - SOTL' <sotl155360@earthlink.net>,
linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: RedHat 8
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:31:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <007001c27ad3$398c0140$64fea8c0@pkrausxp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200210231624.32476.sotl155360@earthlink.net>
4 for and 1 against. You really slammed it. Can I inquire as to why you
like suse? I have only used mandrake 7 and 8, RedHat 6 briefly, 7.3 now.
-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Roberts - SOTL [mailto:sotl155360@earthlink.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Paul Kraus; linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RedHat 8
First the major change in RH 5.0 to 6.0 to 7.0 to 8.0 appear to be major
changes in the RH side of the software meaning major changes in the
installation and configuration programs.
The changes in x.0 to x.2 to x.3 appear to be changes in the content and
progressive increases (sometimes) in stability.
For RH 7.3 to RH 8.0 the kernel was increased to 2.4.18 from 2.4.3 (I
believe
2.4.3 is correct although it may be incorrect.).
Open Office replaced Star Office
and
a hatchet job was done to KDE and KDE programs. There is no more KDE.
Considering if you had an official copy of RH7.3 installed you could
then
automaticall update most programs then the only advantage RH 8.0 would
bring
to your system would be the updated kernel and the new configuration
program.
As for as the programs which you can not automatically update an
inspection
shows most of the GUI programs appear to be KDE the very programs RH
left out
of RH 8.0.
Bottom line RH 8.0 Personal is not half as good as RH 7.3 Personal.
I have no idea the status of the profession edition is because it cost
$150
versus $40 for the personal. Note RH 8.0 Personal is cheaper than RH 7.3
Personal which was $55.
I would recommend switching to Suse which is in some ways a more
advanced
distribution than RH except for Yast2. If you want to do a standard
configuration with Suse but if you have a oddball or personalized
configuration well you may experience certain difficulties.
As far as RH new GUI it appears to be nothing more than a screwed up
version
of Gnome.
Fortunally I have 2 HDs for this computer a test HD and the normal
operating
HD. I say fortunately because I installed RH 8.0 on the test HD for
verification of installation before updating the normal system. The
above
comments come from that test.
There is only one other comment on this pitiful trash distribution - RH
8.0 I
wish to make. At our next Linux meeting I will give away the RH 8.0
complete
box as a boobie prize.
Thanks
Frank
On Wednesday 23 October 2002 08:33, Paul Kraus wrote:
> What does everyone think of RedHat 8.
>
> Paul Kraus
> Network Administrator
> PEL Supply Company
> 216.267.5775 Voice
> 216-267-6176 Fax
> www.pelsupply.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-newbie" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-23 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-23 12:33 RedHat 8 Paul Kraus
2002-10-23 12:49 ` Ken Boyer
2002-10-23 12:56 ` Paul Kraus
2002-10-24 0:53 ` Jude DaShiell
2002-10-23 13:32 ` Don Petrowski
2002-10-23 12:56 ` Paul Furness
2002-10-23 13:03 ` Paul Kraus
2002-10-23 13:44 ` Paul Furness
2002-10-23 13:33 ` Haines Brown
2002-10-23 20:30 ` Frank Roberts - SOTL
2002-10-23 20:57 ` Haines Brown
2002-10-24 11:39 ` Frank Roberts - SOTL
2002-10-24 13:25 ` Bryan Simmons
2002-10-24 13:58 ` Paul Furness
2002-10-24 18:01 ` Frank Roberts - SOTL
2002-10-24 16:36 ` Paulo Jorge
2002-10-23 13:48 ` Don Petrowski
2002-10-23 15:39 ` Carl
2002-10-23 20:24 ` Frank Roberts - SOTL
2002-10-23 20:31 ` Paul Kraus [this message]
2002-10-24 11:33 ` Frank Roberts - SOTL
2002-10-24 13:13 ` Paul Furness
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='007001c27ad3$398c0140$64fea8c0@pkrausxp' \
--to=pkraus@pelsupply.com \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sotl155360@earthlink.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox